 |
|
|
I'm just wondering if anyone here actually BUILD partisans? I've never done because to me it's pretty useless unit. With attack/defence 4/4 it's relatively weak unit.. isn't good for city assault. Maybe killing low-defence high-attack units like artillery/howies and catching barb kings.. or pillaging which I rarely do..
Well, what do you think of partisans?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
jcarkey
|
|
St. Louis
Aug 2000 time: 23:12
|
|
It's like the alpine horde. You can also lead units throught ZOC, too. Can't get enough of those non-partisans!
------------------
If someone doesn't agree with you, you haven't explained yourself well enough-Luther Ely Smith
She turned me into a newt...well I got better- Monty Python and the Quest for the Holy Grail
How many boards could the Mongols horde, if the Mongol hordes got bored?- jcarkey
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edward
|
|
Lefty Scaevola,
Very clever. Partisans are then created out of thin air requiring no resources. I can see how this would be faster (and cheaper) than waiting to bribe units that the barbarians build.
Marko_Polo,
I too never build parisans. Then again I don't do too much late game warfare. With a specific goal in mind, there's not much a partisan can do that a spy or alpine troop can't do better.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
George Garrett
|
 |
Victoria. B.C. Canada
May 1999 time: 21:12
|
|
I learned how effective NON partisans can be in a current game - quite early in the game,far from my Civ, my exploring horseman tipped a hut to find an advanced tribe...rather than have the settler wander forever back into my mainstream, I created a city on the spot, put it into Domestic Auto, then forgot about it.
Centuries later,I got into a war with the Mongols, and one of the many cities they attacked, was this "Shantytown"- and the only one they took, along with an early, nondescript advance and a mere handful of gold.
Since I habitually bestow lotsa TLC on my defenses, and seldom lose a city, I saved the game to find out why-I'd forgotten that the horseman was the lone defender.
Even so, I noticed that he'd put up a good fight - I don't know what the AI had garrisoned the newly-taken city with, but outside were a Mogul artillery, and a marine, each with a lot of black, showing.
At the city's fall 3 or 4 NON partisans were driven
out, and these made short work of the AI units outside, before retaking the city, immediately, losing a partisan or two in the battle.
In retaking the city, I wound up with 250 gold and my choice of Amphibious Warfare, Theory of Gravity, Fundamentalism advances, plus a greatly strengthened
garrison 2 x 4 Defence replacing 1x2 Defence.
And all because I picked up "Guerilla Warfare", an advance I normally spurn...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sieve Too
|
|
New Hampshire, USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:12
|
|
Partisans are mostly useless to build. They are intended to be pillagers and Engineer/Freight killers who work behind enemy lines. Unfortunately since the AI puts rails all over the place, even good defensive terrain can't save slow Partisans from the inevitable counter attack.
Partisans do have one unique quality that is slot related. They get a huge attack bonus when up against units with 0 attack strength. Even with only 1/3 movement left, a single Partisan can easily kill an Engineer on a mountain square.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
La Fayette
|
|
albi, france
Oct 2000 time: 06:12
|
|
ST
I have read your GREAT thread about dips and spies many times (do you remember?).
I suppose your test is OK regarding the results of bribing a city.
But
what I was mentioning yesterday (replying to Lefty S) is VERY different:
it is the result of "giving" a city to the barbs, then bribing it back.
I state it again: "giving" a city to the barbs can provide Partisans long before anyone has discovered (or even started research about) Guerilla Warfare.
It is precisely the fact that one can get Partisans so soon that makes it great (instead of fighting, and losing, against Alpine troops, you will probably be fighting mostly "pregunpowder" units and, believe me, with 3 moves, no ZOC, 4 in attack and 4 in defence, they have a rough time against you).
What remains to be tested is prerequisite #2, since prerequisite #1 seems to be Industrialization
------------------
aux bords mystérieux du monde occidental
|
|
|  |
 |
|
La Fayette
|
|
albi, france
Oct 2000 time: 06:12
|
|
I SUPPOSE
and I don't feel like testing any more in the field of bribery or poisoning or sabotaging, at least not before a few weeks
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|