 |
|
Stromprophet
|
|
I'm going with Romans, Japanese, Zulus, French(I'm thinking Charlemign is going to be their start point), Russians, Germans, English, Aztecs, Iriquois, Americans
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tarquinius
|
|
quote: have a feeling the civs of the week are based on CSU |
I don't think that is correct; the Chinese CSU is a knight, and it came before the persian CSU which was a Swordsman, and the Romans, with a swordsman CSU too, still have to come. That wouldn't make sense.
I think it comes with the rise of a civ, my order:
Romans
Germans
Japanese
Iroquois
French
Russians
English
Aztecs
Americans
Zulus
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stromprophet
|
|
I'm just curious as to why everyone keeps putting the Aztecs closer. They didn't even exist until the 1300's or somethin.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stromprophet
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tarquinius
I don't think that is correct; the Chinese CSU is a knight, and it came before the persian CSU which was a Swordsman, and the Romans, with a swordsman CSU too, still have to come. That wouldn't make sense.
I think it comes with the rise of a civ, my order:
Romans
Germans
Japanese
Iroquois
French
Russians
English
Aztecs
Americans
Zulus |
Define Rise of Civ.
The Germans you are talking about? Huns?
They're Slavic, which is inherently Russian. Russians.
I can't recall the Iriquoius being that Ancient though. Is there any record of that?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ubik
|
|
Greece
Jun 2001 time: 05:15
|
|
The Huns slavic????? give me a break!
Huns: Gathering of tribes started their actions in the late 4th-early 5th century AD, became widely known under their leader Attila. Called "Bipedes Besties" (beasts on two legs) by Latin scholars for their ferocity and rugh manners. Currently, anthropologists tend to believe their origin were the steppes in the east of lake Baikal, but more accurate data presents them as an mongol kin group.
Maybe they had something to do with the early "skythes" too - and, to understand what that means, the Byzantines called the Mongolic tribes (Kutrigurs, early Bulgarian, Hazars etc.) also "Skythes".
And to the "Russian before or after Germany and France..." hmm... well, the first mentioning of the "Russ" in the byzantine literature should be around the 7th century AD. That should put them past the germanic tribes (Alemans, Saxons, Franks) so it should be more accurate to say that Germany and France (they and also part of the English derive from the abovementioned three tribes - Alemans=Germans, Saxons=English, Franks=France - yes, yes, it is much more complicated but it should give you an idea) should be prior to Russia. At least the Franks (legitimate kingdom since the 4th century AD) if not the Germans too.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|