 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Jason
|
|
Halifax, NS, Canada
Aug 1999 time: 05:16
|
|
As I said here, the 19th century German troops weren't "uniquely" good, even if Prussia kicked some fairly serious tail in the 1860s. Other armies had trained troops of the same sort with the same or better weapons, they were pretty typical. The distinction was in higher command, organization, etc, in my view.
A 4-4-1 or 3-5-1 musket unit with a cost higher than the French musketeer and dependant on Military Tradition or maybe metallurgy would be a unique German unit. But to be truthful it's simpler just to keep the Panzer. It works! There's no need to debate the qualities of the Panzer IIIe vs the Panzer IV, it's not that specific a game. Hell, the French have musketeers. That's a tip of the hat to Dumas more than any actual history I'm aware of.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
d_dudy
|
|
hope Ecthelion sees this thread
i say rename the panzer. that's a pretty general word isn't it? don't other germanic languages use panzer as their word for tank?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Der PH
|
 |
Aachen, Germany, Old Europe, Axis of Evil
Jul 2001 time: 06:16
|
|
I won't call the 3rd Reich a german 'Golden Age', but fact is, that Nazi-Germany was an extremely powerful nation in that era, at least concerning the military.
Since the german tanks were an essential part of the Blitzkrieg tactics, I like them very much as the german UU and I also like the name 'Panzer' (whatever they do with it in the translated german version of Civ3).
The question about the german golden age is in fact very difficult. I think, the highest overall prosperity existed in past-WW2-germany since the 1950s, but since the german 'Bundeswehr' is outclassed by most armies of other industrial nations it would be hard to find a UU for that aera.
In Civ3 there is no need for a 3rd Reich. Without the Nazis I think Germany could have had a real Golden Age in the middle of the 20th century, so for an alternative history in Civ3 the choice of the panzer might not be too bad.
As mentioned before, I like it!
Last edited by Der PH on 15-11-2001 at 14:21
|
|
|  |
 |
|
IncreduloDriver
|
|
of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution
Nov 2001 time: 13:16
|
|
Does the Teutonic Knight look really short to anybody else?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rex Exitium
|
|
quote: Originally posted by SofaKing
In respect to Germanic horder that scared the living daylights out of the Roman legions, how about the Beserker? It could either be a 2/1/1 unit for 10 shields, or perhaps a 3/1/1 for 20 shields. I think 3/1/1 makes more sense in order to equate them to Roman Legions.
Also, since this would be an ancient era unit, I think it would be more useful than the panzer (earlier bonuses yield higher turn advantage).
As for unit design, a warrior with his hair on fire (a commom Berserker image) would be pretty cool. |
Technically, Berserkers aren't German, they're Germanic/Nordic peoples and they were hardly a civilization. Barbarians they were, but despite that, they had a complex religious and social system, but they had nothing compared to the complex infrastructure of the Romans or the Persians.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rex Exitium
|
|
quote: Originally posted by IncreduloDriver
Does the Teutonic Knight look really short to anybody else? |
Yes, he's a miniature model. Like those Warhammer Fantasy/40k copper/puter/clay models.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Frodo_05
|
|
Bruxelles, Belgium
Nov 2001 time: 06:16
|
|
First of all, Panzer is quite OK, since the models PzKw I through PzKw IV were all generally referred to as Panzer I through Panzer IV.
If it has to be a later model, like the Tiger (PzKW VI) or the Panther (PzKw V) I would REALLY suggest the Panther. The advantage of the German Panzer in this game is speed, and the Tiger was increadibly slow. The Panther otoh was quite maneuverable.
Still, the Russian T-34 series was generally even faster...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:16
|
|
While I'm glad my suggestion of using the Prussian infantrist as UU was adapted by a respected poster, I'm irritated it is accepted by so few people. One history person has told us the Prussian infantry of that age wasn'tthat superior, but we do know the Founder's Age is closer to a Golden Age than the 3rd Reich... and what would another trigger for the golden age be? I can't remember there are any major wonders of the world in Germany.. Bach's Cathedral maybe, and Koperinkus' observatory... are both in Civ3?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Aurel
|
|
Bavaria
Nov 2001 time: 05:16
|
|
just another idea: what about the V2 rocket used at the end of WW2. i dont know much about it but i think it was a unique technological advancement that time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Adm.Naismith
|
 |
Milano - Italy
Oct 1999 time: 06:16
|
|
I must agree that one main driver in CSU choice should be its effect about "Golden Age" timing.
OTOH, if you aren't rewriting history on a good earth map, you can consider german special unit without fear of a bad definition of "Golden Age" 
If that the case, U-Boat did a devastating campaign, both for technical merits and for superior tactics, in WWII.
I'd like to point out that the real unique (no equivalent) weapon system during WWII that only German used was the V-1 / V-2 rocket/missile (as Aurel mention above).
I put both on the table because, while I know they where quite different, I suppose we can put one or the other in Civ III as better they fit existing rules and balancing.
For not dedicated reader (I already mentioned this in an old post) I remember V-1 was the first "concept" of modern cruise (conventional warhead) missile, while V-2 project is still very close to current available balistic missile like SCUD family (widely available with some customization in IRAQ, IRAN, China, Pakistan, etc.).
Of the two, V-1 should be interceptable by fighters in air-superiority mission, while the V-2 should be stopped only with an SDI advance.
No others country had similar weapons until they get secret projects and engineers teamwork from captured German laboratories and launch sites.
If the missile units doesn't fit with the Civ III limits, and U-Boot aren't good for large landmass random map, I suggest to keep Panzer but renaming them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jason
|
|
Halifax, NS, Canada
Aug 1999 time: 05:16
|
|
I've never gotten a golden age from a late-model UU yet! You always get one before that I find. The hard part for the Germans is a scientific wonder - perhaps Newton's is best. Military wonders are easy though; two very strong wonders, Sun-Tzu's and Womens' Suffrage, trigger for militarists.
Again, I just don't see a special strength to the infantry of the 1860s Prussian forces... They were certainly all that they should be, but for 1-1 superiority in troops its' best to look to Frederick the Great I think. It's in part the Prussian legend from that time that lends lustre to all subsequent German triumphs of arms.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:16
|
|
Hey, we're also talking about halfway historical correctness here... so we should consider it might be wise to find a scientific or military wonder that was actually built in Germany 
Without that, a golden age can only be triggered by the unit, or a wodner that historically doesn't belong to Germany... I know, historic realism is not all, but it should at least be possible to come halfway close t oreality in the game, at least with the civ you're playing as... well why don't we build wonders like "Big red house with yellows spots" but use decent institutions from he past? Because of realism, so get it sorted, Firaxis.
Either a new unique unit for Germany or a scientific or military wonder that you can find in Germany in the real world... apart from that...
But then, Copernicus' Observatory might be a solution... the poles would argue the man was Polish, and yes, he's of Polish heritage, but as far as I remember, he lived under citizenship of a German state, so 
is Copernicus' Observatory in the game?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:16
|
|
And how a civ would only have one special characteristic is beyond me. The Germans are militaristic and scientific, and I'm actually asking for scientific or militaristic wonders.
And if you had ever played the game Civilization, you would know that Copernicus' Observatory is indeed a scientific wonder.
Before you treacherous person change your post, here is the relevant line:
quote: how Copernicus' Observatory would be "Militaristic" is beyong me |
I don't bear responsibility for bad orthography, BTW.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:16
|
|
some Polish polytubbies do
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|