 |
|
colossus
|
|
Hong Kong
Nov 1999 time: 05:14
|
|
In civ2, if you have many cities, you may come out to have 3 ashington, 4 Philadephia, 5 Boston or so. This is not a great problem, but often a nuisance. So I propose that there shall not be 2 cities of the same name at the same time. Just for convenience.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:14
|
|
Yeah, there should be much longer city name lists for each civilization... and I don't think we even need a 'leftover' list, what do you think?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Captain
|
 |
by Divine Right
May 2001 time: 00:14
|
|
Expanded city names shouldn't be hard to implement, so for those who actually go with the auto-naming function, I think it's a good idea.
Personally though, I never use that. I like to make up my own civ name (e.g. 1-the Valiant, 2-the Mariners, 3-the High Ones, etc.) and then I name each city along the theme of my civ (1-Valor, Honour, Glory, 2-Marinus, Oceanus, Hydros, 3-Citadel, Paradise, Bastion, Everclear, Light, Starseed, etc...) More fun, more personal, more connection to the game.
The other thing I usually do is name each city after location and nearby terrain (e.g. Silk Forests, Buffalo Plains, Buffalo Hills, Eastport, Northport, South Coast, Isthmus Jungle, Canal city, Iron Hills, Verdant, Hill Lake, etc...)
It helps me to keep track of things really easily. What also helps is that I rename cities when something happens (e.g. Bastion would be a key choke point, Intrepid would be a beachhead on another continent, Power City would be a manufacturing centre, Excelsior would be a sci city,and so on....)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14. Apolyton Time is 00:14. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|