 |
|
|
MasterBob, you must be the no-trading idiot Sgt Sheets beat up in MP. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sergeant Sheets
|
|
of every inner Fantasy you have.
Jan 1970 time: 05:12
|
|
Battleships are good for two things: High seas terrorism (with missiles this task is done for) and harbor defence. The enemy has to exhaust five to ten missles to get a battleship, if property fortified.
[This message has been edited by Sergeant Sheets (edited February 18, 2000).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sergeant Sheets
|
|
of every inner Fantasy you have.
Jan 1970 time: 05:12
|
|
Yeah, mommie put me to bed too early.
Just that I have had some bad experience with battleships.
Still, I think that battleships are less effective than a good AEGIS and a couple subs filled with missiles. In MP that is a good deturant; in SP it don't do squat.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Aurelius
|
|
San Francisco
Dec 1999 time: 05:12
|
|
Hi Cato,
It's valid! I think I've displayed it in public before without too much trouble. Let me know your list! I'm sorry that you don't have airplanes in Liverpool, but at least you have a slow boat in SF to dispatch the goodies--AU
By the way, going back to the thread, I like rifleman! I'm never sorry about having to develop the conscription advance.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|