 |
|  |
 |
|
Jim W
|
|
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Sep 1999 time: 05:12
|
|
The other day, wandering around one of my favourite magazine stores, I found a magazine devoted entirely to cheats.
It included a section on Civ II, which was basically the commands you have to put in to get unlimited gold for yourself in any one city.
I suppose you couold call me naive, at 55, but why would you bother? The game sets up a series of parameters, and the point is to win within those parameters. If you change any of the parameters so that you nearly "have" to win, what's the point?
You can't even get a sense of acheivement about outwitting the program, because all you're doing is copying information from a magazine, you haven't worked out anything for yourself.
I have just a vague sense trhat it has much to do with the culture of today, "Success at all costs."
And that leads us dangerously close to a rant.
I can see using some cheats to help you learn the game, to see what happens if I do this, without the necessity of having to play through thirty thousand games in order to make the same set of circumstances come up.
But cheat simply to win?
Gaaah!
Jim W
|
|
|  |
 |
|
KhanMan
|
|
Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:12
|
|
And the ridiculous part about this is that civ2 comes with a built in cheat-menu: if you want to cheat, use that!
So what's the fuss about people cheating on their own games? I mean, if someone cheats on a simple player game (not MP!), who does it affect, besides them? I agree cheating can be childish, but why cry over someone else's childishness, if it doesn't affect you?
-KhanMan of Sayen
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jim W
|
|
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Sep 1999 time: 05:12
|
|
quote:

Originally posted by KhanMan on 06-17-2000 12:46 AM
So what's the fuss about people cheating on their own games? I mean, if someone cheats on a simple player game (not MP!), who does it affect, besides them? I agree cheating can be childish, but why cry over someone else's childishness, if it doesn't affect you?
-KhanMan of Sayen
 |
Well, I don't play MP, only SP. And sure, you can say that if someone cheats on SP, they aren't hurting anyone, and I don't think there's any way to stop them.
But it seems to me to be symptomatic of something a little larger. If someone cheats to get their way in a computer game that doesn't matter a d**n to anyone, are they likely to cheat in matters that are more important to them? And for 'cheat' you can read 'steal,' 'swindle,' 'lie,' or various other verbs.
Jim W
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
I think people cheat when they aren't very good, and trying to see what it is like to win or something. I'm not sure why. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
The Mad Monk
|
 |
of Ice Cream
Mar 2000 time: 23:12
|
|
In those fabled days of yore, before the rise of computers, there was a device called a "deck of cards". Men would gather around tables in dingy, smoke filled rooms to play games like "Poker" with the "deck of cards".
When there was no one else to play "Poker" with, men would play a game called "Solitaire". Ocasionally, one would cheat at "Solitaire".
Hence the epithet, "That guy would cheat at Solitaire!"
This was considered a sign of bad character, and good folk would not play "Poker" with such a man.
Of course, we live in more enlightened times now...

------------------
The Mad Monk
"The capacity of a grass leaf to grow from the sheath
at its base is a useful adaptation to herbivore grazing.
It has also resulted, over the eons, in the piteous
spectacle of thousands of hominids vibrating behind
their lawnmowers from spring to fall."
-Someone's AP Biology Textbook
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|