 |
|  |
 |
|
|
I have now played successfully deity/raging with ICS, OCC and perfectionist strategy. I want more challenge and I'm asking if anyone has tried this yet: give all techs you discover to all civs immediately!
At start the AI is quite good at researching new techs and gets them quite rapidly. But at some point I've seen that AI almost completely stalls at discovering new techs. Maybe because I really like to trade techs with them and offer them as gifts as well. So aggressive Mongols get all civilized techs and civilized Babylonians get the military ones which those civs can't use for their own benefit. The result: the AI's preferable research path gets totally jammed because of the increased need for sciense beakers.
So, what do you think? Would this give us more competent AI?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
Gits, I'd love to try giga map! If you have got the patch please send it to my email! Thanks in advance!
Btw, I only have 2.42 version of the game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ChrisShaffer
|
 |
Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America
Aug 1999 time: 23:12
|
|
That's very very strange - I posted a reply here a few days ago and now it's gone. I thought it was impossible for other people to delete my messages???
It described what I call my peacekeeper challenge, which goes as follows, and is very hard to win:
1) Large world, large land mass, continents, warm, wet, 5 billion years, raging hordes, deity, 7 civs.
2) I do not build Wonders.
3) I give the AI all technologies for free - no trading.
4) I don't attack the AI unless they are actively attacking my cities or units (though I do expel diplomats).
5) I do not bribe AI units or cities, nor do I steal technologies.
6) I have to find the AI - I can't sit back on my island and play alone.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
Theben, I actually tried something like 'bloodlust OCC' for fun after my first and only true OCC game. I landed to AC year 1894 and then wanted to try conquering just for fun. I was amazed how easy it was.. my capitol produced a howie one turn and the AI had all his cities railroaded.. I rushbought barracks and more howies in the conquered cities and after 15 turns I had destroyed 3 AI civs and all the main cities of the rest civs. Then I got bored and went to bed.. has anyone else tried OCC bloodlust?
[This message has been edited by Marko_Polo (edited January 27, 2001).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
KhanMan
|
|
Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:12
|
|
Well, there's one challenge you might try that many people have contributed to here: Nomads Challenge.
The hardest version is this: you can never use a settler to build a city. Your only ways of acquiring cities are two:
1) good huts giving an advanced tribe
2) conquering a city with goody hut units (or, later, units you have built)
To make things tough, play on diety, raging, seven civs...if you want to be REALLY sadistic, try doing it as an OCC 
-KhanMan
PS. Last I heard, Ming and RAH had some good results with this challenge...but they're the kind of guys who invented the "spaceship landing on 1 AD" challenge 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
|
I tried 'bloodlust OCC' and played all night it (I have slept only three hours )
I had small map, 7 civs, deity/raging and my city had wine, gold, iron and buffalo-specials. There was three 'extra' mountains as well so my engineers had to work hard to terraform them to plains. My final city size was 32. At year 1890 I had my 100% space ship ready to my launch command. Then I started the funniest part of my game, THE CONQUEST!
After playing 20 turns (1910AD) I have conquered Sioux who iust before 1890 had conquered Persia. I've also took all the main big cities of the most powerful civ, Babylonians and after I took his capitol, he was swept away to civil war and now I have also Mongols in my game 
I think that when I get home I launch my space ship and conquer the rest of world, trying to time the landing and conquest to the same year. IMO this is a quite fun challenge and not so difficult.
Btw, it's really incredible how effective a vet howie can be! It usually can kill two good defencing units (alpine/rifle) during the same turn. A mech inf isn't a problem either.
Secondly, the AI is quite pathetic with his cruise missiles; he loves to build them but I haven't seen him to use them to the land targets at all. To my experience he uses them only to naval targets. But if he must build them, a good target would be my four howies beside his city when they have been used to blow up the city defences 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
rixxe
|
|
Lausanne
Dec 2000 time: 06:12
|
|
I think the hardest challenge would be :
1. Playing on the world map with the English, Deity, RHordes,....
2. Against the French, the Spanish, the Roman, the Mongols, the Americans, and the Babylonians
3. Starting with one settler
4. Just Road, Mining, and Irrigation as free sciences.
Good Luck
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
quote:

Originally posted by rixxe on 01-30-2001 03:52 AM
I think the hardest challenge would be :
1. Playing on the world map with the English, Deity, RHordes,....
2. Against the French, the Spanish, the Roman, the Mongols, the Americans, and the Babylonians
3. Starting with one settler
4. Just Road, Mining, and Irrigation as free sciences.
Good Luck
 |
Rixxe, in deity I always have two settlers, so I should disband my second immediately? Should I win by world conquest or AC landing? Have you tried this yourself?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
rixxe
|
|
Lausanne
Dec 2000 time: 06:12
|
|
quote:

Originally posted by Lars-E on 01-30-2001 08:24 AM
Here's a suggestion, not really a new challenge though, but a fun way to play civ:
Let a friend start a game and play until 1 AD. Then you get a copy and both of you play it from there. Two separate games. Compare every 500 year or so and see how each one is doing. If you like you could set goals like:
1. 1st one to conquer the world
2. 1st to AC
This is fun , but you could also learn something from it - looking at the other guy's moves or mistakes. And your own as well.
 |
Yeah, I was doing that some years ago, before getting CivII - Multiplayer. But were starting in 4000BC, checking for the demographic chart every x # of turns. It was fun....
quote:

Originally posted by Marko_Polo on 01-30-2001 04:53 AM
Rixxe, in deity I always have two settlers, so I should disband my second immediately? Should I win by world conquest or AC landing? Have you tried this yourself?
 |
No I've never tried to start in this situation, exactly, but I'm not sure you always start with 2 settlers in deity, with the english (the civ with which i usually play)
I'll try it tonight, and i'll post a screen shot of the demographic chart.... 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
La Fayette
|
|
albi, france
Oct 2000 time: 06:12
|
|
Have you tried the scenario named Rome that goes with the game ?
I suppose it was designed by the authors of the game and I find it GREAT (because you start with one of seven civs around the Mediterranian, each civ with its own abilities and there are neither goodie huts nor new wonders apart from the "historical" ones).
I would be very happy to know whether strong ICSers or OCCers have tried it and what they have achieved (personally I am fighting hard to manage winning in less than 100 years; have come close to it but not yet beaten it).
------------------
aux bords mystérieux du monde occidental
|
|
|  |
 |
|
La Fayette
|
|
albi, france
Oct 2000 time: 06:12
|
|
I did it!
89 turns.
I start a new topic ("delenda est...") to discuss that.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|