 |
|  |
 |
|
Avenoct
|
 |
NC, USA
Apr 2001 time: 00:15
|
|
That's a great question, but I believe there is no single thread debunking strategies. However, you can look at challenge-type games and infer weak strategies from them. For instance, we're getting ready to play a 'no-crawler' succession game. So, not using crawlers is a weak strategy.
Generally, people don't do much debunking around here, and generally, great strategy is one-sided for SMAC. Many of the advanced strategies have no inverse or alternative strategy. For example, Vel mentions that surrounding your continent with sea-bases is a good method of defense, and it is. Not surrounding your continent isn't really a strategy, it's just a lack of employing the surround strategy. In a sense, the best overall game strategy is employing as many of the advanced strategies as possible, in context. So the worst strategy would be not having any plan at all. I've never seen a thread debating the possibility of benefitting from a strategy...more often we debate how much benefit can be derived, and in how many contexts.
-Smack
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Earwicker
|
 |
Washington, DC, USA
Mar 1999 time: 00:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by fluffy
Sounds like the fastest beeline to being planetbustered! 
Even AI factions can't resist such juicy targets, so a prudent stategy is to never put more than 1 SP per base. |
Prudent, yes, but one which denies the incredible benefits of stacking these SP's. Asteroid strikes are more my fear. So most bases won't haev more than one. The ME/ SC/ ToE base is the exception. Accordingly, when playing the AI, there are corrolary strategies to counteract the threat of PB's:
1. Keep the AI (especially aggressives like Yang and Lal) from discovering OSF. Sometimes difficult, true, but well worth it. Assassinate prominent researchers if you must. Avoid researching OSF until you have the HSA (or have loads of probes around to keep the AI's dirty mitts off of it). Because of theft and silly trades, I usually won't even give it top submissives until I have defense.
2. Continually sabotage PB production in the bases of said aggressives. Fusion foil or cruiser probes are ideal for this purpose.
3. Destroy those PB's that are manufactured before they can be used. Make conventional pre-emptive strikes against bases containing PB's. [Warning: extrapolation ahead. Proceed at your own risk.] In combatting the age-old AI tactic of piling 25 conventional missiles in one base, I have found that an effective countermeasure is to damage them with artillery or naval bombardment. Despite plentiful targets (including the attacking ship), the AI would not launch the slightly damaged conventional missiles. They will keep them in the base to heal before use. This might also apply to PB's, but I'd hate to let them get close enough to try it. An 80% damaged PB can still ruin my day.
These approaches can help you buy some time until ODP's are in the sky. Good luck and happy hunting.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|