 |
|  |
 |
|
Henrik
|
 |
The European Union, Sweden, Lund
Dec 2000 time: 06:14
|
|
I will use Civ2 for several months after Civ 3 has been released, simply becouse I ave to wait for it to be ported for the Mac.
So when i buy it I will probably know pretty much what I will be getting, since I guess there will be a lot of fuzz about it over here at Apolyton 
Whatever the general conclusion will be I will buy it.
I do think that perhaps there wont be so many improvements to it, it will be better than Civ 2 in many areas, also for scenario designing, Civ 2 wasn't built to be tweaked for special scenarios, there was just an included ability to change stuff, if you edited the text files, there was a cheat menu made for scenario designing, but it was never intended that you should change the game files or have "events".
Those things came in later, which is why there are tons of stuff that either:
- Doesn't work as they are supposed to
- Is hardcoded
- Is never explained and is illogicaly placed in menus and such
- Must still be changed in the original game files
The new game will be built whit the scenario design thing in mind, a lot of things that where impossible or very hard to change in the original game will be quite easy to change in Civ 3 (for example the leaders faces...).
Plus the beloved change of support cost from shields to gold and a lot of simmilar changes to game play which will make the game in general and certainly also scenarios a lot more realistic (In your case Jesús think of how big an improvement only the new gold support would be for your thirty years war scenario! Finnaly nations will lose money due to their large armies!).
Not to mention the ability to use leaders (whit names) to form stacks (or armies that they call them).
Civ III will be a big improvement, perhaps not as big as it could be (they could do lots of more stuff) but still a very big improvement for scenario designers (and players in general).
And animated units are not a must, you can use non animated units in scenarios (as Firaxis keep pointing out).
I do think that people will still play Civ 2, but eventually as whit Civ 1 the new game will take over the large masses (if there isn't some huge bug(s?) in the game that will render it unplayable in which case civ3 probably will be treated as "another" CTP).
Somehow I ended up defending Civ 3 here...
Strange...
Well all that I wrote is true annyway 
Last edited by Henrik on 05-07-2001 at 00:28
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14. Apolyton Time is 00:14. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|