 |
| |
|
|
Yolky
|
|
Ontario Canada
Oct 2001
time: 00:16
|
|
I see people with 1 ghrz computer having slow problems as well. I dont think much we can do to make the game faster.
Try turning the music off. I have read that here. Try getting more memeory is you have the money.
Personaly I think its the same creators of Diablo 2 Lord of Destruction. That game runs really slow too. It is the way the game was designed.
As someone else mentioned in anthor post, the graphics are not that complicated that we need super computers to run. They are simple enough.
I believe the computer is actually thinking (some of the time) and maybe that is why the game takes awhile between turns. Better AI = longer turns. I could be wrong.
Davor
|
|
| |
|
|
|
StarGazer
|
|
San Francisco
Jun 2001
time: 21:16
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by ElitePersian
The biggest problem here is that the AI doesnt know what to do with his military units, so he just aimlessly patrols them, and you have to see him patrol them (unless its in his territory), thats mostly why turns take so long. |
My experience indicates that it is NOT just seeing the units move around that causes the turns to be so long. Here's the skinny.
I'm using a Pentium III 550 Mhz, 256 Mb RAM, nVidia GeForce 2 Ultra 64 Mb video card, under Windows 98.
Since I created a huge world with 80 percent water and 20 percent archipelago, eight civs, for the most part each civ is on a separate island-continent. As a result, I seldom see any foreign units being moved around while I'm waiting for my turn, just one or two ships passing near my island every once in a while.
Nevertheless, the delay between turns has risen to between two and three minutes (I'm now at 1957 A.D.), which is really unacceptable -- especially since the screen is frozen, thus making it impossible for me to examine my cities, etc., while I am waiting for my turn. All I can do is sit there, waiting and waiting and waiting and .... I've never played a solo computer game in which I have had to wait such a long time for my turn, and I've been playing them for 20 years.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Elowan
|
|
Try holding down the shift key when the AI moves
|
|
| |
|
|
|
trader
|
|
New York City
Nov 2001
time: 00:16
|
|
I forgot to mention (to Logan 5) that when I turned off the animation then I don't see my units do anything - they just finish the task and wait for your orders.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Fredric Drum
|
 |
of Cheese
Dec 2000
time: 06:16
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by StarGazer
My experience indicates that it is NOT just seeing the units move around that causes the turns to be so long. Here's the skinny.
I'm using a Pentium III 550 Mhz, 256 Mb RAM, nVidia GeForce 2 Ultra 64 Mb video card, under Windows 98.
Since I created a huge world with 80 percent water and 20 percent archipelago, eight civs, for the most part each civ is on a separate island-continent. As a result, I seldom see any foreign units being moved around while I'm waiting for my turn, just one or two ships passing near my island every once in a while.
Nevertheless, the delay between turns has risen to between two and three minutes (I'm now at 1957 A.D.), which is really unacceptable -- especially since the screen is frozen, thus making it impossible for me to examine my cities, etc., while I am waiting for my turn. All I can do is sit there, waiting and waiting and waiting and .... I've never played a solo computer game in which I have had to wait such a long time for my turn, and I've been playing them for 20 years. |
The AI probably still moves his units around, even if you can't see them.
For me, speed issues occurs at huge maps only.. it must be the total number of cities and units that counts, and that number is significantly larger on huge maps. It's possible that this can be corrected if the AI can learn to fortify his units. Moving units is probably faster when you can't see them, but it still takes some time to calculate the movements.. and most of the time the AI is moving units just for the fun of it.
Fred
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Travathian
|
|
Chandler, AZ, USA
May 1999
time: 21:16
|
|
Civ3 will eat up all the ram it can get. I'd recommend going to 256mb if you can. Especially since doubling your memory will cost less than your next game.
Second, don't try doing anything else on the system wile playing Civ3. Turn off virus software or crap like Norton's systemworks and similar software. If anything, use msconfig, remove the startup folder, restart and then play Civ3.
Next, think how long your turns take, and your brain is the fastest computer around. The computer has to move every piece, plus it has a series of rules to run thru repeatedly to decide what to do. So 10-15 minutes for 7-15 computer opponents to take their turn isn't unreasonable in my book, and I'm running a 1.4 with 512mb.
I don't feel that anyones problems are video card related, it all comes down to memory, processor, and settings. Huge maps with 300+ cities and 1000+ units require time to manipulate.
Lastly, the 10-15 minutes between turns is a good reason to get your arse up from the computer and get blood flowing in your legs or read a book like I do.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Polonius
|
|
West Australia
Nov 2001
time: 14:16
|
|
How do you all feel about the speed since the patch? I haven't check it with a clock, but my game certainly seems to have speeded up since I applied it. Before the patch I turned off all the watch movement options but it didn't make the difference I was hoping for - I still had to watch a heck of a lot of little men running around the screen while I waited.
Since the patch they have either increased the options to turns stuff off or made them more effective. I still have to wait quite a lot during late game moves but the time seems more or less acceptable now. (I have an Athlon 1.2ghz and 256 meg RAM)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
darthx86
|
|
oops - double post 
Last edited by darthx86 on 21-12-2001 at 07:34
|
|
| |
|
|
|
darthx86
|
|
Here's a proposal: I'll link to my current saved game (Babylonians, regent, 5 AIs, large map - I think). On my old machine, it would take ~40 seconds before my advisor would pop up (1740AD).
I just upgraded my hardware last night, so I am anxious to see how it improves (when I get Civ 3 installed). In the mean time, let's get a benchmarking poll running. Download the save, cycle the turn, and time it with a stopwatch or use the PC's clock (whatever). Post your result and your system specs in this thread.
Format:
CPU (Make, model, and speed)
RAM (How much, what type, how fast)
Video card (make, model, RAM)
Video driver version
OS and any updates
My reference specs:
CPU = Dual Durons 1GHz (200MHz DDR bus)
RAM = 512MB Crucial, DDR, CAS 2.5, registered
Video card = Asus 6800, GeForce 256 32MB DDR
Video driver = nVidia reference 12.41
OS = Windows 2000 SP2
I'm curious to see just where the performance bottleneck is on this game.
File: http://www.geocities.com/darthx86/Civ3test.zip
EDIT: I checked and Geocities is being stupid. Right-click on the file and save, and it will download just fine. 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
battists
|
|
Good idea on the benchmark. Here's my take:
My reference specs:
CPU = 700 mhz Pentium
RAM = 256MB
Video card = ATI Rage Mobility
OS = Windows 2000 SP1
It took about 32 seconds for me.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Peace Builder
|
|
Minnesota, USA
Dec 2001
time: 23:16
|
|
I have a similar experience with several other games including a predecessor to this one. What I found then will probably apply here as well.
The larger the map, the more memory it takes. The more units, the more memory it takes. If you don't have enough physical memory it starts using virtual memory. The more virtual memory it uses the more often it has to wait for memory to load from disk.
In a predecessor to this game on a huge map I would get into the game a ways and it would crash. It always seemed to be about the same point. After increasing my RAM the game stopped crashing. The unexpected side effect was that the game speeded up imensily. I had another machine with similar specs. I ran the game there and watched the hard drive stay in use 100% of the time while the game was running. After upgrading the memory the in-use light came one briefly once in a great while. Since then I have always put large amounts of memory in my machines.
My Civ3 runs acceptably fast on a huge map with 8 civs into the modern age. With a huge map and 16 civs it ran fine also but I haven't played past the middle ages yet. As the game moves on it does take longer. But I haven't seen more than about three minutes at the worst. When I have a lot of units on the map I sometimes do hold the shift key down to speed up the animations. But most of the time I watch for any units my moving units expose. Three years ago I was playing a strategy game of this type that started out with the computer taking around a minute for it's turn and as the number of units increased it eventually reached over an hour for the computer turn. So two or three minutes does not seem like much of a wait for me.
I run with all animations on and the music off. Before I tired of the music, it didn't seem to make a difference to my speed.
I am using a stock Pavilion N5470.
CPU = Athlon 4 1Ghz
RAM = 255 MB
Video card = Trident CyberBlade XP (69)
Video driver = Version 6.50.6054-10.69
OS = Windows ME
I have used Norton Utilities to repair my system periodicaly. I also run Norton System Doctor at all times including when playing games. Tonight I discoverd that my virus scan had started. Even with it running I experienced less than 30 seconds computer turn with 8 civs on a huge map in the early part of the industrial age in 1470.
I installed the patch and speed hasn't seemed to be affected by it.
As to new cities, I have seen a delay. I think it was around 5 seconds.
I hope this helps those of you who are experiencing problems.
Have a Terrific day!
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16.
Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
17-11-2001 09:51
Oh well... perhaps the patch will give that as an option.
|