 |
|  |
 |
|
East Street Trader
|
 |
London, United Kingdom
Jun 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
I did a (very short) test.
Green horse versus green phallanx on flatland. Six sneak attacks and six attacks when already at war.
The outcome for the sneak attacks was 3 horse victories, two victors near dead and one into the yellow, 3 phallanx victories, two victors near dead and the third into the red.
The outcome of the honourable attacks was 2 horse victories, one left in the green, the other into the yellow, four phallanx victories, one near dead, two hardly scratched and one into the yellow.
While clearly far from conclusive, the fact that the sneak attack battles were by far the bloodier seems to me to support the notion that there is indeed an attack bonus for a sneak attack.
And, as these were equal battles, the fact that the defender has benefit of the draw ought to produce a decent margin for the defending phallanxes. Not so in the (admitedly tiny number) of sneak attack cases.
Anyway, I will continue to work on the basis that there is a sneak attack bonus. As it happens I love to sneak attack the A1 anyway so this is no hardship. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
East Street Trader
|
 |
London, United Kingdom
Jun 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Marquis
Well, I usually prefer play to testing and only did my short test because I had posted a couple of times as though the sneak attack bonus was an established fact but then realised it was, as far as I then knew anyway, speculative.
But your offer is generous and out of respect for the excellent work you have done on the subject of combat I will keep my lab open and let you know what I find. Do you need anything more than the brief info in my short test? I wonder, for example, whether there is some way of arriving at the number of hit points left to the victor? All I did in the brief test was to record the colour(green/yellow/red) with a comment if the victor was hardly scratched or nearly dead.
If time and patience holds up I'll try breaking a truce as well as breaking a full peace treaty to see if the bonus applies to both or not.
CYBERAmazon
Don't get too carried away with this. I'm pretty well certain that the bonus is enjoyed just by the unit whose attack breaks the peace, not by all the units which subsequently also attack during the turn concerned.
That is not to say, however, that there aren't occasions when you can get multiple opportunities. If you attack and are successful the A1 will often sue for peace. So accept and then, in the same turn, immediately attack again. This is another sneak attack attracting the bonus. In my experience the A1 doesn't learn any lessons from this and will soon be suing for peace yet again. It does so particularly often after losing a city.
What you can also do is to ensure that you get the sneak attack bonus for the battle that needs it most. Usually that will be a first attack against a city. The city puts up its best defender and the benefit of the sneak attack may be to give you an otherwise unlikely win or, possibly more important, will allow a kami kaze unit that is bound to fail nevertheless to inflict far more damage than it otherwise would so that your next attack against that strong unit will win.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
SlowThinker
|
|
homeless, Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2000 time: 06:12
|
|
East Street Trader,
set hit points to 100 (10 in the rules.txt) for testing purposes. It will lower the fortuity.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
East Street Trader
|
 |
London, United Kingdom
Jun 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
I saw that "vendetta" in the cheat menu while setting up the conditions for sneak attack testing. Can you affect that setting otherwise than in cheat mode do you know?
I rather like the notion of having one or two inveterate enemies among the A1 civs. The Sioux and the Americans, the French and the English, Russia and the Americans, Persians and Greeks might all be candidates.
I have not seen a badger die but I did watch them (from hides, at night)once or twice in Epping Forest with a friend from 6th form days who was something of a naturalist. They are an endearing sort of animal and, by repute, very brave and tough. Sadly we used to have a "sport" here called badger baiting (it's been unlawful for a long time) which involved setting dogs onto them. Like much of our wildlife, they are much rarer than they were, here, and have a degree of legal protection. They are stubborn and like to travel along familiar paths. The mere fact that some idiot builds a motorway across that path does not deter them. So, nowadays, when motorways are built, if it cuts across a badger path a tunnel is constructed along the path's route so that the badger can still go its accustomed way without getting squashed.
We live in a truly strange world.
Anyway, hope your mighty confrontation went well. All despatches from the front line would be sure of avid readership.
[This message has been edited by East Street Trader (edited April 25, 2001).]
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|