 |
|
Dobrovolets
|
|
So I'm running XP Pro, having upgraded from W2K Pro SP2. Some jiggling with the compatibility wizard on terran.exe (setting the OS to emulate W2K) has persuaded SMAC to run, but SMACX keeps bombing out after the "start game" dialogue with an error in smacx.icd.
Has anyone got a fix for this?
Hello to all, incidentally, from this brand new subscriber.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bruce205
|
|
Had same problem last night (I have p4 and it said CPU was not supported)
I tried this link and it worked http://techsupport.ea.com/
Hope it helps
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dobrovolets
|
|
Ah, sadly, it's not a P4 problem - the machine is SMP 2 x 500 MHz processors and ran SMACX very happily under W2K. SMAC still plays well enough, so I suspect it's something ill-behaved in smacx.icd
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:16
|
|
D, I have XP Home, and SMACX works to an extent. It crashes now and then, but I can recover.
IIRC, SMAC v 4.0 had worked out a lot of the bugs that caused crashes. These were, however, reintroduced with SMACx and not fully corrected with v2.0.
The worst crash bug had to do with the wheelmouse. Disable that, and many of your crash problems, at least in Win98, disappear.
I tried disabling the wheelmouse in XP, but did not notice any difference in SMACx crashing. What does seem to have an effect, though, is game size. This implies a resource allocation issue.
So, try eliminating all other tasks and running SMAXx with a tiny planet.
Ned
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dobrovolets
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
D, I have XP Home, and SMACX works to an extent. It crashes now and then, but I can recover.
IIRC, SMAC v 4.0 had worked out a lot of the bugs that caused crashes. These were, however, reintroduced with SMACx and not fully corrected with v2.0.
The worst crash bug had to do with the wheelmouse. Disable that, and many of your crash problems, at least in Win98, disappear.
I tried disabling the wheelmouse in XP, but did not notice any difference in SMACx crashing. What does seem to have an effect, though, is game size. This implies a resource allocation issue.
So, try eliminating all other tasks and running SMAXx with a tiny planet.
Ned |
Interesting. I don't even get as far as starting a game - but I will try the smaller planet dodge - I tend to go for huge automatically... clearly a macho thing 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Simple Girl
|
|
Hi Ned, thanks for reply!
This is strange, I never had message like this with win98,
I have performed full install, and I am not using SMAX, I play SMAC wich doesnt have protection, except for this message that unless you have full install some game features wont be available. But now under Win Xp, there is this new message, and it is really annoying , does anyone get it too?
By the way, about second message, you can get rid of it if you edit a bit jackal.txt file in game directory, find this string:
#FILEFIND_NOCD
and replace it with
;#FILEFIND_NOCD
But still first message is a mystery.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
johndmuller
|
 |
Capitol Hill, Colony of DC
Feb 2001 time: 00:16
|
|
Dobrovolets,
Is XP Pro really an upgrade from W2K? I've been wondering what the differences were supposed to be (as they both list for about the same price); XP Pro is a bit newer and one would expect that it can set up easier for home use, but I would have thought that Microsoft would hold out on at least some feature to keep the NT line a bit more powerful than the Win95 line.
Regarding your problem, I assume that you have looked for any patches, fixes, SvcPaks, etc that might address the problem. As I recall, there was a (game) compatibility patch for W2k shortly after its release; perhaps likewise XP?
Have you checked out the MS knowledge base? Sometimes searching for whatever strings, addresses, etc that are returned with the error can be surprisingly on target (remember I said sometimes).
I've been running SMAC & SMAX on NT4 for some time now with bad sound, but without major substantive difficulties. At first I had degenerative crashes as if it were losing memory over time, but turning off the screen saver (it didn't seem to matter which one I had been using) made it very solid. I don't think that problem was particularlyl related to SMAC/X (perhaps to the motherboard's driver software?), but perhaps you've got a similar problem.
If you are running the no CD hack, perhaps it is not XP friendly.
If SMAX ran under W2K, it could suggest a possible driver problem - where a newer version exposed some incompatibility with SMAX; if you've got time on your hands, you could try to "retro" some of the drivers (like the video or (scrolling) mouse for example or the HD and/or CD drivers).
If you not only have time on your hands, but are also willing to risk your whole installation, you could try things like seeing if it will let you install some of the compatiblity patches or SPs for W2K.
Good Luck and Hi
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dobrovolets
|
|
quote: Originally posted by johndmuller
Dobrovolets,
Is XP Pro really an upgrade from W2K? I've been wondering what the differences were supposed to be (as they both list for about the same price); XP Pro is a bit newer and one would expect that it can set up easier for home use, but I would have thought that Microsoft would hold out on at least some feature to keep the NT line a bit more powerful than the Win95 line. |
Strictly speaking, I suppose XP Pro shouldn't be installed on a home machine - it's specifically an industrial-strength business OS. On the other hand, XP Home is a crippled XP Pro so it should be functionally identical. XP finally sees the demise of the Win 9x code (and not a day too soon) and code overlap between consumer and business OS.
quote: Regarding your problem, I assume that you have looked for any patches, fixes, SvcPaks, etc that might address the problem. As I recall, there was a (game) compatibility patch for W2k shortly after its release; perhaps likewise XP?
Have you checked out the MS knowledge base? Sometimes searching for whatever strings, addresses, etc that are returned with the error can be surprisingly on target (remember I said sometimes). |
Certainly have. There is a wizard which allows you to con an executable into thinking that it's running on Windows for Playgroups, 2K or whatever - tried this, with identical results. The issue seems specifically to be with SMACX with the latest Firaxis service pack or patch or whatever they call it. I imagine I'll end up de- and re-installing the whole thing when I get back from the forthcoming business trip.
quote: I've been running SMAC & SMAX on NT4 for some time now with bad sound, but without major substantive difficulties. At first I had degenerative crashes as if it were losing memory over time, but turning off the screen saver (it didn't seem to matter which one I had been using) made it very solid. I don't think that problem was particularlyl related to SMAC/X (perhaps to the motherboard's driver software?), but perhaps you've got a similar problem.
If you are running the no CD hack, perhaps it is not XP friendly.
If SMAX ran under W2K, it could suggest a possible driver problem - where a newer version exposed some incompatibility with SMAX; if you've got time on your hands, you could try to "retro" some of the drivers (like the video or (scrolling) mouse for example or the HD and/or CD drivers).
If you not only have time on your hands, but are also willing to risk your whole installation, you could try things like seeing if it will let you install some of the compatiblity patches or SPs for W2K.
Good Luck and Hi |
I'm not that wedded to the game - XP has a very stable setup for everything else I do (and it plays Civ3 like an angel) - so I think I'll resign myself to not playing SMACX for a while...
Thanks to you and everyone else for the advice!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|