 |
|
Mao
|
|
Apolyton
Jun 1999
time: 00:12
|
|
Yeah, c'mon Chairman, why not? Besides, they'll all think you're a DL anyway. Just have a bit of fun, and then you can leave.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Mao
|
|
Apolyton
Jun 1999
time: 00:12
|
|
NOOOOOOOOOOO C'mon! Let's have some fun! Please?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Mao
|
|
Apolyton
Jun 1999
time: 00:12
|
|
Uhhh...CtG, you realize that you complaining about other people's spam actually makes more spam than the original spammers. That's like someone in the movies screaming out "SHUT UP!" to everyone else. They make more noise. And I've been here longer than you anyway, nothing new.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Mao
|
|
Apolyton
Jun 1999
time: 00:12
|
|
Geez Adam, you sound like an old hag. Just let people have some fun, live and let live geez. You know what, you probably don't know the first thing about Chairman Mao anyway. All you know is what the western media teaches you, like the Cultural Revolution. But what you don't know is how he actually improved the lives of peasants greatly, but no, you don't care about that do you? As long it's good for America, you don't give a damn about how much Mao helped the Chinese people, you only care whether or not he's an enemy of the US. And who else do you want to lead China? Chiang Kai-Shek? Yeah, OK, maybe you should read up a bit on his government. Corruption as far as the eye can see. It's not a coincidence Mao had the support of majority in taking power and Chiang was hated by the commoners for making an elite upper class.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
adaMada
|
 |
"The Iron" Stadium, Ubergorsk, Apolytonia (C3DG)
Mar 2000
time: 00:12
|
|
Mao:
I think you took what I said wrong. I didn't meen to be hostile. I broke down what I said below, and put a little explanation.
quote:
Should I respond to this…
Let me think…
|
I was talking about the comments on the albert speer arguement made above.
quote:
All I can say is that I wish that the Albert Spear had gone so well . Actually, I didn't know that
Chairman Mao even existed before reading this forum. (sorry HAL)
|
I was kidding. I didn't meen to emply that I was planning to protest. I (persionally) am not offended by the title 'Mao' (or 'Chairman Mao'). Since both of you have said that your handle is totally civ based, I can't find any reason to complain. Even if you didn't, I wouldn't complain. If someone was truely offended, and they came up with a good enough reason, then I might take their side, but I don't care enough to start the battle on my own.
Pretty much, I don't mind your (mao's) handle, nor Chairman Mao's. I was just making a comment to indicate that I had read this thread. I didn't mean to say anything else.
While I'm here, I might as well say that I think that what HAL did was very apropriate. Not that I hold any bad fealings tward mao for not changing his handle, but that HAL deserves recognition for what he did.
Mao: If you are still offended, then tell me why, because I can't figure out what I did that is wrong.
------------------
adaMada
adamada@springmail.com
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12.
Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-05-2000 06:09
. Actually, I didn't know that Chairman Mao even existed before reading this forum. (sorry HAL) 
|