 |
| |
|
|
kolpo
|
|
A group of villages, without cities, without big buildings, without much influence in any period of historey(they where nothing more then an anoying bug in comparrison with the military power and tech level of England)
I think they would be better represented with some goody huts.
Just for the American natives are there at least 2 other not included civs who where more advanced: incas and mayas.
Which wonder build the Iroquois? Wich important tech invented the Iroquois ? Wich important enemy did they ever beat without colonial help ? which important cities did they build? Is there religion or culture still alive in a big country? To all those answers is the answer no. Quite all other civs(except Zulus) can at least answer some of the questions with yes.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kolpo
|
|
oke didn't know that but that makes the Iroquois even more barbaric as the only civ who can't answer any of those questions.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ribannah
|
 |
The Netherlands, Embassy of the Iroquois Confederacy
Aug 2000
time: 06:15
|
|
From the Iroquois Constitution:
93. Whenever a specially important matter or a great emergency is presented before the Confederate Council and the nature of the matter affects the entire body of the Five Nations, threatening their utter ruin, then the Lords of the Confederacy must submit the matter to the decision of their people and the decision of the people shall affect the decision of the Confederate Council. This decision shall be a confirmation of the voice of the people.
Thus the Iroquois laid the foundation of modern Democracy.
The reason the Iroquois did not have cities is a simple one: until later in the 20th century, they never counted more than 25,000 citizens. Yet they were able to defeat all rival native tribes in battle.
In their relations with the Europeans, they were masters in diplomacy. One war they could not avoid was when their allies at the time, the French, waged war with the English for control over Canada. Alongside the French, they beat the English everywhere they went until the tide turned and the English started to crush the French. The Iroquois then made sure to switch alliances in time.
South of the border, unfortunately, as allies of the British they did not fare well in the American revolution and were driven back to their homelands.
Last edited by Ribannah on 24-08-2001 at 20:00
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ribannah
|
|
The Netherlands, Embassy of the Iroquois Confederacy
Aug 2000
time: 06:15
|
|
You are making it too easy, KrazyHorse 
"During the bi-centennial year of The Constitution of the United States, a number of books were written concerning the origin of that long-revered document. One of these, The Genius of the People, alleged that after the many weeks of debate a committee sat to combine the many agreements into one formal document. The chairman of the committee was John Rutledge of South Carolina. He had served in an earlier time, along with Ben Franklin and others, at the Stamp Act Congress, held in Albany, New York. This Committee of Detail was having trouble deciding just how to formalize the many items of discussion into one document that would satisfy one and all. Rutledge proposed they model the new government they were forming into something along the lines of the Iroquois League of Nations, which had been functioning as a democratic government for hundreds of years, and which he had observed in Albany. While there were many desirable, as well as undesirable, models from ancient and modern histories in Europe and what we know now as the Middle East, only the Iroquois had a system that seemed to meet most of the demands espoused by the many parties to the debates."
Edit: further down ...
"Some sources place the origin of the Five Nation Confederacy as early as 1390 AD, but others insist it was prepared about 1450-1500 AD; in any case, it was well before any possible contamination by European invaders. Early explorers and colonists found the Iroquois well established, as they had been for many generations: with a democratic government; with a form of religion that acknowledged a Creator in heaven; with a strong sense of family which was based on, and controlled by, their women; and many other surprises you will soon discover."
Last edited by Ribannah on 24-08-2001 at 20:28
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:15
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by KrazyHorse
"Standard decision-making process". How many laws are passed per year? How many do you vote on?
Ribannah, note how the word "alleged" is used. The facts themselves are apparently in doubt here.
Now, reading through the actual document, the form of government seems more feudal than democratic. Lordships are hereditary, with the exception of "Pine Tree Lords", but these non-hereditary positions are elected by the hereditary lords. I don't see the democracy here. Where is the provision for a general election on the lines of "one woman, one vote"?
The leaders were selected from a small group of important families, and the only "democratic" provisions I see are in the form of non-binding opinions which delegates from "the people" may present to the War Council.
If anything, the document more resembles Magna Carta than the Constitution of the United States. |
The iroqouis may not have been democratic - they WERE federal. It is widely held here that they influenced the federal structure of the US constitution. When the constitution was formulated most Republican models were unitary not federal - ie ancient Athens and Rome, Venice, the Netherlands. Switzerland was federal, but did not have central structures that seemed to fit the needs of the US. Clearly the Iroqouis league did serve as a model, at least to some extent.
LOTM
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ribannah
|
|
The Netherlands, Embassy of the Iroquois Confederacy
Aug 2000
time: 06:15
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Ribannah, note how the word "alleged" is used. The facts themselves are apparently in doubt here. |
You did not pay attention. The author, who put in the word "alleged", still agreed about the part of the Iroquois being democratic. The "alleged" bit refers to a bit of (possible) mystification with regard to events in USA history, not the Iroquois history.
quote:
Now, reading through the actual document, the form of government seems more feudal than democratic. |
Not feudal, as there was no monarch, but federal, like the USA who copied their example. Neither Feudalism nor Federalism are government types by themselves.
quote:
Where is the provision for a general election on the lines of "one woman, one vote"? |
There isn't, they used a different system of choosing representatives.
quote:
The leaders were selected from a small group of important families, and the only "democratic" provisions I see are in the form of non-binding opinions which delegates from "the people" may present to the War Council. |
You missed the part where anyone has equal opportunity of BECOMING the first of an "important family". The family gains importance BECAUSE it contributes to the tribe's politics.
quote:
If anything, the document more resembles Magna Carta than the Constitution of the United States. |
The Magna Carta, as such, is on the path to modern democracy. The tree runs like: Feudalism + Theology -> Trias Politica, + Nationalism -> Democracy. So the resemblance is a logical one, the constitution of the USA also has much in common with the Magna Carta.
What is interesting is how much the constitution of the USA resembles that of the Iroquois - not the other way around, as the Iroquois were first.
 FORGET THE SPANISH LOVE HIAWATHA
Last edited by Ribannah on 24-08-2001 at 22:25
|
|
| |
|
|
|
YefeiPi
|
|
Canada
Jul 2001
time: 00:15
|
|
Ancient
quote:
Put in the Spanish, and kick out the Iroquois |
How about we kick you out? But seriously, we have way too much European civs already, it's not like every one of them had an important impact on the history of mankind. I say we can take the Spanish but get rid of another European civ.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ribannah
|
|
The Netherlands, Embassy of the Iroquois Confederacy
Aug 2000
time: 06:15
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by lord of the mark
Of course hiawatha wasnt iroqouis, living as she did by the shining big sea water (lake superior, IIRC) |
Er ... she? Some mix-up with little Pocahontas? 
Hiawatha was chief of the Mohawks IIRC, one of the five tribes.
The most famous Iroquois leader is perhaps Sagoyewatha, one of the greatest Amerind orators. He lived around 1800.
quote:
right now the tech tree looks like late republic + federalism + seperation of powers (trias politica?) = US constitutionalism + egalitarianism/nationalism = democracy. |
So many trees
I still prefer the one I planted, Tree69
quote:
Counter argument to iroqois contrib is that 18thc Netherlands was already federal. Any info rib? For myself i had heard the story that founders looked to iroquois, no awareness that they looked at dutch federal institutions. |
Both the Dutch and the French had extensive relationships with the Iroquois from the beginning of the 17th century, when the Dutch were still in the middle of creating a nation (the power was with the cities, not the provinces) taking their time - profits were much more important . They, and the French a bit slower (between wars), may have learned a lot from the Iroquois - not just about federacies and roots of democracy, but also about family values, diplomacy, human rights.
Last edited by Ribannah on 25-08-2001 at 01:16
|
|
| |
|
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by monkspider
I am very much in agreement with Ribannah in this discussion. The Iroquois were a very distinct group of people with a very distinct culture and the point of Civ 3 is not to relive history, but to rewrite it. Perhaps in another world, in another time, in another plain of reality the Iroquois ruled the world. |
Dido the above statement and all of the other statement that supported the Iroquois and other Indians tribe of the America's.
What I don't understand is why is it so important for one civ to go out and conquer other Civs. We call Rome and Egypt great Civs because they conquer the know world in their day. However we do not call Germany under Hitler Great for trying to conquer the world in his day.
In the America's except for the Aztec, Myans, and Inca's no other tribe had a leader that stood up one and said let's go out and conquer every tribe between the Mississippi and East Coast, or west of Rockies to the Pacific etc.
The Hopi have lived on the same land for 1,300 years, so why are they a civ? The Iroquois league lasted some 370 years, so why are they a civ?
The Sioux roamed the Great Plains for thousand of years, why are they a civ also?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Steve Clark
|
 |
Colorado Springs, CO
Oct 1999
time: 22:15
|
|
You guys are missing the obvious answer as to why the Iroqouis are in...geography. They are the only civ in US and Canada to counterbalance the Americans. In South America, you have the Meso-American nations represented by the Aztecs, so what would you have North America along with the Americans? One could argue for the Plains Indians (Sioux) or the some of the mountain/desert tribes (Crows, Utes, Navajos, etc.), but the Iroqouis represents a nice placement (on a real world map) and a good, historically accurate civ for the American Revolution, Seven Years/French and Indian War, Colonial Wars scenarios. Plus, I grew up a few miles from the Onondaga Nation (Keepers of the Central Fire) reservation, so I have an affinity for the Five Nations.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001
time: 13:15
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Fiil
Even if the US constitution is somehow derived from the iroquois constitution, does that make the iroquois nation one of 16 most significant civilizations of history? |
As the information provided by Ribannah shows, the Iroquois provided the model for a federal state --domestic independence, but united on foreign policy -- that was copied by the Americans, Canadians, Dutch (?) and others.
It could be argued that the Iroquois federal system was later incorporated into the League of Nations and then into the United Nations and the EU.
If our world ever has a single government with true powers, it will likely be based on the Iroquois federal system.
The Iroquois developments of a federal system, and the concept of a written constitution outlining the rules of government, are so significant that it makes the Iroquios one of the most significant civs in history.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Fiil
|
 |
of the cold north
Aug 2001
time: 06:15
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Tingkai
As the information provided by Ribannah shows, the Iroquois provided the model for a federal state --domestic independence, but united on foreign policy -- that was copied by the Americans, Canadians, Dutch (?) and others.
It could be argued that the Iroquois federal system was later incorporated into the League of Nations and then into the United Nations and the EU.
If our world ever has a single government with true powers, it will likely be based on the Iroquois federal system.
The Iroquois developments of a federal system, and the concept of a written constitution outlining the rules of government, are so significant that it makes the Iroquios one of the most significant civs in history. |
If federal state simply is "domestic independence, but united on foreign policy" then medieval France and the Holy Roman Empire already had unofficial federal governments.
I can understand that people living in federal nations see this type of government as an achievement. It is a good system I guess, but isn't it a bit to much to say that it is only succesful system and that it will be like this forever.
Also, I think that you're giving credit to the wrong nations. The real achievement must be in implementing this system into nations covering millions of sq.miles with millions of citizens living in a modern world.
By the way if was common knowledge that the EU system had iroqouis/american roots several countries would leave the union at once. It is a very high priority in Europe not to make a USA2. (I don't share this vision, I think that EU indirectly learns from the US and I see this as a strengh.)
I did not know that the iroquois had a written constitution, did they really have their own alphabet and/or written language? If they did then this would surely make them a true civilization in my eyes.
Anyway I like the iroqouis in my completely unrealistic random map games.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001
time: 13:15
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Fiil
If federal state simply is "domestic independence, but united on foreign policy" then medieval France and the Holy Roman Empire already had unofficial federal governments.
|
But the difference is that the Iroquois officially divided power between the league (aka confederation) and the individual nations (aka tribes). In France and the Holy Roman Empire, the ruler had absolute power in theory, although in practice, you are correct that individual groups had power.
quote:
Originally posted by Fiil
I can understand that people living in federal nations see this type of government as an achievement. It is a good system I guess, but isn't it a bit to much to say that it is only succesful system and that it will be like this forever.
[QUOTE]
I wouldn't go so far as saying the federal system is the most successful. It is simply a system that allows individual nations to retain their authority domestically while belonging to a larger government. That is a more acceptable to people then a system where one government rules over the others (e.g. the Soviet Union). That's why it is likely to become the model for a single world government.
I would agree with you that even if a global federal government is created, whether it would last forever is a totally different question.
[QUOTE] Originally posted by Fiil
Also, I think that you're giving credit to the wrong nations. The real achievement must be in implementing this system into nations covering millions of sq.miles with millions of citizens living in a modern world.
|
Why? The Iroquois League showed European colonists in North America the benefits of federal government and written constitution. That led to its adoption by others. That makes it significant.
[QUOTE] Originally posted by Fiil
By the way if was common knowledge that the EU system had iroqouis/american roots several countries would leave the union at once. It is a very high priority in Europe not to make a USA2. (I don't share this vision, I think that EU indirectly learns from the US and I see this as a strengh.)
[QUOTE]
Denying reality doesn't change the facts, even if it makes their egos feel better.
[QUOTE] Originally posted by Fiil
I did not know that the iroquois had a written constitution, did they really have their own alphabet and/or written language? If they did then this would surely make them a true civilization in my eyes.
[QUOTE]
Their constitution was called the Great Wumpan (Sp?) Don't know much about it other than that.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
|
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:15
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Mark L
On the Dutch: Tventano wrote exactly what I was thinking. The whole federal system was around in Holland since the formation of the Union of Utrecht. Or perhaps even before that, when we were still under Spanish/Burgundian rule. Only after the Napoleonic wars did we get a "real" centralised governement like most nations.
On democracy: I do think the Greeks invented that long before the Iroquis.
On a federal governement: The Dutch, as has been pointed out, had "invented" this. However, one could argue that the Roman Empire had this structure too. Especcially before the Emporers appeared. A lot of provinces had their own leaders and kings, their own laws (just read the bilbe for examples) and even their own armies. Like Egypt under Cleoparta (though that wasn't a real province) or Judea under Agrippa (or whatever his name was). |
No roman republic was not federal, citizens outside the city of Rome were treated as members of tribes in the city, and had to show up in the city to vote, leading to domination of plebian assemblies by those resident in rome, who were subject to bribery by powerful leaders like Pompey or Julius Caesar. Ultimately this was one of the causes of the downfall of the Republic. And Egypt under Cleo, Judea under Herod the Great and later Herod Agrippa, Pontus, etc were not federal provinces - they were protectorates or puppet states - less like US states or Netherlands provinces, more like Indian Rajahs under British India, or like Poland and Czecho under Soviet rule.
LOTM
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15.
Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
24-08-2001 18:51
no offence to any native americans. 
|