 |
|  |
 |
|
VivalaCTP2
|
|
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Sep 2000 time: 05:14
|
|
I reckon a succession game with say 50 people would be awesome, also we should try smaller games like, with say about 4 or 5 people who can discuss between themselves what sort of strategy to adopt. With the big game it would just be a chaotic free for all with everyone using a different technique, intersting .....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VivalaCTP2
|
|
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Sep 2000 time: 05:14
|
|
BTW, off the topic, how many posts do you need to get off this humiliating settler status?
[This message has been edited by VivalaCTP2 (edited May 02, 2001).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
well, this forum can take more traffic, no?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VivalaCTP2
|
|
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Sep 2000 time: 05:14
|
|
Token post for status elevation ....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VivalaCTP2
|
|
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Sep 2000 time: 05:14
|
|
Hmmmm, maybe one more ...
Wohoooo ....
[This message has been edited by VivalaCTP2 (edited May 03, 2001).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Skeeve
|
 |
Washington Township, NJ USA
Mar 2001 time: 00:14
|
|
quote:

Originally posted by Immortal Wombat on 05-04-2001 12:59 PM
Isn't that spamming, and worthy of a 30% post count reduction ? 
Oh, and +1 for me 
 |
Yeah, technically we're not supposed to post messages for the sole purpose of elevating our status... but hey, it's nice to see someone get excited about it for a change. As long as he doesn't post another 100 messages like that to go up to Warlord, I guess it's okay to let him slide. Then again, it's not up to us is it?
By the way, Vivala, if you want to elevate your post count quickly, go to the Off-Topic forum. It's practically real time, and you can bang out a dozen messages in less than a half hour sometimes. Not that I've done that.... 
- Skeeve
------------------
My reach exceeds my grasp!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Immortal Wombat
|
 |
in perpetuity
Dec 2000 time: 05:14
|
|
quote:

By the way, Vivala, if you want to elevate your post count quickly, go to the Off-Topic forum. It's practically real time, and you can bang out a dozen messages in less than a half hour sometimes. Not that I've done that.... 
 |
quote:

As long as he doesn't post another 100 messages like that to go up to Warlord,
 |
That is all the OT is for anyway 
I had some thoughts in my 3 day break from Apolyton.
1) There should be a way of competing in CTP2 multiplayer, rather than just succession games.
2) The CTP PBEM chart, you have to submit your highest score to get "registered".
3) No point of that in CTP2 cos everyone wins flat out on Deity (or so I've heard, I don't even play...) 
4) How fast can you win CTP2. There are Civ2 junkies who win the space race with one city, or by conquest on gigantic map before 1AD...
5) How fast can you win a succession game? Faster cos everyone is using different strategies, or slower cos everyone is using different strategies?
6) Why not find out?
So... my suggestion is "CTP2 Doubles" we play succession, with the sole aim to win as fast as possible. No writing out detailed tails of infantry exercises, just win the game. Then we can have a league, like CTP, but in pairs. Highest score league, fastest conquest league, fastest science victory league.
How does that sound? Any other ideas? I wanna reopen the multiplaying forum. 
Ben
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
I think a one-city challenge or 'same game' challenge would be the easiest to go with for the time being....
We'd just need someone to provide the first save-game file, and then everyone can download it and play the game to see how high they can score or how early they can end the game (depending on what the challenge is).
We could do that for scenarios too...
------------------
phoenixcager of the Civgaming Network.
Visit the CGN forums.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14. Apolyton Time is 00:14. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|