 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
David Murray
|
|
quote:

Nope, I voted for Bush becuase of Gore's postitions on gun control and other issues. While I don't agree with any of Bush's positions I find his positions much less horrible then Gore's openly socialist ones. While I would like to vote libertarian I need to yeild to practical concerns, and another 8 years under the democrats would not be acceptable to me.
 |
So tell me, you find it preferable having the right to carry as much guns as you want? You don't favor any gun control, despite all the high school massacres? Okay, that's a whole other issue. But I find it surprising you value the rights of the market, the pro-gun lobby, etc, over the rights of women, who Bush is determined to quash, and the rights of those who favor increased tolerance of gays, more respect for the environment, etc. You may be a free market libertarian, but you certainly don't sound like a social one. As such, I doubt you're so much libertarian as an extreme anti-government conservative. A lot of people who call themselves "libertarian" are really extreme conservatives. 
quote:

Up until this year most people didn't even know about the electoral college so I don't think that is a good explanation for the low turnout. I think that a better explanation would be that many find it distasteful to have to choose between a candidiate who you disagree with on every issue and a candidate who you "only" disagree with on most issues.
 |
Believe you me, most people I speak to say that there's no difference between the candidates. Both Dems and Reps are sleazy to the public's eye. However, Bush won't reform any part of the electoral process. We need to exterminate the sleaze, the antiquated electoral college, the corporate influence in the media and in politics, and enthuse the public with new and innovative policies. Arguing over tax cuts may get some people going; but it does nothing for the millions out there homeless and living in poverty. Arguing over how to be tougher on drugs impresses reactionaries, the right and other old stalwarts, but for social libertarians and a growing number of people the war on drugs is looking increasingly inept.
We need a new lease of life in politics--welcome, Mr Nader. 
[This message has been edited by David Murray (edited January 31, 2001).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
skorpion59
|
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
May 1999 time: 23:14
|
|
I have to agree with Chris.....
if you want to continue the political discussion, take it to the OT forum. This is a CtP2 forum.
EDIT: Markos, any possibility you could close or move this thread. This is starting to get out of hand.
[This message has been edited by skorpion59 (edited January 31, 2001).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
OmniGod
|
 |
Philadelphia, PA, USA --> Really Canadian
Dec 1999 time: 00:14
|
|
Alright time to weigh in... I am one for the greatest political freedom of a few, the enhancement of knowledge that I believe is true, the openning of churches to all that proclaim me King (would have choose God but thought I'd be a reservist), the freedom to procreate the population through my loins... that about sums up my great government and I was stunned when it worked so well in CTP2. Have you guessed my gov't... of course it's theocracy with the every few years of anarchy to control my subjects. Hey what can I say, I'm a evil dictator... like I've said before, if my cities don't produce well, what do I do... I sell them to another civ and then bombard the city... long live freedom in Omni's World 
Yeah maybe it's true, maybe it's not... if it's not then I'll choose the Canadian Republic Dominion. Little "free" healthcare, no military, and lots of beer and hockey.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Murray
|
|
quote:

Originally posted by OmniGod on 02-02-2001 01:20 AM
Alright time to weigh in... I am one for the greatest political freedom of a few, the enhancement of knowledge that I believe is true, the openning of churches to all that proclaim me King (would have choose God but thought I'd be a reservist), the freedom to procreate the population through my loins... that about sums up my great government and I was stunned when it worked so well in CTP2. Have you guessed my gov't... of course it's theocracy with the every few years of anarchy to control my subjects. Hey what can I say, I'm a evil dictator... like I've said before, if my cities don't produce well, what do I do... I sell them to another civ and then bombard the city... long live freedom in Omni's World 
Yeah maybe it's true, maybe it's not... if it's not then I'll choose the Canadian Republic Dominion. Little "free" healthcare, no military, and lots of beer and hockey.
 |
just be thankful you don't have the death penalty and you have a national healthcare system. Believe me. You'd miss it if were to go.
[This message has been edited by David Murray (edited February 02, 2001).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Alpha Wolf
|
|
Prince of the Barbarians
Feb 2001 time: 05:14
|
|
I propose the true form of government is the press. After all they were telling us who won long before most polling places even opened. here in Illinois we were told for weeks that Bush didnt have a chance in Illinois. i know many people who didnt take the time to vote (a lame excuse in my opinion) because either they were gore supporters and he was easily going to win Illinois, and bush supporters who didnt vote because it was a wasted vote. Then the news is announcing then retracking, then reannouncing a winner sometimes before people on the west coast have voted. Why go vote if the election has already been decided? i've always hated the electoral college until now. i just think it needs to be tweaked that instead of all or nothing, you get electoral votes for the number of representative districts you win and who ever wins the overall state popular vote gets the 2 votes that represent the senators.
I'm not exactly sure which game government this would fit under or if it even qualifies as either a republic or democracy. So i might add 2 new governments; pressacracy and something to represent my ideal electoral system.
I would find it interesting for some real life thoughts on government types. For instance, is communism itself bad, or just how its been implemented.
It seems to me that there are really only 2 types of governments: one the people get to freely elected, and one that is forced upon them. Everything else just seems like policy making to me. For instances, was Rome a republic(senate), a tyranny(military installed emperor), or a monarachy(emperor by birth right)? Were medieval european governments monarchies or theocracies?
------------------
History is written by the victor.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
TacticalGrace
|
 |
Invisible, Silent, Deadly.
Jan 2001 time: 05:14
|
|
quote:

Originally posted by Alpha Wolf on 02-02-2001 02:10 AM
I would find it interesting for some real life thoughts on government types. For instance, is communism itself bad, or just how its been implemented.
...
For instances, was Rome a republic(senate), a tyranny(military installed emperor), or a monarachy(emperor by birth right)? Were medieval european governments monarchies or theocracies?
 |
Communism was demonised by the US during the cold war. most people now don't understand what it is.
Note that Hitler's greatest enemies were communists both within and without.
Rome was a republic originally but this didn't last very long before someone worked out how much more fun a tyranny/despotism would be. This developed eventually vaguely into a Monarchy with a line of succession although often it wasn't the emperors actual blood line that was continued but an adopted son.
The English Monarchy was certainly not a Theocracy, at least not until Henry VIII. There were many disputes between the King and the Church - the Church had many powers independant of the King.
quote:

I think it's really funny how RepubliKKKans completely disregard the rights of black people, Jews, liberals, etc, yet are fanatically pro-armed forces. It's rather scary, to be honest.
 |
funny how if you replace the word "Republican" with "Nazi" you often get a meaningful statement.
The original conception of the US by it's founding fathers was a state without taxes and hence without a permanent military. As a consequence we have the "right to bear arms" to allow for "a well formed militia" in place of a military.
------------------
Do not be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Steve5304
|
|
Racine ,WI USA
Jan 2001 time: 05:14
|
|
Mr fun you truly are an idiot.......arent you?
the south merely wanted to be left alone.They didnt want northeners telling them what they could and couldnt do. Southerners are different people from northeners. Understand? Southerners are Mainly French , Dutch, Native , and Welsh decent.North is English,German, and italian. Huge differences between the 2 existed.Southerners were Hunters , Farmers , Miners , Fur traders and would prefer to live without neighbors. Northeners were Factoryhands,Political activists,Scientists, Railroad workers , and would prefer to live near a grocery store.The differences are still obvoius today. Most southerners would rather Smoke a Hog and roll some green up.While the Federal Government in the north still thinks weed is bad and Hunting is evil.
The north was incapable of evening defeating the Rag and tag Army of Northern Virginia. Lee took this army and for 3 years chased the Yanks around at the battles of Mannasses , Bull Run, Antietnam , and Bull run 2.Only At gettysburg did the yankees finally learn that the Rebels were a superior fighting orce. You know when a Reb army of 80,000 Pushes a Yankee force of 290,000 all the way from Richmond to Pennsylvania is a much superior army.
The south never used Nazi Tactics you idiot. The Democratic party in control then (yes DEMOCRATIC , The political Grandfather of Clinton , Gore , Etc.) Allowed more freedom then the Republican North.Example- Service wasnt mandatory , Martial law wasnt imposed , and Southerners were free to do what they wanted.
These days the South Now not only has more people......it is more economically Powerful than the north. (florida and texas make up 17% of us economy alone)
------------------
P.S. 'The south will rise again'
we are different people
[This message has been edited by Steve5304 (edited February 02, 2001).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Murray
|
|
MrFun is totally right in his summarization of the Southern states at that time...they were characterized by terror, burnings and lynchings by white-hooded kooks and police, official apartheid and racial tyranny...anyone who denies that fact is an ignorant revisionist who smears the memory of all those decent, honest black people who were brutally murdered at the time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Steve5304
|
|
Racine ,WI USA
Jan 2001 time: 05:14
|
|
Yea but spreading such rumours about my Brave Sourthern Relatives Angers me. One marched and survived Picketts Charge.And another died at the Battle of Shiloh. I am proud of my Heritage and im proud of them !
---------------
'the south will rise again'
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sean
|
|
Auckland, New Zealand.
Jan 2001 time: 05:14
|
|
You would do well to remember that not all of us in this forum are Americans. As such, the constent bleating about the repubicrats and the North vs South, has fast become tedious. Either talk about civ governments or shut up.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Murray
|
|
Okay, let's end it.
Although I know this is the wrong place and everything, I still get my back up from people telling me to shut up when they are not forced to read this topic.
But I agree. If any of you want to debate politics, I recommend www.turnleft.com/interactive.html
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Alpha Wolf
|
|
Prince of the Barbarians
Feb 2001 time: 05:14
|
|
cant we all just git along?????
------------------
History is written by the victor.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Steve5304
|
|
Racine ,WI USA
Jan 2001 time: 05:14
|
|
Hey Murray............**** YOU
i see no more use for this thread now that its been taken over bye Slack-Jawed Gawkers who stop at nothing to put down other peoples Upbringing.......Even sending them Threatining EMAIL.
do it again and I will ~!?%@ nuke you murray........no kiddin
-------------------
'the south will rise again'
[This message has been edited by Steve5304 (edited February 04, 2001).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14. Apolyton Time is 00:14. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|