 |
|  |
 |
|
lockstep
|
 |
Vienna, Austria
Aug 2001 time: 06:15
|
|
I found some interesting news at civfanatics.com, posted yesterday: Dan Magaha, Firaxis talks about playing a Civ3 game with a pacifist strategy. The link to the original thread is http://forums.civfanatics.com/Forum5/HTML/000343.html:
I can personally attest to the ability to play peacefully and have a great game of Civ III. Right now I'm the Germans, smack-dab in the middle of the French, Americans, English, Iroquois, Zulus, and Russians, and I've not had a single incidence of combat (it's ~1800's in my game).
By pouring all my resources into culture and by trading the resources I'm amassing, I've been able to make huge profits, expand my territory, and keep diplomatic relations good between myself and the other civs, and all without keeping a large army (2-3 strong defenders per city, a few roving offensive units to act as deterrents, and a couple of naval vessels for the same reason)
There has been a lot of talk about how unbalanced the special units might make the game and how the golden ages will destroy the Civ experience, but I'm not seeing it; the Zulus started out very aggressively, sending their Impis everywhere (and getting their golden age early), but I've pushed their borders back with a cultural strategy (several of their cities have defected to me due to culture) and they now have to beg me for resources (which I naturally won't give them).
So, will Civ III force you to think differently about the way you play Civilization? I really think so. Will it be a good change? So far for me, I'd say "absolutely."
Iīd say the days of warmonger dominance will be over soon.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Colonel Kraken
|
 |
Grand Rapids, MI
Nov 2000 time: 00:15
|
|
By the way, thanks for the great post, lockstep. This is most encouraging. I like to see that war is not the only fun/viable means to victory and domination.
Don't get me wrong, I love to wage war in Civ, but I don't like to persue it indefinitely as my only way to enjoy the game. I enjoy seeing how well I can conduct diplomacy. I try to roleplay; I don't play the game just to win, but to have fun and enjoy the experience.
I like to think of a role I want to play for the game and follow through (e.g. Benevolent Superpower). It makes the game more interesting and seemingly more realistic. Putting a little imagination into it (like you do a book) really helps increase the experience. I really like thinking of the computer players having personalities, holding grudges, remembering favors, etc. This isn't entirely true, of course, but thinking of the game in those terms really adds to the experience.
With all I've heard so far about Civ 3, I'm really looking forward to it. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Colonel Kraken
|
 |
Grand Rapids, MI
Nov 2000 time: 00:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ralf
I agree, but (and this is the beauty of it) since you havent battle-hardened your troops, your stuck with mostly green newbie-units, and without any Great Leaders. Also, you probably wont get a chance to build any war-related small Wonders either, since those Wonders is available as a result of how you play the game (perhaps the automatic unit-upgrade Wonder is only available for battle-experienced warmongers, for example. I dont know). |
Ah, but you're missing one small detail. No one ever said that those who play peacefully through diplomacy don't ever go to war. On the contrary, I play with this philosopy: Leave me alone and I'll leave you alone. Attack me, and you'll wish you were never a bunch of nomads calling yourself a Civ. 
Since when does the AI not attack you? Exactly. Therefore, I'll have plenty of veteran troops, war wonders, etc. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Edward
|
|
Dan Magaha's game scares me. Does he say what level he was playing on? It seems his "cultural strategy" is allowing him to easily appease his AI neighbors and keep the war mongers in the dark ages. A peaceful strategy is now obviously possible, but is it too easy? Please tell me he's playing on Warlord and hasn't mastered the game before it's even released!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dan Magaha FIRAXIS
|
 |
The Metropolis known as Hunt Valley
Mar 2000 time: 00:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Edward
Dan Magaha's game scares me. Does he say what level he was playing on? It seems his "cultural strategy" is allowing him to easily appease his AI neighbors and keep the war mongers in the dark ages. A peaceful strategy is now obviously possible, but is it too easy? Please tell me he's playing on Warlord and hasn't mastered the game before it's even released! |
I wouldn't be too worried -- as I stated later on in that thread, I'm not the world's best Civ player, I usually play on lower difficulty levels. I was playing on Warlord in that particular game, and even then it wasn't "easy" to appease my neighbors by any stretch of the imagination. It just so happened that everyone else was intent on forcibly removing the Aztecs from the face of the planet, so I took advantage of that fact and went into culture-producing mode while they were geared up for military conquest. Of course my cities were not well defended for some time and I had to pay out a *lot* of tribute to keep the AI from stomping me during that time, but it paid off in the long run.
Further, since I posted that thread, I have had to employ military tactics to get oil (how very American of me) from, oddly enough, the Americans. Abe wouldn't play ball and I needed that oil =)
Dan
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
The diplomat
|
 |
Terre Haute, IN USA
Sep 1999 time: 23:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dan Magaha FIRAXIS
I wouldn't be too worried -- as I stated later on in that thread, I'm not the world's best Civ player, I usually play on lower difficulty levels. I was playing on Warlord in that particular game, and even then it wasn't "easy" to appease my neighbors by any stretch of the imagination. It just so happened that everyone else was intent on forcibly removing the Aztecs from the face of the planet, so I took advantage of that fact and went into culture-producing mode while they were geared up for military conquest. Of course my cities were not well defended for some time and I had to pay out a *lot* of tribute to keep the AI from stomping me during that time, but it paid off in the long run.
Further, since I posted that thread, I have had to employ military tactics to get oil (how very American of me) from, oddly enough, the Americans. Abe wouldn't play ball and I needed that oil =)
Dan |
Your description of your games, make civ3 sound so cool. I can't wait to play!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
tniem
|
|
Hope College
Apr 2000 time: 00:15
|
|
Dan sounds great! I love that you are making the game so that it is more open and adaptable to how we want to play and still allow us to succeed in the game. Culture, economy, and diplomacy all seem to be becoming more integral. And while you have said this in the past, until this post I wasn't sure if it would work.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
TechWins
|
 |
Arizona
Apr 2001 time: 22:15
|
|
This all sounds so great. Every way you could possibly play seems to have some sort of benefit while still having a downfall, this is awesome. Will you take the route of getting the great leaders, military small wonders, tributes, gaining resources by force, etc... or will you take the route of getting great people, capturing cities by cultural means, gaining large borders peacefully, having a lot of resource by peaceful means, etc... Of course these options in each route can combined. You could be an aggresive, cultural civ, meaning that you are expanding your culture at great lengths but if anybody decides to mess with you then that civ will be taken off the face of the map. There are so many options in the game that it leads to a plethora of different routes you can take in playing the game.
Dan have you been earning a lot of great people? Have you gained many great leaders? I'm just curious.
quote: It just so happened that everyone else was intent on forcibly removing the Aztecs from the face of the planet |
This also encourages me very much.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|