 |
|
|
yah, the first game is always the best
I will be playing a very simple game, start right from the beginning, easiest level, medium amount of civs, and hopefully begin on an island, and play the game extremely slow.
The ONLY thing I really hope for though, is that I don't get annoyed with anything, as soon as I get annoyed with one thing, I will feel disappointed. And I hate that 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yin26
|
 |
This space reserved for Darkstar.
Apr 1999 time: 14:14
|
|
I'll momentarily stop whatever good game I am playing (Tropico?) and read the first reviews. No doubt they will be glowing. SMAC got a 98% from Gamespot (their highest score ever?), which is a travesty. So after reading about how much they love all the fluff but of course didn't REALLY play the game, I'll sit back and wait for the first bug reports to show up (could take up to an hour).
Now, those bug reports will have a great deal of meaning to me. If, for example, regular missiles have infinite range, I'll decide right then and there NEVER to play Civ 3. That particular one is a personal issue for me.
I'll also listen to people very carefully as they discuss the AI. If the AI can't really handle all the cool and neat stuff, I'll decide right then and there NEVER to play Civ 3 since Civ 3 MP has almost no appeal to me whatsoever.
Finally, I'll be watching Firaxis like a hawk. They'll make their usual appearances here for a few weeks to stoke the euphoria, but I'll be watching the actual OUTPUT from Firaxis in those crucial early days. I'll be particularly interested in how quickly and with how much sincerity they take up the community's first bug reports and feature requests.
And if past events are any judge, it won't be pretty.
Oh, and bonus activity: The very first "It's not our code but your system" comment from Firaxis will cause me not only to NOT buy Civ 3 but also anything from Firaxis ever again. Not a threat or anything. Just the time will have come to let the dead horse be dead forever.
So, there you have it. That's what I'll be doing in short bursts as I go back to playing a game (from a company) that already earned my time and respect.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
That's very positive of you yin
And in your quote, I remember you saying that, was that 99? boy time has flown so quickly, whose the dumbass who gave time wings anyway?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
yin26
|
 |
This space reserved for Darkstar.
Apr 1999 time: 14:14
|
|
TechWins:
A good question. Yes, SMAC and the entire way it was handled post-release was a horrible experience for me as a gamer, and I have seen nothing change on the PR side. I fully understand, of course, most people let various things slide and enjoyed the game for what it is. Gettysburg was outstanding, so no complaints there. Civ 2 wasn't a "Firaxis Production," and the guy who programmed it left...and Sid is busy watching tiny golfers play on tiny little hills next to tiny fountains.
It's safe to say that I'm not AGAINST Civ3. I'm against the kind of PR that was behind SMAC and that seems even worse this time around. And by PR, I mean how patches and so forth are handled in addition to just the general "Please the customer" stuff. But if the feedback here is good from the people I trust most, then I'll happily buy the game if all the other lights are green, so to speak.
For me, it's not a money issue but an avoiding frustration issue. And a lackluster, poorly supported Civ 3 would send me through the roof. I hope, of course, that won't happen.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
I'm sure you will buy the game just to experience it on your behalf, no matter what anyone else says. Everyones experience with games is different enough to make the 'try it out' worth a go.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14. Apolyton Time is 00:14. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|