02-04-2001 13:43									#1
	Artillery vs armor Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

No doubt about it, the howitzer (and stealth fighter) are my favorite city capturing units, when I have the corresponding techs. But what to do when you have techs "Mobile warfare" = armors and "Machine tools" = artillery? These two are that time the best attacking ground units. So, what should one build if he heads for world domination? My two cents here are: build artilleries!

Why artilleries? Why no armors, might one ask. After all, both of them have basic attack strength of 10 and armors have 3 movement points against the 1 of artillery. Further, an armor has more hitpoints (3 vs 2) and much better defence (5 vs 1) as well. IMHO, the difference is in artillery's fire power which is 2 opposed to 1 of the armor's. Besides, artillery is much cheaper: 50 shield vs 80 of armor's. So the artillery is very efficient taking alpine/riflemen behind city walls one at the time - you can expect very few losses if you use them. Not so if you use armors.

I do build armors in my games: they are great killing the partisans and all other off-city units or finishing off the weakened city defenders (in the rather rare case when the artillery died). Further, they can protect those weak artilleries outside enemy cities. And of course, they are good taking the counter attacks inside the newly captured city.

My point in writing this post is to find out if this is a common practise. Somehow I've got the feeling that the artillery is a bit underrated and the armors preferred by civers..

edit: corrected the fire power values
[This message has been edited by Marko Polo (edited April 02, 2001).]

	02-04-2001 18:26									#2
	Increase Your PM Length

your probably right! Armors three attacks per turn make them very effective for ground assault. I like artillery for cities with walls but usually dips take care of those. Of course anything on a mountain in a fort needs artillery as well. I find the best ground assaults are with 12 armor 4 artillery and 8 dips for the ground assault.... this is assuming no howies of course.

The biggest reason i can see for armor is the nostalgia of civ 1...... armor was by far the killer of that game and to be honest my favorite unit in civ 2 for modern warfare as well

unfortunately..... my main assault in civ is the calvalry vs phalanx

My games rarely get to modern warfare even on a large map
[This message has been edited by War4ever (edited April 02, 2001).]

	02-04-2001 20:21									#3
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

Artillery's 3 FP versus Armor's 2, and Artillery being cheaper to build sounds good in theory. But don't you find that even if your Artillery do win, that they're kind of vulnerable when your turn ends? Leaving 1d units in the field always seems to mean their demise - even if I do take the city, the Partisans will often attack anything I've left in the field. Assuming I don't leave a Bomber over the stack of attacking ground units, of course. And aside from assualting cities, I find the Armor unit to be much more flexible... so the Artillery would be a very specialized unit in my games. Do you have any stats to compare Armor and Artillery as against Riflemen/alpines/mechs behind walls?

My own experience is that pre-Howitzer, bribing cities is a lot more time and cost effective... of course I play SP and don't see a lot of AI democracies. Despite saying that, though, I find Howitzer conquest to be boring... just a question of building enough of them, railroading them up to the AI and taking out his cities four by four (one by one is too slow ). Maybe I should try a no-bribe, no howie game... if I do, I'll give the Artillery approach a try.

Do you build a preworked fortress next to the city you're attacking a put a Rifleman or other defensive unit in there, stacked with your Artillery? That would be my tactic if I had the resources to make it work.


STYOM

	02-04-2001 20:44									#4
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

I am an artillery fan. The increased firepower of a vet unit makes all the difference. I now don't try to destroy walls; artillery does the job on all but difficult defensive terrain. When I now take a city, I get the full population. If I have engineers, I will build a fortress to protect the units before and after assault.
If I have a city that needs to defend, artillery is better than armor or howitzers. After you fire, the lack of movement keeps you in the protective city or fortress.

	03-04-2001 03:46									#7
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

A unit with one movement always stays in place after a successful attack. A unit with two or more uses one point for the attack, then it will move if it was not too damaged and still has enough movement points to move into the defender's space. If it does not move, it may still have a "g" on the shield, and you may want to clear this before the end of the turn if you don't want it to move next turn. I always use the mouse pointer, not the keyboard to move. I would not think that this makes a difference. Using mouse clicks, I always leave the unit with no more movement unless I don't care if it goes astray.

	03-04-2001 04:56									#8
	Remove this text

there is no doubt that artillery is great for the cities with walls..... armors flexibility as Geofelt stated is what gives it the advantage along with its defensive capabilities.

An army of artillery is good as long as your enemy can't counter attack. If you don't take out all the cities or get a cease fire then your in trouble. I rarely take engineers with me as the ai often has RR the whole continent.

However my production is usually great at this point in the game.... with a few cities producing around 80 shields. Actually any city doing this produces armour.

Plus on the homefront side , when those pesky barbs come in waves of twenty.... its better to have tanks than artillery for the three pronged attack.

Again the beauty of civ is that each game is different.... so are the conditions...so is production..... therefore each scenario requires a different train of thought

	03-04-2001 13:16									#9
	Got spare money?

I never build them in regular civ games. Usually I'm so far ahead I just build armour. I wait until I get howies before going on the offensive. Until them armour is great for protecting your cities (killing approaching units etc.).

Artillary is great in scenarios where you are the same in tech. (nearly) as the opposing civ. And their cities have walls and they are geared for war (as in most scenarios). This really helps break the stalemate. But the require more work to protect them. And they don't work well on amphibious assaults (obviously) like in the pacific theater.

	04-04-2001 04:32									#11
	Full PM-box? Change here!

i find that the calvalry vs phalanx is the time period of easy conquest..... you don't need to coordinate..... in the modern era the ai can counterstrike effectively if you don't take enough cities....

	04-04-2001 09:15									#13
	Got spare money?

A more fair comparison would be artillery and cavalry. Or catapults versus knights. I always pick the higher attack value unit, you can work around the trnsport issues. The winner takes all nature of civ2 favors high atack units.

	05-04-2001 00:50									#15
	Full PM-box? Change here!

Inspired by GP's comment I ran a quick test attacking those 10 vet rifles in walled city with 10 vet cavalry (a8,d3,hp2,fp1) - and all of the poor guys with their horses died. I felt like a murderer sending them to a sure death..
[This message has been edited by Marko Polo (edited April 04, 2001).]

	06-04-2001 09:02									#17
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Fortified units in walled cities matter to howies and bombers, as they ignore the walls. For the other attackers, the game gives the wall bonus INSTEAD of the fortified bonus to the defenders.

Do ships that attack care about fortified status? I know both units go to one in firepower, and units in cities with coastal fortresses benefit from that. I'm not sure whether a unit's fortification status or, for that matter, whether it is in an engineer-built fortress matters to the attacking ship.

	06-04-2001 09:41									#18
	Get a bigger avatar today!

i usually build both artillery and armor, artillery to take out the tough cities and armor to shoot up any units that are blocking my way to the enemies other cities. there's almost no way i'd only build only one or the other

	06-04-2001 18:37									#20
	Got spare money?

In fact Slow Thinker was sidelined by the upgrade and has only yesterday come back on stream ...

------------------
Scouse Git[1] -- git1@scousers.net

"Staring at your screen in horror and disbelief when you open a saved game is one of the fun things of a succession game " - Hueij
"The Great Library must be built!"
"A short cut has to be challenging,
were it not so it would be 'the way'." - Paul Craven

	07-04-2001 01:06									#21
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

There's no question that when you compare the two units -- artillery and armor -- armor is preferable due to its movement of three. But there are situations (for example when I'm conquering technologically backwards civs) when I'd prefer not to have armor in exchange for the effects of Leo's workshop.

By the end-game phase, I'm conquering cities by force or bribery. If I'm taking over cities by bribery, I may find the cities to be defended by inferior units such as musketeers or perhaps even phalanx, which, however, can be upgraded into riflemen due to Leo's workshop. Armor can only be obtained by going through Automobile, which means that you have to give up Leo to get it.

In other words, when I have a big tech lead, I'll conquer the world through bribery or by force using cavalry and artillery and hold off on armor.

	09-04-2001 14:45									#25
	Get a bigger avatar today!

SG(1)
I have good news.
Slow Thinker was in fact busy sending smileys to a friend in Slovenia

	10-04-2001 03:48									#26
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

La Fayette,
I bumped "Info: diplomats and spies" thread for you and I see you are taking a rest here...

	11-04-2001 00:10									#28
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

Ok. Bon repos!

{combat system}
{walls}{fortify}
{}{end2}{SlowThinker}

------------------------------
This is a post with keywords. See a thread The Great Library: a hierarchical structure" thread.
[This message has been edited by SlowThinker (edited April 15, 2001).]

	15-04-2001 02:37									#29
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

Artillery has more firepower but and in a siege artillery is better for breaking defense, armor does pretty well too, I choose artillery for sieging and armor for all-around.

------------------
Check out Arcade Portal and
Civworld forums
Go post now!
Message from an Archangel: Do not try seek perfection for perfection is the most imperfect thing that ever existed.