 |
|
Pembleton
|
|
Cyberspace
Apr 1999 time: 23:15
|
|
Or maybe he was mischievously making it continuously confusing by giving an ambiguous answer.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sabre2th
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Xmudder
Are Goodie Huts and Barbarian Encampments the same thing?
|
No. Goody huts should function in the same way. Barbarian encampments act more like small cities or fortifications.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Christantine The Great
|
|
Massachusetts
Jun 2000 time: 00:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Blake
This is slightly on-topic, will there be an option to turn off goody huts/barbie camps? I quite like the additional challenge of playing without the bonuses from huts... and I've got a friend which swears huts/ruins/pods are unbalanced in MP. |
If you turn them off then you'll just have to turn off the Civ attributes, too. Expansionist civs would be robbed, so to speak.
They don't ruin gameplay, they add to it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Crouchback
|
|
If I had a penny for all the times that first hut would sprout a barbarian horde to eat my defenceless city, why I'd be able to buy out Bill Gates. Thing is that sort of outcome forces cheating on the usually honest player, and once you've started...
I liked the SMAC compromise, but not having goodie huts at all would've been better.
David.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|