 |
| |
|
|
jack_frost
|
|
From my experiances expansionist is actually really good.
Aside from finding the best expansion spots (which is real important), and goodie huts (which give you a good boost). You also gain the ability to compete with the computer in making contact with other civs. If you do it well, you can position yourself as the most advanced tribe really early. You can also withhold contact between rival civs for sometimes a long time if your in a central spot and expand quickly.
But I really like the english due to expansionist/pottery/alphabet. Which lets you get granaries really early, and possitions you to be the first republic. The comination with this, and the above is great. PLUS you get your golden age RIGHT at the start of industrial which is one of the ideal times. Too bad you get a ship special unit - sometimes I have to start a war randomly to hit my golden age (its hard to find a boat to kill sometimes).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jack_frost
|
|
huts are better for expansionist. Increases chances of goodies and not barbarians.
I've never hit a barbarian as expansionist, its very rare that its empty, and I've gotten more then one settler in a single game as expansionist.
Show me results like that as non-expansionist on emperor (hut quality is biased by difficulty), and maybe I'd agree.
And simply, you can grab huts the computer would have gotten.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Badtz Maru
|
|
I'd say that about 2/3 of the time playing Expansionist I will get one settler from a hut. More than once I have gotten two. Even one settler in the early game can be a huge advantage, and two will make sure that you are in the lead for the rest of the game if you don't do anything stupid, especially when you consider that you will also have a tech lead from the techs you get from huts. I always play on Huge maps, though. I doubt Expansionist would be worth much on smaller ones.
The fact that you never get hostile barbarians from a hut with Expansionist doesn't really mean that much to me, as I've never got them anyway. I suspect that getting hit by barbarians early on would often lead to a reload anyway. The money you get early on from huts is very nice too. People seem to think money isn't worth much in the game, but I think they don't play around much with their domestic adviser screen. Having a nice reserve of gold gives you lots more options - not only can you hurry improvements, you can buy techs from the AI (on Regent you can often get Ancient Era techs for well under 100 gold), you can buy luxuries or strategic resources, convince hostile civilizations to leave you alone, you can go into the red for several turns to increase research or to keep from having to make entertainers to keep your people happy - getting extra money early on can make the beginning phase much easier.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
fbitt1
|
|
I almost never get tech from goodie huts with non-expansionist civs. I've built cities that included a hut in its radius with a non-expansionist civ, and out popped barbs.
On large and huge maps, Pangea, expansionist Civs get a great early start:
- Extra tech:
Can be used to get an early start on Wonders (for culture scores that increase over time.
Sold to the AI for gold
Traded for tech
- Early exposure of the map. Early contact, valuable world maps, selling contact between civs
- Extra warriors -- extra protection in frontier cities, fodder, etc.
I've found Literacy, Monarchy and Republic in huts, plus I get piles of money early.
With the right circumstances, that early lead can be maintained throughout the game. Your early, superior culture allows you to absorb cities culturally faster, block out the AI from expansion, keep them from resources, etc.
I think they are way under rated here. Allows for a larger variety of non-warmongering strategies.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
egovalor
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by jack_frost
From my experiances expansionist is actually really good.
Aside from finding the best expansion spots (which is real important), and goodie huts (which give you a good boost). You also gain the ability to compete with the computer in making contact with other civs. If you do it well, you can position yourself as the most advanced tribe really early. You can also withhold contact between rival civs for sometimes a long time if your in a central spot and expand quickly.
But I really like the english due to expansionist/pottery/alphabet. Which lets you get granaries really early, and possitions you to be the first republic. The comination with this, and the above is great. PLUS you get your golden age RIGHT at the start of industrial which is one of the ideal times. Too bad you get a ship special unit - sometimes I have to start a war randomly to hit my golden age (its hard to find a boat to kill sometimes). |
Here's a possibilty...I've found that if you stack ANY naval unit with a pirate ship (privateer), when the pirate gets attacked the other naval unit actually defends it (you still don't go to war, although I think you might suffer a reputation loss. The romans suddenly went from gracious to annoyed with me after throwing at least 20 ironclads uselessly against a "pirate greek battleship. heh.) Question: You think a "pirate" man-o-war that successful defends itself might send you into golden age? hmm. Try it sometime, I never play english.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
dexters
|
 |
Vancouver, Canada
Nov 2001
time: 05:16
|
|
Expansionsit civs as stated allows you to scout locations, and get goodie huts, which I believe gives you 100% non barbarian goodness.
I got 5 techs and 1000 gold on a large map as I simple sent my scout moving into new territories even as my Civ grew. People forget that it's not just the very beginning. If you're on a large map, you can go on for a good 100 turns exploring and finding resources.
I've used the strategy to effectively "camp" out at a resouce and deny the AI from ever using it. My scout also helped me discover potential threats early. In my current game, I found the Aztecs above me. With water cutting off expasion south, Aztecs would cut off my expansion north and I'd be stuck controlling a small peice of land. It was really the early discovery of the Aztecs that allowed me to move quickly to establish cities northward and westward and stake my claim on a larger peice of the pie.
The warrior alternative is feasable, but not optimal. It takes several turns to produce the warrior, and once it is produced it has only one movement point, compared to the scout's 2. Warriors can be effective a little later on even for expansionsit civs to protect resources found by the scout. If you're playing advanced difficulty levels on one of the larger maps, by the time your warrior finds an enemy Civ, it is usually too late, strategically, to change the course of your expansion to cut off any potential threats in the rival Civ's expansion. And even if you did try to change course, it takes an additional 5 to 10 turns to get the settlers where you want them to be, and while that is going on, the AI is expanding like map, and more than likely, moving close to you and taking sweet spots.
Nothing is worse than not being able to get your first 10 or so cities off to a good start. If you lack the territory to build them because you are getting boxed off, or the AI is taking all the good locations, you'll find yourself struggling to compete later on.
Part of the trade off in this game is that obviously you can't win every land grab,so you will certainly have to to let the AI build where you might not like it, but know you will come with an army later on and take it by force. But it is also important to keep in mind you won't be able to field that army if the AI expansion cuts you off from strategic locations, resources and the like. Thescouts give a great early warning for any player as to the appropriate strategic moves to maximize ones opportunities in the very early game. And like I said, you might find 3 iron mines up north, and you may want to rush settles up there to claim them, a discovery you might not have made untit later for a non expansion civ and you'd be stuck trading for it, or worse yet, the rival civ will send his swords man to cut down your Civ and you're finished.
Last edited by dexters on 23-11-2001 at 12:16
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MarshalN
|
|
I think the speed of when you get the techs make a difference. You can build better units/buildings earlier, you can do a lot of stuff with early tech advantage, like trading (although on a huge map you won't have as many chances to trade). Now that I see the whole map, I know that I got a lot of huts that were right around my neighbours. If I didn't use expansionist, I probably would never have gotten them.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
barefootbadass
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by vmxa1
Huts that are near you settlements can be made to give value without EXPAND trait. I send someone to the hut and if it is bad, I just reload and leave it alone. Eventually I build or expand to include it in a city and it always seems to give up good stuff. So far it has happen in every game. |
Huts near you also benefit expansionist civs, the point is that they tend to get more huts. Also, please don't use reloads for something bad happening to demonstrate that not getting bad stuff from huts as expansionist civs is not really an advantage. You can do it if you want but AFAIK your whole game is 'tainted' from that point on.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Badtz Maru
|
|
I take back what I said about Expansionist probably not being any good on smaller maps.
I recently played a Tiny map game, edited to allow 16 civilizations. I encountered all the other expansionist civs right away, and at the very beginning of the game, before I had researched my first tech, they all had 4 or 5 techs I didn't have. In this tiny little cutthroat world, the Zulus were a major player early on, and still an important factor later on in the game due to their tech lead.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Beau
|
|
Ok I always play XL maps. But it has been my experience that cpu's with the expansionist trait ALWAYS do the best. The one cpu that almost always seems to be in my games is Russia. Exp/Scient and they are always in first or second. There expansionist and science traits allows them to research faster and expand faster which seems to result in them growing almost twice as fast as the other civs for the entire ancient erra they are ahead of everyone and most of the middle as well. I'm in the industrial age now and there still in first and there empire is huge like the chinese the only difference is there cities aren't all 1.2.3.4.5 there 7,8,9,10,11,12. Thats the difference between an expansion and a regular civ. There is something about exp civs we are missing its value is deceptive IMO.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MarshalN
|
|
I think expansionist give you a possible early lead -- in getting an extra settler, in getting a few more early techs, and in getting early contacts (that you can trade) and a bigger map (that you can trade too).
Down the road when you hit industrial age, expansionist is useless. So you have to utilize it as much as you can early on, or it's just a waste.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16.
Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
21-11-2001 06:41
|