 |
|  |
 |
|
Victor Galis
|
 |
in exile
Jul 1999 time: 00:16
|
|
"Victor, you did just prove my point. By kicking me painfully or breaking my arm you would indeed use force, retaliate etc., thus screwing the weak pacifist "logic" or the lack of ."
-Yes, but my opposition to the war is based on the mounds upon mounds of civilian casualties, not the actual use of force. (And notice there is a big difference between preparing to break an arm than actually succeeding. I know how to do it, I don't think I could actually do it in practice ) If Bin Laden had a large obvious camp somewhere away from civilians and basically only with military targets, I would have been among the first to suggest dropping FAE on them.
"Notice that your level of violence would be similar to mine, like the use of force in Afgahnistan is similar to the one of the 9.11., except that we try to keep colat-dam as low as possible"
-Right, except I have a clear target standing in front of me, and the means to damage only you, so that colat-dam is neglible, unless I knock you into some property that gets damaged , and we all know I'm not that good
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Superpopanz
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Victor Galis
-Yes, but ... |
You are opposed to war because of civilian casualties? Äh, what galaxy did you say you come from?
(And notice there is a big difference between preparing to not to inflict civilian casualties than actually succeeding. They know how to do it, but i don't think it is always possible. Nevertheless, there are things to do wich have to be done!) If Bin Laden would pay his cell phone bill he would know we had a beef with him and take the next Air Taleeban Camel to Hague or ground zero, if i would be a millionaire i would buy Apolyton and ban all of you, if if if! So far no pacifist was ever able to stop the mad macho machine (mmm) of brutal, powerhungry dictators and cruel, fundamentalist regimes, but gun barrells and bombs were. Like it or not, but thats reality.
quote: Right, except I have a clear target standing in front of me, and the means to damage only you, so that colat-dam is neglible, unless I knock you into some property that gets damaged, and we all know I'm not that good. |
Wrong! If you try to punch me back, i will just duck and you will hit your fellow peacenik instead (actually the best colat-dam i can think of ).
quote: Originally posted by Kropotkin
Ehh what? Where the hell do you get the idea for general statements like that?. |
Internet, news and personal experiences. The far left, far right and (in the cases of Israel, Iraq and Afgahnistan) extreme islamists go hand in hand, are using the same hatred propaganda and do show openly what their real common enemy is: Capitalism, democracy, the jews and NATO. You can VERY easily find out on your own, the web is full of their sites. Btw, i did not claim all peaceniks belong to those radical groups and support their goals, but they still fight on their side.
LOL Cockney, you must be viewed as a conservative on his board, eh!? 
Last edited by Superpopanz on 19-11-2001 at 01:10
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Victor Galis
|
 |
in exile
Jul 1999 time: 00:16
|
|
"You are opposed to war because of civilian casualties? Äh, what galaxy did you say you come from?"
-What's that supposed to mean? It's a perfectly good and practical reason to be opposed to war. It tends to mean you're opposed to all wars, but that's not unlike most of the peaceniks. The difference here, is that if two countries decided to fight over some frozen scrap of land that had oil under it but no people on top, I probably wouldn't be opposed on moral grounds.
"So far no pacifist was able to stop the mad macho machine (mmm) of brutal, powerhungry dictators and cruel, fundamentalist regimes, but gun barrells and bombs were."
-Yes, but at what price?
"Like it or not, but thats reality."
-What's that got to do with it?
"Wrong! If you try to punch me back, i will just duck and you will hit your fellow peacenik instead (actually the best colat-dam i can think of )."
-But I won't punch at you from close enough so that my fist will go over you. I wouldn't be able to kick you from that close in, and ideally I'd kick not punch, because I can't do jack **** with my fists.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Superpopanz
|
|
Common Victor, what kind of "shitshat"-phrases are you throwing at me? "Perfectly good to be against war, frozen oil without people and at what price":, do you really think this is of any importance for your argument other than to prove the lack of? Your values dont hold off nobody! If you dont care to become a hostage or a slave of those who kill a few thousand or million, if you dont give a d*mn about the Hitler`s, Mao`s and Stalin´s, the Milosevic`s, Hussein`s and Bin Laden`s playing hockey with heads of their slaughtered, just because it is not nearby you, great! More power to your dreamworld! I do care, i`ve got friends who suffered from dictators and wars. While they were fighting for their very life, our diplomats were talking and talking and talking. F*ck the pacifists, they are as bad as the psychopaths whom they allow to kill and kill and kill while you can open your mouths in freedom and throw filth at those who suffer with your high moral good human blathering! This, is not funny!

Ps: Nothing personal.
Last edited by Superpopanz on 19-11-2001 at 02:11
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Superpopanz
|
|
Quite a lot, if you ask me, are FUBAR! Children who saw their parents getting slaughtered, women and girls who got raped and hundreds of thousands who lost their homes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Victor Galis
|
 |
in exile
Jul 1999 time: 00:16
|
|
"If you dont care to become a hostage or a slave of those who kill a few thousand or million, if you dont give a d*mn about the Hitler`s, Mao`s and Stalin´s, the Milosevic`s, Hussein`s and Bin Laden`s playing hockey with heads of their slaughtered, just because it is not nearby you, great!"
-To compare Bin Laden to the others is about as faulty an argument as any. I don't oppose defending oneself, but to fight destroy Afghanistan because Bin Laden is there... no. The German people became Hitler's accomplices by voting him in and continuing to support him. The Afghan people have no choice about Bin Laden, and probably very few of them even know where he is.
"I do care, i`ve got friends who suffered from dictators and wars.'
-Yeah, I spent part of my life under a communist dictator in his megalomaniacal phase. Doesn't make it right to kill people.
"Children who saw their parents getting slaughtered, women and girls who got raped and hundreds of thousands who lost their homes."
-Sounds just like the NA taking a big formerly Taliban-held town.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Bob Dornan
|
|
Qcubed: It's human nature, can't change it . BOMB AWAY
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Superpopanz
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Victor Galis
1.-To compare Bin Laden to the others is about as faulty an argument as any. I don't oppose defending oneself, but to fight destroy Afghanistan because Bin Laden is there... no. The German people became Hitler's accomplices by voting him in and continuing to support him. The Afghan people have no choice about Bin Laden, and probably very few of them even know where he is.
2.-Yeah, I spent part of my life under a communist dictator in his megalomaniacal phase. Doesn't make it right to kill people.
3.-Sounds just like the NA taking a big formerly Taliban-held town. |
1. Why? A terrorist leader, willing to sacrify thousands of innocent for his sick version of life, why is he not comparable to the other, bigger scumbags? All of them started little btw. We fight to destroy Afgahnistan? You must be pretty brainwashed to claim such utter nonsense! Afgahnistan is already destroyed, and the people did suffer heavily under the Taleeban. I dont think you have any idea what you`re talking about! The Afgahn people did care sh*t about Bin Laden, because they were busy surviving since many years. The Taleeban regime did nothing to stop the misery, infact they worsened the situation by enforcing their idiotic rules, hindering international relief efforts, harbouring terrorist organisations and banning women from daily life. Do you have any idea how a woman can feed her fatherless children if she is not allowed to work?
Do you have any idea about the refugee camps?
Hitler, btw, became big because the pacifists let him! Remember Chamberlain!
2. So did i! I even spent 13 months of it in prison. Makes it very right to kill if you ask me!
3. Äh yes, where did you say you get your news from? Radio Peking, the daily Marxist?
Edit: Every country, be it Syria, Iraq, Iran, Lybia or whatever, must learn that harbouring terrorist organisation will result in the elimination of its government!
Last edited by Superpopanz on 19-11-2001 at 03:59
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|