 |
|  |
 |
|
Heresson
|
 |
of frogs
Jun 2000 time: 06:14
|
|
It's a part of bigger question. But I'll ask about it anyway;
why Spaniards consider themselves descendants of Al-Andalus
and treat it as their tradition? Al-Andalus always fought
with the Spaniards, right? It had other language, other
religion, other culture, it was separate from christian
Spaniards. You'd say that Spaniards were influenced by
Al-Andalus. Mudejar style and so on. But does it make any
difference? Have Romans (I mean the early empire, not Byzantium),
that conquered Greece and were under its heavy cultural influence,
becomen by this its descendant? You would say that Arabic Syria
or Egypt (Iraq etc) are descendants of pre-moslem Syria and Egypt
and so on; but none of those countries was banning former citizens
of those regions, the Christian and Moslem citizens of those states
were never fighting each other, those states were never divided into
a Christian and a Moslem part (Outremer states weren't origin states)
and Spain did; the true descendant of Al-Andalus are the African states
that welcomed the fleeding. Spain, as the one that destroyed this culture,
can't regard itself as it's continuation in any BIGGER part.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jay Bee
|
 |
Valladolid, CA
Jan 1970 time: 06:14
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Heresson
It's a part of bigger question. But I'll ask about it anyway;
why Spaniards consider themselves descendants of Al-Andalus
and treat it as their tradition? |
Do they? Oh my! Where have I been all those years?
quote: Al-Andalus always fought
with the Spaniards, right? |
Wrong. Al-Andalus fought against the Christians. The Al-Andalusi were as Spanish as the Castilians, the Aragonese or the Navarres 
quote: It had other language, other
religion, other culture, it was separate from christian
Spaniards. You'd say that Spaniards were influenced by
Al-Andalus. Mudejar style and so on. But does it make any
difference? |
It may be only me but I think that does make a HUGE difference. For example, bullfighting, guitar, flamenco... some of the things that make Spain nowadays so identifiable were, in all or in part, taken from the Arabs. Oh, and the Spanish language is heavily (heavily, heavily) influenced by the Arabic.
quote: Have Romans (I mean the early empire, not Byzantium),
that conquered Greece and were under its heavy cultural influence, becomen by this its descendant? |
It may be only me again but, I'd say yes of course. Without BOTH Greece and Rome there would not have been Spain at all (not the way we know it today).
quote: the true descendant of Al-Andalus are the African states that welcomed the fleeding. Spain, as the one that destroyed this culture, can't regard itself as it's continuation in any BIGGER part. |
Mixing apples and oranges. Your premise has been wrong from the beginning. Spain (whatever that may mean here) has never claimed to be the continuation of Al-Andalus. That modern Spain, particularly from Toledo to Gibraltar is heavily influenced by Al-Andalus is so obvious that needs no comment.
(PS. Nice troll, Maciej, I enjoyed it )
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Heresson
|
 |
of frogs
Jun 2000 time: 06:14
|
|
Do they? Oh my! Where have I been all those years?
In USA? 
Do we?
Don't You?
Haven't You made your Spanish scenarios about it,
Jesus? You could say that it is just a part of history of
Christian states. But then the scenario wouldn't be named "Al-Andalus";
it's like i would make a scenario about X_X-century Poland and would name it
"russia and germany" then 
I could sence pride of Al-Andalus' achievements
in your texts, too.
Anyway, You say yourself;
The Al-Andalusi were as Spanish as
the Castilians, the Aragonese or the Navarres
While I think they weren't.
that's what the thread is about.
700 years are too many years.
if so, You shouldn't feel descendant of anything that old 
It may be only me but I think that does make a HUGE difference. For example,
bullfighting, guitar, flamenco... some of the things that make Spain nowadays so
identifiable were, in all or in part, taken from the Arabs. Oh, and the Spanish
language is heavily (heavily, heavily) influenced by the Arabic.
And what? What identified Poles against some was Oriental influence.
that we were using Turkish weapons and wearing Turkish suits, and
so on. Does it mean that Poles are descendants of Turkish tradition?
We were also under Ukrainian and Byelorussian influence. in fact,
almost all Polish greatest poethes, artists, scientists came from
the lands that now aren't Poland anymore, and had some Byelorussian/
Ukrainian/Jewish/German roots.
One renown guy even said that Poland is Vilnius, Miñsk, Kiev, Lwów.
And Warsaw? "A silly Jewish town on the German border".
Does it mean that we are descendants of all Eastern Slavic culture?
Or Jewish? Or German?
It may be only me again but, I'd say yes of course. Without BOTH Greece and Rome
there would not have been Spain at all (not the way we know it today).
As any other state/nation 
Spain (whatever that may mean here) has never claimed to be the
continuation of Al-Andalus.
I don't say that. It's obvious that some Isabela didn't want to
be descendants of Andalus. But don't You consider Al-Andalus
a part of your history rather than foreign agressor?
PS. Nice troll, Maciej, I enjoyed it
Yes? So there'll be no more of stuff like this 
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14. Apolyton Time is 00:14. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|