 |
|
LewsTherin
|
|
Germany
Jul 2001 time: 06:14
|
|
Yes, but I would prefer a sequel to SMAC(X).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Beckdawg
|
|
proud member of OfAPeCiClu(THE DARK SIDE) I am know as the "loyal drunkard" of the group
May 2001 time: 23:14
|
|
I would be interested in a civ style game totally online. You could start a new world with some friends or you could join a world already created. You also could have thousands of countries and a huge map. And instead of having year/month turns they could be like days. It would be more realistic than the Civ games so far. You would have to include a lot more tech's and units but i think it would be fun. Also with the huge map(like at least 30 as big as you can get normal maps) you wouldn't have a smarter country picking on one with less tech's as much. Also if you did lose to a bigger country you could still play. If they were democratic you could run for election vs. the countries president and if your former cities had a larger population you would be elected. You could also throw coups if the leader was hated so much or if he didn't support the military enough and things like that. This is the problem with past Civ games IMO because once you conquer a country they support you without any hatered. I have been recently talking with a friend about everquest(i think that is what it is called i have never played it) and in that game you build a warrior and can build different kinds of warriors. This lead me to thinking about this kind of Civ game. It would be a totally different kind of MP game because there would almost never be a winner(because of the size of the game and all) and it would be almost like the real world with all the different people. The only problem i can think of is what happens when you are off line. well you could have your cities auto produce units and buildings and what not and when you get attacked you allies would have to help you and if they are offline they would have to set there units to protect you in case of an attack or something like that. Also, it couldn't be a turn based game i don't think because it woudl take way too long, but if it was real time it would work. I really think this could be a fun game, but that is just my opinion. If you guys feel the same way post and who knows maybe we can start a new civ style game
Last edited by Beckdawg on 30-07-2001 at 03:54
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tniem
|
|
Hope College
Apr 2000 time: 00:14
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Alex 14
DarkCloud Said:
I didn't think he made Magic: The Gathering?
I think Microprose did, but not Sid Meier personally. |
No, Sid definitely did make Magic: The Gathering. It was his final game at Microprose.
Did a quick check at Gamespot' Sid Legacy page and sure enough...
http://www.gamespot.com/features/sidlegacy/gather.html
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14. Apolyton Time is 00:14. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|