 |
|  |
 |
|
Kautilya
|
|
St Louis, MO
Feb 2000 time: 23:15
|
|
How many of you are planning to buy the LE?
I still haven't made up my mind. On the one hand the 15 buck difference isn't that much. OTOH there isn't that much in the LE. If there had been even a half-decent strategy guide or an extra scenario I would probably have brought it.
The tech tree pullout will be useful but I feel that Firaxis is cheating us by including something that was available in the regular version earlier, only in the limited edition this time.
Does anyone know what the designer notes include? If it's interesting I might consider buying the LE.
The tin box is neat but it's worth extra money only if I really like Civ 3 and keep it as a memento and I can't know that until I buy and play the game.
Finally wouldn't it have been a great idea to release the LE. one or two weeks early? That would have been a great way of getting extra dollars from the hardcore fans. I am guessing most of us would have bought the LE by now if it had been released early.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kautilya
|
|
St Louis, MO
Feb 2000 time: 23:15
|
|
Yes it is annoying but it also makes the LE more valuable in comparison to the regular edition. A tech poster is worth at least 5 bucks to me.
It would be ironic though if , by pissing us off, this strategy makes less people buy the LE than otherwise.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Elucidus
|
|
quote: That would be like McDonalds charging you extra for pickles on their cheeseburgers. |
Yeah well, some of them now charge for cups of water, ketchup packets, and other things we used to get for free. I guess they figure if you really want it you will pay for it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sabre2th
|
|
quote: Is the Limited Edition worth buying? |
Of course! Where else will I put my biscuits?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JamesJKirk
|
 |
Dixon, CA USA
Jan 1970 time: 21:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Bkeela
It would only be worth buying if you planned to keep it un-opened and in pristine condition with the hope of selling it 20 years later on E-Bay or some equivalent for an excellent profit.
Bkeela. |
Except how many people will consider such outdated technology as compact discs as anything more than obsolete in 20 years?
Do you think a disc copy of Empire (very old game, 1978, I think, which Civ largely draws from) would be worth anything?
Also, if something's hyped up to be a collecters item, and sold to many people, then it can't be, look at Original Star Wars merchandise compared to Episode I merchandise.
However, I would like to take a gander at the designer's notes, that was the best part of the CivI manual.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kautilya
|
|
St Louis, MO
Feb 2000 time: 23:15
|
|
Well I don't think people will buy it to play the game but as an antique item. If the game becomes a real classic you might have popular-culture museums demanding it for instance. I don't think it will be worth much in 20 years but in 50 years when most copies will be lost or damaged , a Civ 3 tin box with all the goodies in pristine condition might be worth something. It's still probably a long shot even then.
BTW could you describe the designer notes in Civ1. How is it different from the "making of Civ" material?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Templar
|
 |
People's Republic of the East Village
Oct 2001 time: 00:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sabre2th
Of course! Where else will I put my biscuits? |
Oh, the response to that is too obvious . . .
And what the hell is it with 'biscuits' around here? I imagine a pack of fatties hanging around the computer.
quote: For me, having a Civ 3 tin will be kewl, and ill have a ready supply of food right next to me, for playing Civ 3 non-stop |
The word is spelt 'cool', not 'kewl', Burns. Jesus Christ, now I know how Pembleton feels about proper paragraphs. Spelling cool 'kewl' doesn't make you cool. It makes you either illiterate or a dork, I can't grok which.
As for the limited edition, f*ck the tin, f*ck the fold out tech tree, and f*ck the marketing a$$h0les who came up with the idea. Even Activision didn't manage to f*ck up putting a decent tech tree in the box with CTP.
Last edited by The Templar on 27-10-2001 at 13:37
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Hophead
|
 |
Seabrook, TX, USA
Oct 2001 time: 23:15
|
|
I originally pre-ordered the regular version. The tech tree sounds cool, but I looked at the SMAC map or whatever it was once, suspect I will look at the tech tree as often. The videos don't interest me at all, but the tin looks real nice.
That said, the more I thought about, the more I thought I would regret not getting the LE. After all, I have only been pining for this for what, a year or so. So I cancelled my original order and pre-ordered LE.
Just wish ordering the LE got me the game sooner. I also hope there might be a surprise or two with it (scenarios, more civs!)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Deathray
|
|
High Wycombe
Oct 2001 time: 05:15
|
|
Well, original box set of some old classics from only 10 years ago sell for about £20 on ebay, but mainly I'm going to get this because, as some people have pointed out before, buying Civ 3 is something of a special event (sounds sad doesn't it), and the Limited Edition just adds to it. I think they should be giving us a little more in it, like a free copy of SMAC or something, but there you go.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
albiedamned
|
|
Ellicott City, MD
Sep 2001 time: 00:15
|
|
A printed tech tree was important in the previous Civs (and especially SMAC, where you had no idea what those techs were!). But Civ3 will allow you to view the tech tree on screen for the first time. So I don't think the printed tech tree is very important anymore.
As for me, I'll buy the regular edition on Tuesday. Unless of course it is sold out by the time I get to the store, in which case I'll buy the LE. Whatever I can get my hands on first.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Akillias
|
|
there is extra scenarios in the LE??
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|