 |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Martinus
New Civ of the week - Egyptians - are up on the Civ 3 site.
2. It seems that chariots have now 1 attack strength. Probably they are weaker than cavalry then (which comes later on the tech tree). Do you think it is ok? |
There a lot of if's.
A one man chariot could be weaker if it has no weapons attached to the Chariot. A two man Chariot should be stronger because one can drive and one can use a bow or spear or any other type of weapon that was available then.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dauphin
|
 |
Caught in a tuna net
Jan 1970 time: 05:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by KrazyHorse
it was easier to hitch a horse up to a chariot than it was to have to climb on its back. . |
According to the History channel or Discovery Civilization channel, in the early days before horses were being bred for specific tasks they were often not strong enough to carry the weight of a man and weapons on its back. So pulling things was a horses early use. Once the horses of the steppes had been bred with strong enough backs for people to mount, the horse became the dominant battlefield unit.
Maybe I missed something though, because it doesn't sound right to me. Can anyone confirm this?
Last edited by Dauphin on 17-08-2001 at 23:56
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|