 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
dainbramaged13
|
|
Dumbass
Mar 2000 time: 00:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by korn469
dainbramaged13
have you ever seen the EC3 list? i think we should do something like that, it's in the ideas forum check it out there
|
yeah i did read over it once, but wed never have time to do something like that! that took a long time. We expect the expansion pack to come out in 6 months, and if they are not already working on it, they will start when civ3 hits stores
quote:
but i DO NOT think that you should start the first poll now
we need time to play the game, to see what features are in the game, what features didn't make the cut, what works, and what needs improvement
so i suggest that we wait till at the very least two weeks after civ3 actually hits retail
|
one of the reasons the EC3 list affected civ3 so much is because it came out so early and had time to circle the firaxis office and actually be considered. again, think about the time constraints.
quote:
i am all for making new suggestions, but i think that we are blind right now to what areas need improvement, and we won't get an idea until we have actually played the game some |
i agree, but we should at least start the poll when the game comes out.
quote: I'd like a WWII senario, complete with a bunch of new and different 3D rendered units. |
scens = 12 shipped with game = i expect ww2 is one of them. i guess specialized 3-d units would be nice, but hey, it'd take a lot of time, and for most people, its fine the way it is.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
korn469
|
 |
Poetic Justic
Apr 1999 time: 00:15
|
|
quote: An expansion pack is not an upgrade. It doesn't ad new features, but rather, it adds simple things like new units, different senarios, etc, so I don't think it's too soon. I don't think it ever is. |
i think just the opposite of you Jason, i will not buy a civ3 expansion if it is only new scenarios...for me there has to be something new in the expansion before i will spend my money on it, i thought Alien Crossfire was a good expansion (which didn't include any scenarios), and i hope the Civ3 expansion goes that route
quote: yeah i did read over it once, but wed never have time to do something like that! that took a long time. We expect the expansion pack to come out in 6 months, and if they are not already working on it, they will start when civ3 hits stores
|
quote: one of the reasons the EC3 list affected civ3 so much is because it came out so early and had time to circle the firaxis office and actually be considered. again, think about the time constraints. |
actually the EC3 list didn't get to firaxis until Brian had left and civ was almost a year into development, but you are right about getting any expansion wishlist to them in time for firaxis to actually act on it
though i think that we could organize and and conduct an EC3X list in a month and a half at tops, 3-4 weeks to collect and refine ideas, and 2-3 weeks to vote on them and to organize them into a list
though if you do intend to launch an EC3X list as soon as the game comes out you need to start planning it now...i will offer any assistance that i can
here is a link
The Essential Civ 3 Guidelines
i think that it could done similarly to that, except get rid of fixes and new ideas and just have one thread in which people post their ideas in...get rid of seconding and just have an idea nomination and discussion phase and a voting phase...all of this can be done and sent to firaxis in less than two months after the game comes out...however you do also want to remember that some places won't get civ3 till maybe a month or two after it comes out in the US, so these people while they will have the chance to participate will be slightly disadvantaged
also you want people to combine similar ideas as soon as possible, otherwise problems will arise, trust me i speak from experiance
in the end we sent all of the ideas and the number of votes they got to firaxis but we did prominantly point out the top ten ideas
|
|
|  |
 |
|
korn469
|
 |
Poetic Justic
Apr 1999 time: 00:15
|
|
dainbramaged13
a few other points
i still believe that we shouldn't start any official expansion pack wish list until at least two weeks after civ3 comes out and here is why
*most people will take a few days to actually get the game
*during the first few weeks there will be forum overload with such thing as "i finally got civ3!," "civ3 is awsome!," "how do u do...," "what's your civ3 strategy so far?" this will distract from any expansion pack idea list
*rushing the list through will hurt the quality of the list
*most people will need to play at least a few games before they can get a feel for civ3
*some people might suggest ideas that are already present in the game
*firaxis most likely will not start on the expansion pack as soon as civ3 ships, they will probably rest some, do some bug fixes, then look at the sells number then if infogrames gives them the go ahead then they will start on the expansion
but if we start we list around the middle of november we can still have a new wishlist to firaxis by the first of the year, and this list will still be early enough to have an impact on the expansion pack...like we found out in the EC3 list, our ideas probably won't make it into the game exctly as we wrote them down, but they have seemed to make it in many cases
also on the technical end
*each person can suggest two ideas for the list
*voting will only start after the nomination and discussion period is over
*i suggest that in the voting stage each person gets a total of 20 votes, they can split their votes anyway they choose except that they cannot give any single idea more than five votes, and they must in exact numbers (1.5, 0.2, 4.8 etc is not allowed!); note a person could use less than 20 votes if they wanted but nothing more than 20
*also each person gets one negative vote, so if their is an idea they dislike they can cast a -1 for that idea in addition to the 20 votes they cast for ideas they liked
*ideas should be less than 100 words ideally, and nothing over 300 words should be accepted
*all attempts should be made to combine similar ideas
how does that sound?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
dainbramaged13
|
|
Dumbass
Mar 2000 time: 00:15
|
|
ok korn, everything, agreed. I will start the thread whenever the 'i got civ3!' threads start to dies down, and people start to come to the forums for real, between a week-2 weeks after release. I will probly take all of your rules, maybe add a few, changea a couple, but thanks for the suggestions!
cassembler, i plan on actually having not so many point alloctable either 5 or 10 so each option you vote for actualyl MEANS something to you instead of having one or two that you care about and then 20 others that mean ****. That was one of the problems with Locutus' poll.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
korn469
|
 |
Poetic Justic
Apr 1999 time: 00:15
|
|
cassembler
the reason their should only be one negative point is because if any of the ideas get in the game then it is a victory for the fans, however there have been a few of the ideas that have been real lightning rods, with some people loving those ideas more than anything, and others absolutely hating them, so it would be nice to have an opertunity to show a thumbs down for an idea without sparking a war that would lead to hurt feelings, plus the one persons disapproval shouldn't be able to cancle out an idea
dainbramaged13
i will help you in this as much as i can, no one person can do this alone, remember this about about building community and generating lively discussion about each idea presented...if the idea doesn't change any from when it gets presented then something has went wrong in the process
also about the numbers of votes each person can allocate, you need to realize that their is a problem with having too few votes, the problem is this
lets say i absolutely love one idea, think two others are great and then i like four other ideas, if i only had five or ten points it would be hard to represent that i liked one idea better than the others but still think that they should get in
in my opinion 10 votes is the fewest possible that could give a person the flexability to represent their feelings, and then it is probably too low, 15 or 20 are better, 25 being the highest number i would consider, though i do agree that 160 points is too many
a few other things you should be aware of
*first you need to let people know that you are doing this
*state all rules up front and make them as clear as possible
*all dates should also be stated when you begin
*try to stick to the schedule unless something unexpected comes up
*be fair and impartial at all times
*encourage discussion at all times
*expect for things to go wrong
*if you must change rules do it openly and inform people about it
that is about all of the advice i can give
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|