 |
|
Ralf
|
 |
Sweden
Mar 2000 time: 06:14
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Alex 14
Here is some amazing information i found that proves civ 3 will be unique and much more exciting than any other call to power or civ game. |
Where did you found that piece of information? Please, always include a link to the source.
Last edited by Ralf on 17-06-2001 at 16:07
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ralf
|
 |
Sweden
Mar 2000 time: 06:14
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rasputin
what do you mean more than one improvement in city ??? isnt this the cae with civ 2 already... |
More then one library (or whatever) in one and the same city, i presume. IF its true, its probably dependent on city-size. So it aint meaningful to build 2 city-improvements of the same kind, in any old city. Compare with Civ-2 aqueducts and sewer-systems. They only become meaningful to build in order to go past a certain max city-size. However, as long as theres no link to the original source-material, we really cant evaluate this info much further.
Last edited by Ralf on 17-06-2001 at 15:51
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord_Davinator
|
|
Kathmandu
Nov 2000 time: 10:44
|
|
oae
whats the source?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Source, source, source, source!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Geoff the Medio
|
|
quote: I don't see how this is going to make the game so much better. It really might be a pain of having to build the same thing twice. |
If you could build multiple instances of happiness improvements, it would somewhat lessen the extreme importanace of happiness wonders.
Also, having never played a multiplayer civ2 game, I can't be sure, but I assume this would reduce the (assumed) extreme importance of certain wonders in MP games...
It'd also help prevent cities from running out of things to build
and it does make sense... why would a city of 100000 have only 1 temple?
and in situations where cultural wars are being waged alongside conventional ones... if a conquering race held a city long enough, then built a temple in it, they could begin "converting" the populace to their own culture... perhaps without having to destroy the original temple and either a) enraging the populace or b) simply losing its happiness benefit... (those are different... I hope I conveyed why)
... could be interesting? (likely wishful thinking though...)
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14. Apolyton Time is 00:14. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|