Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Civ2-Strategy-Archive > Strategic Bombing?
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread    < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Sortub is offline Sortub
Chieftain
Austin, TX
Apr 2000
time: 05:12
Post  Old Post 13-05-2000 09:36
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
Strategic Bombing? Full PM-box? Change here!

This is perhaps one of those areas where Civ II could always be a little more "realistic," but the history of the twentieth century is rife with instances of bombing "civilian" targets for "military" purposes. See Dresden, Baghdad, Belgrade for some examples.

Anyhow, it seems like, instead of getting that patronizing message admonishing you "only land units may occupy enemy cities," after military units are cleared out, bombers -- and cruise missles, for that matter -- should have the option of selecting a target to bomb for one, as spies and diplomats have for sabotage. There could be a fairly high chance of destroying the enemy installation at the cost of one movement point. Just speculating here, but perhaps an SAM system could forestall such attacks.

Whether wonders could be destroyed in such a fashion is another matter; perhaps the chance could be lesser of destroying their functionality in such an attack.

And while I'm on the subject, do the "Stealth" bombers and fighters in the original version seem to have little advantage over the regular fighter and bomber units? The latest HiRes modpack addresses this issue. If they don't already, perhaps the Stealh units could have "submarine" cloaking procedures.

Any thoughts?

Case is offline Case

King
The backlash starts here
Feb 2000
time: 15:12
Post  Old Post 13-05-2000 09:48 Visit Case<br><a href=/members><img src=/forums/images/supporter-icon.gif border=0></a><BR>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

Assigning the submarine flag to units makes them hard to spot, but they can only attack naval units at sea. Anyway, the purpose of stealth is to make it easier for aircraft to enter hostile air space. In a turn based game this obviously isn't an issue as the AI can't do much to block your movements. To simulate stealth aircraft push up the attack and defence values of aircraft units, and maybe give the the 2x defences vs air advantage.

Venger is offline Venger
King
Keeper of the Can-O'Whoopass
Jan 1970
time: 23:12
Thumbs up  Old Post 13-05-2000 10:07
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:

Originally posted by Sortub on 05-13-2000 12:36 AM
This is perhaps one of those areas where Civ II could always be a little more "realistic," but the history of the twentieth century is rife with instances of bombing "civilian" targets for "military" purposes. See Dresden, Baghdad, Belgrade for some examples.

Anyhow, it seems like, instead of getting that patronizing message admonishing you "only land units may occupy enemy cities," after military units are cleared out, bombers -- and cruise missles, for that matter -- should have the option of selecting a target to bomb for one, as spies and diplomats have for sabotage. There could be a fairly high chance of destroying the enemy installation at the cost of one movement point. Just speculating here, but perhaps an SAM system could forestall such attacks.


I somewhat like the concept, the SAM rather than forestall should reduce the likelihood of an attack. More realistic, though, is the possible destruction of a cities improvements (palace and wonders excluded) with every successful enemy attack, i.e. 15%. This was the case I believe in Civ1, but I am unsure it works in Civ2. Taking a city does lose half of it's improvements, but that seems a half-assed way to do it - the destruction of the 12 defending units didn't destroy anything, but the riflemen occupying the city destroys half...

quote:

Whether wonders could be destroyed in such a fashion is another matter; perhaps the chance could be lesser of destroying their functionality in such an attack.


See above. I'd prefer destruction to be a possible result rather than chosen act.

quote:

And while I'm on the subject, do the "Stealth" bombers and fighters in the original version seem to have little advantage over the regular fighter and bomber units? The latest HiRes modpack addresses this issue. If they don't already, perhaps the Stealh units could have "submarine" cloaking procedures.


I find the advantages huge. The Stealth fighter in fact is one of the most potent units in the game. The sub flag really screws up non sub units. Civ2 Test of Time includes an expanded rules list which includes a separate "Invisible until attack" flag, which promises to act more like a stealth. I am experimenting with that flag as we speak...

Venger

Sortub is offline Sortub
Chieftain
Austin, TX
Apr 2000
time: 05:12
Question  Old Post 13-05-2000 17:44
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

Venger-

I've been playing CivII since December, and pretty much have my hands full with it and the scenarios, modpacks, and "basic" game. I am wondering, however, if Test of Time is worth ordering. What do you think?

Cam is offline Cam
King
Australia
Jan 1970
time: 14:42
Arrow  Old Post 13-05-2000 19:24 Visit Cam's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

Sortub,

Not wishing to steal Venger's thunder or anything, but the "Should I buy Test of Time?" issue comes up somewhere on a pretty regular basis, such as... apolyton.net/forums/Forum4/HTML/000732.html

mindseye is offline mindseye
King
A Yankee living in Shanghai
Apr 1999
time: 13:12
Post  Old Post 15-05-2000 04:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

Hmmm, Sortub's notion of flagging an aircraft with the submarine attributes raises an interesting possibility: can you create an air unit with the sub flag? If so, could you use this to creat aircraft capable of attacking only sea units? This would be perfect for torpedo bombers, ASW helicopters and the like. Could this work?

- mindseye

Case is offline Case

King
The backlash starts here
Feb 2000
time: 15:12
Wink  Old Post 15-05-2000 11:00 Visit Case<br><a href=/members><img src=/forums/images/supporter-icon.gif border=0></a><BR>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

Giving aircraft the submarine flag works perfectly in creating anti-sub aircraft and torpedo bombers. Also, the submarine flag can be used to create land units (eg partisans) that can't attack land units, but are very hard to track down (and have a very nasy habit of appearing where you want them least if you use events to create them in senarios)

  < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12.
Apolyton Time is 00:12.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0407 seconds (89.57% PHP - 10.43% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net