 |
|
Kaak
|
|
I suggested it in the beginning. It would be a 100% cheating deturrent. did they include it?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
i guess capability is more the word i was looking for. I just wanted to know if you could watch a replay of the entire game at the end.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
saracen: obviously, with a replay, people can't use programs like cheat-o-matic or whatever else to interject units or gold. I just hope it is detailed enough to show starting techs, advances, etc...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
the problem with that statement is "....at this point..."
Where do we find problem in this? well, the game will be released in a month. the point, at which we find ourselves, is probably out of luck, just like with MP
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mongoloid Cow
|
|
Firaxis hasn't actually confirmed or denied that Multi-Player is in Civ3. Everyone has just assumed it is not in the release of the game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
RedWhiteArcher
|
|
I still can't see what does replay function has ANYTHING to do with cheating. Its doesn't even have ANY effect on the game course and you can watch it only after the game is finnished so it wouldn't effect the hall of fame.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
RedWhiteArcher
|
|
The replay function doesn't show you every single turn. It shows a big map, control areas and an event. It shows when a new city has being founded, captured, invetions or first unit of a type built. Well that how it was in Civ, I don't remember how was it in AC (but the control areas where there).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
Executor: if someone tried that, and the replay option showed the amount of gold they had, etc, you would be able to tell if they rush built the wonder. It would just be easier to pick aprt the cheaters from the non. But, for this to work, it would have to be a quite complete and interactive replay feature. I hope they did it...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
RedWhiteArcher
|
|
What do you care if someone cheated. If he cheated its his problem, he is a cheater.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SerapisIV
|
 |
Hartford, CT, USA
Feb 2001 time: 00:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by TechWins
Since I've only played Civ2 and SMAC I don't know what the replay wasl like in Civ. Is Civ's replay better than SMAC's or vice versa? |
I liked Civ1's replay better because (and this is all off of childhood memory) it showed much more info, in a little header bar at the top declaring in what year the first airplane was built or the first phalanx or when wonders were built, also, unlike SMAC, you could control the pace of the replay, so it didn't whiz by like the SMAC one does. It meant you clicked a lot, but I like the control of seeing each conquest, slowly, and at my leisure.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
RedWhiteArcher
|
|
I never played Civ2 on MP so I don't know how you can cheat, therefore I can't comment any further on this.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
*sigh* One more feature we will probably have to do without =(
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
It wouldn't be too big, and like you said, large hardrives are standard. Plus, it could name the file the same for every game played, so unless you resaved it as something else, it would just overwrite the previous...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stromprophet
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kaak
I suggested it in the beginning. It would be a 100% cheating deturrent. did they include it? |
Yeah. It is in. But deter, I think save games deter more. But you could also monitor growth with this, and you would see how qucikly they were getting huts.
Hehe, from an old friend kaak.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|