 |
|
Anun Ik Oba
|
 |
Grace of God
Sep 1999 time: 00:15
|
|
hehe. Firaxogrames had stated before that there weren't supposed to be ANY reviews of the game before the 22nd. This punk decided to do one anyhow. Maybe that explains it.
http://apolyton.net/forums/showthre...&threadid=29355
Link to previous discussion on this topic. This is the one you are talking about, right?
Last edited by Anun Ik Oba on 16-10-2001 at 08:52
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Stuie

|
 |
Have a beer!
Sep 2001 time: 00:15
|
|
You didn't get this from me, understand?
quote: I played my first actual game of Civ III last night, though I wasn't able to print out the 250 page manual, so I don't have a great grasp on all the rules yet. Got my butt kicked on the lowest difficulty level .
The addition of things like borders, cultural spheres of influence, the revamped combat, the radically different way you support troops and handle trade, etc.--all of these things put some very real twists on how you play the game. If you are a Civ/Civ II vet you'll be able to jump in and play, but chances are, not too well at first without some trial and error.
The interface, graphics, and overall look is so superior to earlier Civs that even if they had done very little tweaking this would still be worthwhile to pick up. As it stands, it seems like a very logical evolution of the series. It is far from being just Civ II with better looks IMO.
It's not revolutionary. It's not supposed to be. It's Civ. Bigger, better, better looking, but Civ. And from my experience, so far, it nails that pretty damn well. |
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|