 |
|
Austin the Iron Fisted
|
|
Lubbock,Tx,America,Do you care?
Aug 2000
time: 05:12
|
|
Ive been playing on MSN game zone for a while now. Everyone I play against is like a great tactition and civ player! What do I do to beat them?! should I try to over run them with a BIG attack force? Or should I try to beat them to the space race?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Do your best and if that fails, plead faulty Internet line or cheat.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
You must be learning a lot in the game we're playing now 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
My Wife Hates CIV
|
|
Michigan
Jan 1970
time: 05:12
|
|
Get a laptop (or any second PC). During turns save the game. Move the saved game over to the second PC and take a look at the whole map. You should now be able to win.
oh, but I guess some would consider this cheating... whiners! Half of the people on the zone do this anyway, why do you think they always win??
|
|
| |
|
|
|
inca911
|
|
St. Paul, MN
Jan 2000
time: 05:12
|
|
Well, here are a few pointers from my excellent golf pro that apply to learning and improving performance in general:
1. Most important: Analyze your performance and identify areas to improve. Target those areas for practice.
2. Set goals.
3. Practice with feedback to aid learning.
4. Assess your performance against your goals.
5. Lather, Rinse, and repeat this process over and over setting new goals accordingly.
So, RAH outlined some very nice general civ goals. Unlike golf, you will be able to practice during your playtime and your feedback will be obvious. However, since analyzing your performance is the key to improving try to be clear as to what your problems are:
Is your treasury smaller than your opps making you an economic weakling? If so, you might want to consider more active trading for gold bonus, or build markets over temples to lower maintenance costs, or build more trade routes.
Are you militarily overmatched? Is it due to superior technology or superior numbers? If it is tech, you want to more closely monitor the science and tech tree. More trading for needed techs may be in order or you may be racing down a less beneficial tech path than your opps. If you have too few units but a big treasury, perhaps you are not doing enough incremental buying of units to build your army faster.
Are you losing the races to the key wonders? Perhaps you want to output more shields throughout your civ or stockpile some caravans for Wonder building instead of trade routes.
You must determine what is causing you to lose your games, keep track of it, and work to improve those areas. Just getting beat does not make you learn anything except how to lose graciously!
In my early Civ days, I used to have problems with happiness control on Deity. So I focused on the problem by building temples earlier and by increasing the importance I placed on HG. Now my treasury was too small for my liking, so I switched to building Markets instead of Temples, and didn't put all my caravans towards less valuable Wonders and instead used them for continued trade and the gold and Sci bonus. With all the focus on trade, now my military wasn't big enough, so I started more incremental rush buying of units with my larger treasury. Now, my treasury was shrinking again! I started incremental rush buying of caravans for better gold bonus. And so on and so on....
You may simply be up against a bunch of tactical cheaters and there's nothing you can do about that, but by identifying WHY you lose is crucial to your future winning success. Do you have any more ideas or specifics as to how you are losing? Perhaps with some more info, we can help you identify a strategy for improvement....
[This message has been edited by inca911 (edited August 01, 2000).]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
tobyr
|
|
Princeton, NJ USA
Oct 1999
time: 05:12
|
|
Austin,
Chances are that the people who beat you are better players in many, many little ways, rather than better in a few easy-to-describe big ways. Civ2 is a game with an extraordinary number of techniques that can be learned to play better. Smash's advice (above) reflects this idea that there is an awful lot of different things to learn.
If you do look through the strategy topics, you will find some that make more sense to you now than others. Try improving with these first, and then take another look later -- with more experience, some of the other advice will make more sense. If you keep integrating new ideas and undertanding into your play, you will have to improve a lot, and maybe catch your opponents.
Hydey (above) has an important point also. No strategy guide will give you the intuitive feeling you will need to decide what constitutes enough offense or defense, and when it's safe to shift away from defense to speed research. You also have to build a lot of cities to learn what are good layouts and what are weak ones.
There's a good way to speed up your intuitive learning process. When you have to make decisions, think hard about the CONTEXT in which you are making these decisions, and then note whether they work well or not. The hundredth time you think about whether it would be a good idea to postpone building a city wall, you should be subconsciously comparing this game situation to similar situations in which you had to make the same decision. You can only make these comparisons effectively (and intiutively) if you paid attention to the details of similar game situations in the past.
- toby
- toby
------------------
toby robison
criticalpaths@mindspring.com
|
|
| |
|
|
|
inca911
|
|
St. Paul, MN
Jan 2000
time: 05:12
|
|
Thanks for the kind words, rah. You are absolutely correct that the #1 goal for any civ game should be Monarchy ASAP. After that, opinons should and do differ, but I've never seen any convincing argument showing Monarchy late is better than Monarchy early!!!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Austin the Iron Fisted
|
|
Lubbock,Tx,America,Do you care?
Aug 2000
time: 05:12
|
|
I cant really pinpoint the exact problem. I think it is that I have only played a few multiplayer games and those didnt last beyond 1000 BC, so I havent had enough playing time to know what im being beaten in. Am I asking for help to soon? one time I think the problem was just bad luck. It was 2000 BC and I had no income and my science was discoveries every 15 turns, and I had the science as high as it could go!
[This message has been edited by Austin the Iron Fisted (edited August 01, 2000).]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DaveV
|
 |
USA - EDT (GMT-5)
Jan 1970
time: 00:12
|
|
I think most games are decided by 1000 BC. If you're facing a "better civer" and are behind by that point, your long-term outlook is bleak.
My tips for the early game:
1) Don't build *any* city improvements. These siphon off money, and consume shields that could be used to build more cities. Eventually, you can turn perfectionist, but two more cities will give a far greater early payoff than a library or marketplace. Don't get me started on temples.
2) Don't irrigate or mine with your settlers; instead, use them to build more cities. Keep your cities out of disorder with garrison troops. Try to situate every city to take advantage of at least one special resource square. Build on good defensive terrain (rivers, hills, mountains) if you're playing a "no city bribe" game.
3) Explore the map, and pop lots of huts. Sometimes you'll find barbarians or techs you didn't want, but the outcome is good more often than bad. Once you find your opponent, establish an embassy. Knowledge is power.
4) Best specials for war: Sun Tzu and Great Wall. Hanging Gardens is indispensable for sleazing at Deity difficulty level.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Hey Austin, played Hydey yet? Guaranteed big ego boost for ya 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Austin the Iron Fisted
|
|
Lubbock,Tx,America,Do you care?
Aug 2000
time: 05:12
|
|
I ALLWAYS build the Hanging Gardens. so u are saying big early on expansion is vital? Ok. I think I understand most things, like how important trade is. But one thing. What about building happiness improvements? should I build them early on, or should I wait until the first signs of unhappiness? note:I am playing on prince and king level right now
[This message has been edited by Austin the Iron Fisted (edited August 01, 2000).]
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Novi Nomad
|
|
Novi, MI, 48377
Jun 2000
time: 05:12
|
|
Just curious, at what point do your goals change from expansion to improving your cities and building armies? Obviously it is key early in the game to expand as rapidly as possible. At some point though, you will need to at least pick up a few wonders. If I've got a city that is producing more than four gold, I usually build a marketplace. If I've got a city producing four beakers, I usually pop in a library. Is this really a mistake? I've never really cared too much for the whole ICS strategy, it just isn't my style.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
cavebear
|
 |
of the Pleistocene
Oct 1999
time: 00:12
|
|
Austin - I'm not sure that you are getting the kind of advice you need. It's good advice, to be sure, but I think much of it misses your needs.
1. Play your peers and those slightly better than you. You can't really learn much or experiment usefully if you play against people who can just obliterate you routinely.
2. Understand the differences between strategy, tactics, and implementation skills.
Strategy is an approach to winning a game or a goal to be sought. It might be achieving naval strength if you start on islands, or it may be achieving tech growth through trade. Strategy is a general plan.
Tactics are the specific moves/units/advantages to effectuate a strategy. If you want to implement a strategy of island colonization, then some tactics might be to acquire advanced ships, trade to be transported on those ships, and attack competing transports. Similarly, you might have a strategy of maximizing the number of cities on large landmasses. In that case, your tactics might include maximizing the number of settlers produced and protecting your coastal cities and making sure that no one else establishes cities on your landmass.
Implementation skills is trickier. You can read all the tips and hints in the world, but they mean nothing if you can't implement them. Some are even contradictory (many cities, highly-developed cities). Try to decide on a few that are appropriate to the strategy you decide on in a game and follow through on them.
If you have a competing civ on your landmass and your strategy is to defend, then try the 2 settler idea of starting one to mine a hill and the second to build a city there. But, if your strategy is to quickly eliminate opponents in the same area, then don't build your cities that way. In other words, think about sets of ideas that work together, and stick to them until you have some experience in "pure" strategies/tactics.
3. I hate to say it this bluntly, but avoid people who "cheat". I don't mean that many people use 2 computers or have special software that creates gold from nothing, rather I mean people that have learned so many little tricks and bugs that they can easily confound a learning player of generally actual skill. The losing to them doesn't matter, and you might even win, but you won't learn much about your *own* game that way.
The important thing is to play people who are of a skill level to challenge you but are also playing a straight game that allows you to judge your success at trying ideas, strategies, and tactics.
------------------
Proud participant in GameLeague...
Proud Warrior of the O.W.L. Alliance...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
i learned a strategy that i have never not used...
it is contrary to just about everyone else's...
i go for Monarchy first, but i get horseback riding before it...
you can explore twice as fast then with a warrior...
more exploring means you get more of a look at your terrain to plan your next cities...
then your not "stuck" with crappy land...
you get huts quickly, and usually find your opponent before he/she finds you...
build warriors until horseback, then two horses, then settlers...after two settlers pick a wonder or build an army.do this with your first 5 cities, then build caravans, dips and a bigger army...
after monarchy, fuedalism, trade, then invention...
by this time a zone player will quit or get booted offline..and you win!
this would be a "normal" game...
minor adjustments for barbs, close neighbors and getting stuck on an island...
------------------
Proudly Sayen, what about you?
Master of My Domain...
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12.
Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
31-07-2000 20:42
)
|