 |
|
Aurelius
|
|
San Francisco
Dec 1999 time: 05:12
|
|
Hey Smash,
Don't use them much either. But they are the only air units that can occupy a town after destroying all the city defensive units. So if you like battleships...you might want to move a helicopter along the same sea squares. They have good reconnaisance (spot subs) and comparable movement. So Battleships and helicopters are a powerful duo.
Aurelius.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Genghis Al
|
|
of the Russian horde
Dec 1999 time: 05:12
|
|
I build a helocoptor, once...
I don't think they are so great. they don't do to much and they cost alot.
------------------
Ah man! Ghandi! New game.
-Genghis Al
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Aurelius
|
|
San Francisco
Dec 1999 time: 05:12
|
|
I like Paratroopers. Is it my imagination that they win alot? I use vet troops only in late year. I actually have wondered if they have some surprise built into their attack...maybe it is just the 6! I like paratroopers as they help assalt remote cities of a dying AI....Don't like all the partisans pillaging.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
I do use Explorers: they're great scouts, and good for guiding stacks around the ZOCs to get to a target. After escort send them into a city radius of an obliging neighbor, who kindly returns them to the nearest city for the next stack (instead of the capital, which may be on a different continent).
I built a helo once. I built subs in one game. Actually, I can't remember ever building a carrier! It's easier to capture an enemy airbase or small city with paras, since they have a range of 10 which usually reaches across the seas on civ maps.
I never/rarely build: - Horsemen (usually have a few from huts)
- Elephants (not agressive that early)
- Catapults (same reason)
- Caravels (wait for frigates)
- Cannon (prefer Dragoons)
- Arty (prefer Cavalry)
- Fanatics (Fundy vs AI too easy)
- Marines (prefer paras for beachhead & assault from land)
- Subs (slow; don't fit my naval strategy)
- Helos
- Carriers
- Nukes
I really hate it when the end game devolves into nuclear exchanges (with the AI getting unlimited range, >:P grr) so I often disable nukes in rules.txt.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
KenThur
|
|
North San Francisco Bay, California Republic
May 1999 time: 05:12
|
|
God I LOVE this game!! There are as many approaches to it as there are players. 
What many of U seem to NOT build... guess what? That's exactly what i do build!?
Let me preface by saying: i'v graduated to strictly playing with other humans. Tho i do occasionally play with myself (if no one is watching). 
So what follows is based on MP, deity level, usually 1x, restless or raging, random of preferably med or large(i love to explore new worlds). 
ARCHERS: 2nd unit i want... after horses. They defend as well as anything up muskets. Have enuf counterattack, especially if vets(which is what i build), to kill anything up to muskets. Almost as important; they are the only military unit that takes 30 to build so it's quite easy bang them out or rush build them at the sign of barbs or other aggressors (they make easy "change", so-to-speak). 
Plus, combined with a couple of horses, make a great barb-leader-killing team (& in deity=150 gold, i LOVE that!). 
EXPLORERS: as don Don says... they make GREAT scouts! Ignore ZOC's & U can approach suspected enemy positions from ANY direction. Move 2 & back off 1, move 2 backoff 1 = in anything but all clear terrain; there's not a unit that can touch'm.
AND even tho they can ignore others' ZOC's... others can't ignore theirs = great for freezing that elephant/dragoon/cav unit so it can't wipe out your main attacker force! He-he. 
AND THEN of course, there's always their favorite pastime... hut-hunting in every last unexplored region; like the polar caps(they can even run from hut-hordes if U do the approach rite). 
CARVELS: often, but not always. Like'm because they carry 3 vs frigate's 2.
PLUS i just LOVE blowing away those pesky little triemes that bug U sometimes & even an occasional horse or settler on the shore if carvel is a vet. 
Actually, i LOVE frigates, but at that stage of the game other tech's usually take priority... unless i'm an island nation. Then it's navy all the way & Megellan's=cruical. Then your little carvels speed along their little shuttle routes for the rest of the game. 
FANATICS: NEVER used to build pre-MP, because playing solo, NEVER went into Fundy govt. Believe me, if U havn't played into the modern era against some good, SMART, UNPREDICTABLE human leaders... then U have a lesson to learn about the value of Fundy & those dirt-cheap, 4-defense/2 hit-point, get-in-the-way, blitzkrieg-slowing, little fanatics.
You havn't experienced the FULL range of this fantasticaly diverse game until your democracy takes on a Fundy that knows what he's doing!!
For the cost of 1 helio or armor, U can build 5 of these little rascals. Put them in fortresses & slow down anything short of a nuke attack!!
U hate'm or ya lov'm... depending on which side of the war your on.
HELIO's: what Smash asked about before all this started. True very expensive(don't U wish they could carry troops@that price?!); really too bad they are so costly. But...
If you can afford to produce a few of them (& don't bother building as vet's); they make excellent sea patrols (just like real life).
Few things can kill them at sea, they can stay "on station" for many turns, they spot 2 squares, & they can sink little piss-ant naval units like subs, transports, & destroyers when they try to sneak into your space!
ALSO, as mentioned above, they make a good combined arms attack by stopping partisan formation & occupying an emptied city(whereupon they become instantly refreshed). 
Whew! Sorry, must be the caffine in my fingers. Other than that... have a good day!
PS: Sten S/S'Fart/others that play their way... we GOTTA play. Our styles are so diff, it would be most interesting.
So ICQ me some time, big boy. 
------------------
"Hm-m-m, doubt me you will?"
[This message has been edited by KenThur (edited January 09, 2000).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
My Wife Hates CIV
|
|
Michigan
Jan 1970 time: 05:12
|
|
I agree with everthing KenThur said above. I also like helicopters. Four or five together can deliver a lot of fire power.
Explorers are must have units. Just to explore the land before attack.
Now, deity level... this option makes the game too easy. Some of you live off this barb king bonus. Whoever gets lucky with 4 or 5 kings can run away with the game, instead of taxes everything the cities generate can go into science. It also slows a already slow game even more because instead of having workers in the fields bustin butt you have to have them in the city for happy problems. There's nothing baby about playing at a lower level. It's still humans on the other end.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
wonderdog4
|
|
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Jun 1999 time: 05:12
|
|
I use helicopters to accomplish the following tactical goals.
1. Find and destroy subs and transports.
2. Find and kill settlers, engineers, caravans, freight, diplomats and spies -- especially in remote areas.
3. Exterminate unwalled cities (always attack from over land squares to do this) which could later be used as airbases or ports.
4. Prevent establishment of new cities.
5. Eliminate huts I have no hope of getting to.
6. Harass distant, isolated cities in order to divert resources away from the area I really intend to attack.
7. Find and destoy explorers and scouts.
Helicopters are very useful in games in which opposition cities are not yet walled --which frequently happens in those games where the opposing civs develop late. But they are certainly not useful in all games.
Once a helicopter leaves a city, I never expect it to return. I think of them more as missles, than as regular units.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sieve Too
|
|
New Hampshire, USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:12
|
|
I'm no big fan of Helicopters. They're expensive, slow, have a lousy defense, lose hit points just by sitting around, always cause unhappiness in Democracy, can only attack once per turn, can be attacked by any unit, and you have to research a dead-end advance to get them. That's a big list of negatives.
In general, Stealth Fighters, Bombers or AEGIS can do the same things as Helicopters, but better. Stealth Fighters don't cause unhappiness in Dem and can attack multiple times. Bombers can only be attacked by fighters and have more punch than Helicopters. AEGIS can patrol the seas indefinitely without losing hps and are mostly immune to air attacks.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
wonderdog4
|
|
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Jun 1999 time: 05:12
|
|
Everything you say is true, but the question, I believe, was about how to use helicopters "smartly".
Frankly, I get sick of stealth. It's too easy. Helicopters are a fun diversion -- a way to vary your forces and break the monotony of stealth, steath, stealth, howizter, howizter, howitzer, boom, boom, boom, die, die, die. And they sound cool to boot.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
Regarding the question of transporting groud units on Helos:
First, you get Helos with CA, so think of them as combined gunships and troop transports. That's why Helos can occupy a city. There wouldn't be enough troops to constitute a whole Rifles unit, and they're only effective when used with air cavalry tactics.
Secondly it's a matter of sheer capacity. For airlift you can pack hundreds of soldiers into an airplane that is making many trips between cities with large airports. The really big helicopter transports like the Chinook might carry 30 men (about half a platoon); the UH1G carries 6-8 (about half a squad).
[This message has been edited by don Don (edited January 13, 2000).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
wonderdog4
|
|
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Jun 1999 time: 05:12
|
|
Now that's what I call smart.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|