 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
I build a bridge to get me units move with ease through the river.
It gave me an extra arrow too! In rep and demo 2 arrows more for a grand total of 4 arrows on a normal river square with road!
Is my civ 2 copy bugged?
P.S. Manual says railroads (not raods of course) increase only the shield output... altought I don't trust it generally.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
While we are waiting for the EST's test let me just say that: THE MANUAL SUCKS. Where are the glories of Civ 1 manual. I remember I've read it a thousand times and I found only very few and minor inconsistencies with the game.
After all that time of playing I've only recently discovered the river extra trading arrow because I was relying on the manual.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote:

Originally posted by Ribannah on 02-08-2001 07:26 PM
The poster gives a clear overview of the effects of roads etc. One plus one makes two, there is no special counting rule for rivers. The result is also obvious from the city map.
My point is, that while some game manuals do suck bigtime, the manual of Civ2 is more than adequate, and they made a great effort to add in-game info as well.
 |
I disagree, the manual is really mediocre. This is the point of view of someone who has a clear knowledge of the Civ 1 manual where everything was in place and it even had a pleasant reference to relative historical facts to go with the PRECISE info.
It is the same with Civ 2. The improvements in the game are really nice but the overall feeling and atmosphaire is inferior to civ 1. (newspapers, sequences when you catpured a city, no nosence city view etc)
About one and one makes two, this is not the case here.
If I remember correctly bridged rivers in civ 1 didn't yield that nice extra arrow. Continuity princess! Hang on to my civ 1 knowledge 1 plus 1 makes 2,5 or 1,5 take your pick!
In civ 2 manual I have to search the whole thing to find the info I'd want because that damn book is as unorganised as your average greek public service institution!
City map is so obvious you miss the info!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Albert B
|
 |
Indianapolis, IN USA
Dec 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Paiktis, I think you have a trait common to most people, which is we tend to remember the past being better than it was. I can't give much of an argument as to whether the civ 1 or civ 2 manual is better but I can tell you that the civ 1 manual was far from flawless. I don't think I ever read the civ 1 manual, I learned to play by playing with a friend already slightly familiar with the game and then used a lot of trial and error. (This actually was a lot of fun as my friend or I would occasionally make 'grand discoveries', like finally finding out that there was a luxury rate as well as the normal tax/science , but I digress.) The point is that eventually I picked up a strategy guide and it pointed out a ton of mis-quoted facts, wrong information and various other deficiencies of the original manual. I don't have specifics right now because the guide is at home and I'm at work, but if you are interested in proof, I would be more than happy to look into it for you.
The real point of this: "the grass is always greener on the other side..." and to remember that the "golden years" weren't necessarily as golden as you may remember. Oh, and also, who needs the manual any more, there's far more knowledge right here on this web site than could ever be put in a single manual !!
Albert
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
debeest
|
|
There's a rivered hill square down by the Persian Gulf in the Rome scenario. Until recent games, I don't think I'd ever seen one anywhere else, but recently I've seen at least one in a completely randomly generated 2.42 game. They do occur naturally.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|