17-04-2001 14:10									#1
	Remember The Maine Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

On February 15, 1898, a mysterious explosion destroyed the American battleship Maine in Havana Harbor forcing the United States into a war with Spain.

In 1976, H.Rickover found out the ship's demise was self-inflicted.

What do you know/think?

	17-04-2001 16:13									#3
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

Casualties on USS Maine:
Officers: 2
Sailors: 230
Marines: 28
Total: 260

Survivors of USS Maine:
Officers: 24
Sailors: 60
Marines: 11
Total: 95

http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq71-1.htm

Why was History so lenient to the officers?
Why none of the 24 officers knew the causes of the disaster?

Edit: I wrote 17 officers survived but checking out again the statistics I found I was wrong: 24 officers survived:
[This message has been edited by Waku (edited April 17, 2001).]

	17-04-2001 19:20									#4
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

I didn't look at the links, guys, because I know what caused the explosion. A spark in coal bunker set off the Maine's coal, blowing a whole through the hull. USN investigators confirmed this after the Spanish-American war. Certain US newspapers (Hearst's Journel for one), very much wanted war with Spain, because they felt that Cuba was part of the United States' 'Manifest Destiny', and should be annexed. The US congress thought differently after the war, and Cuba was not annexed.

------------------
All knowledge begins with the phrase: I don't know.

	17-04-2001 23:40									#5
	Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

I agree with Chris, the true reason of the explosion was a internal explode provoked by the coal.
It was only a easy reason to declare the war to Spain and conquer Cuba, Puerto Rico and Philipines...and the Pacifican Possesions. Which were important bases for the control of Caribean sea and Pacific, the natural ways to expand for USA.

	17-04-2001 23:55									#6
	Inflate your Upload Space

even a US history book that I read says that the Spaniards didn´t sink the maine, if a us book history says so....

	18-04-2001 00:30									#7
	Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

It seems proved the causes were internal (we can discard the theories envolving spanish or cuban agents).

But... is there any good reason to have only 2 casualties among the officers and 258 among the rest of the crew?

(Percentually 8% officers died, 80% crew died)

Where were the officers? were they in the city?

	18-04-2001 00:44									#8
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Well, of course, I believe all of you; it just is a bit weird: An American ship exploding in a hostile harbor?
I'm not attempting to start a political discussion here, but we just had this in the Chinese sea...

	21-04-2001 17:05									#11
	Put an end to popups!

Someone here read Leguineche's book on the War of Cuba & Mr Hearst? Very entertaining. I agree that the maine thing wasn't but a cheap excuse to expel Spain from the Western hemisphere.

I never quite understood though the REAL reasons why PR was annexed but Cuba was not. cpoulos could you fill us in?

	21-04-2001 18:22									#12
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

JayBee, there is at least a chapter in Richard Hofstadter's Social Darwinism in American Thought, (1959), that details some of the reasons for the US failure to annex Cuba after the war. I have a copy around here somewhere, if you're really interested, but any university library should have a copy of this book.

Salutations,
Exile

	21-04-2001 18:58									#13
	Got spare money?

Oh, well, a short summary in here would suffice I guess Can you give me the bibliograhical info for that book?

	21-04-2001 20:09									#14
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

Well, Richard Hofstadter is one of the premier Americanists of the postwar period, though nowadays his books are considered more as a starting point for research than the definitive work in the field. Social Darwinism was one of his earlier ones and IIRC, his research revealed a strong strain of late 19th century "Anglo-Saxonism" in 1890s American politics which strongly frowned on the idea of incorporating a new state into the Union that was primarily hispanic in ethnicity. The question, at the time, wasn't "Should America annex Cuba?" but rather, "Does America really want to allow these 'equatorial'people, and the financial and social burdens we believe they would invariably subsequently become, into the United States?" Typical 19th century-style racism. I believe that this is an oversimplification of his argument, but hopefully, you get the idea.

Salutations,
Exile

	21-04-2001 20:18									#15
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Yes, I have heard something about that. The concept of 'Aztlan' (Chicano) probably originated as a Latino response to that "Anglosaxonism". Both of these concepts are quite abandoned nowadays, which is great.

But while this might explain why Cuba was not annexed, it surely does not explain why Puerto Rico was.

	22-04-2001 09:42									#16
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

Well, Exile beat me to the punch. Racism was indeed behind the reason the Congress refused to annex Cuba. Racism was quite strong in America at this time (Well Duh, when isn't it? ), but not just towards Hispanics, but also towards the Irish, the Chinese, and several other groups. The United States had several opprotunities to annex various South American Republics, under dubious circumstances, but that's another story. Hawaii was almost abandoned because it was filled with little forigners, not suitable to white society, but strategic considerations won out in it's case. Many people really wanted, and fully expected Cuba to be annexed, so the final disposition was not a popular one. Teddy Roosevelt was bitterly disapointed that it was not made a state, for example.

------------------
All knowledge begins with the phrase: I don't know.