 |
|
Spod
|
|
The Kenny Everett Video Cassette
Nov 1999 time: 05:12
|
|
Spod here.
What are the major differences in tactics between single player and multiplayer? For example, when I play alone, my cities are relatively lightly defended, usually two defensive units fortified plus one offensive unit on sentry. I imagine this would be suicidal in multiplayer.
Also I imagine the diplomacy is a lot different. Are humans any more trustworthy than the computer?
------------------
SpoD ThE FlOAtiNG HeAd
|
|
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:12
|
|
Bloody good questions! Been a while since they were addressed in a single topic.
IMHO, the major difference between SP and MP, given a reasonable standard of human play, is that your oppo is about 130 times (minimum) more difficult. Humans won't, for example, continue to hurl under-strength units at your city's defenders on mindless suicide missions.
For many, many other reasons (a lot of which will no doubt appear in this topic), but mainly connected to the stupidity of the AI, I reckon SP and MP are totally different games. In fact, IMHO, MP is where this game really takes off into the realms (I hope) its creator envisaged.
As for trustworthiness, it depends with whom you play. I suspect, on balance, human trustworthiness outstrips the AI's. I'd like to think so anyway.
The only way to find out is to play! 
------------------
finbar
Mono Rules!
#33984591
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eddy
|
|
The AI is predictable, you know when they'll attack, how they'll attack, and everything... MP... you never know!
Being an ally actually means something! paying a civ to attack someone actually means something!
...and a whole load more!
Eddy
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spod
|
|
The Kenny Everett Video Cassette
Nov 1999 time: 05:12
|
|
Hey thanks guys. Anyone ever actually finished an MP game?
------------------
SpoD ThE FlOAtiNG HeAd
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Matthew
|
|
Manhattan, Kansas . USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:12
|
|
AI's don't build cities on hills, mountains, and the like, and then fill the city with vet pikemen. Nor do they terraform terrain under a city for better defence.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
I think MP games are easier because you can form a lasting Alliance (for the right combo of people) unlike an AI that will turn on you eventually. The AI plays to gang up on you because it knows you are the only oponent in the end. In MP there are many combinations that make it interesting, but also easier. As an average or worse player myself, I last longer in a MP than a SP....
Important in a MP game is a GOOD alliance, not always best to ally with first person as you may not be able to trust them long term.
As I always play Raging hordes, defenders is always first priority , but then expansion rapidly is target....
------------------
Rasputin The Mad Monk, Lover of the Russian Queen
|
|
|  |
 |
|
C Chulainn
|
|
Leeds,WestYorks,UK
Jan 1970 time: 05:12
|
|
The AI may not stack to avoid bribery but it will stack spies or diplos to avoid them being expelled... I've never played MP but it would be a relief to see something different - every game I play ends up with me having a tech lead against a vast global alliance of fundamentalists whose only object is to steal Space Flight.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spod
|
|
The Kenny Everett Video Cassette
Nov 1999 time: 05:12
|
|
Spod here.
Is pillaging a good tactic in multiplayer?
------------------
SpoD ThE FlOAtiNG HeAd
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|