 |
|  |
 |
|
Jaundice
|
 |
Earth
Nov 2001 time: 00:16
|
|
As most people do, I myself have many complaints about the game. All I can say is...I can't wait for the patch. This could end up being a really good game.
Anyway, I've played the game a few times from beginning to end and I have to say that all things aside, it is enjoyable. And although the AI is a bit one sided in it's dealings, what country in the real world isn't? At least in this version, they seem to hold up their end of a war agreement. I was playing as the Romans, when an Egyptian boat, loaded with a settler, showed up on my shore and proceeded to set up a city just outside of my borders in an artic area. Knowing that oil was bound to show up there later in the game, I couldn't allow this. I knew Egypt had far too many cities for me to take on alone, and they were sure to send a wave of attackers across the ocean to seek revenge, I had to distract them some way. The Greeks shared the continent with the Egyptians, so I paid them a few hundred dollars and a luxury to beat the Egyptians into submission. At the same time, I brought in a horde of legion to occupy their little invasion on my shores. After about a dozen turns, to my pleasure, the Greeks had taken 5 Egyptian cities and had kept them tied up long enough to break them...and I never saw another Egyptian land on my shore. Remember back in Civ2 when you'd pay a civ ungodly amount of cash to declare war, only to have them make peace with your enemy a few turns later? It's refreshing to see them keep up a deal like that. Especially when the Greeks seemed to be a smaller empire than the Egyptians they were attacking, and had lived in peace until my influence.
I am concerned about how 3 spearmen destroyed a tank of mine though.... -JD
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pyrodrew
|
|
quote: At least in this version, they seem to hold up their end of a war agreement. |
I agree that is nice to see. I like their hard bargaining too. And since we all know human players are the biggest threats, a smart AI should too. However, I was wondering... has anyone seen the AI kill... and I mean kill another AI completely without the help of a human player? Civ2 Ghengis Khan had no problems doing this, but given how Civ3 highly favors peaceful pacifists & defenders now... is it even possible???
Regarding the AI's hard bargaining... I would think they could ease up just a little sometimes tho. Below is Shaka Zulu's offer of what he would give me for my territory map...
Attachment: 1gold.jpg
This has been downloaded 125 time(s).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
cort
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Pyrodrew
I agree that is nice to see. I like their hard bargaining too. And since we all know human players are the biggest threats, a smart AI should too. However, I was wondering... has anyone seen the AI kill... and I mean kill another AI completely without the help of a human player? Civ2 Ghengis Khan had no problems doing this, but given how Civ3 highly favors peaceful pacifists & defenders now... is it even possible???
Regarding the AI's hard bargaining... I would think they could ease up just a little sometimes tho. Below is Shaka Zulu's offer of what he would give me for my territory map... |
I have seen the Zulu's wipe out Bablyions, but especially Greeks crash of Japan was remarkable; with the help out 5-6 other AI, no human intervention, I even tried to help Japan by giving techs, money, resources, but bloodlust civs controlled by the AI raped the poor asian fellows
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|