 |
|
vee4473
|
 |
New Jersey
Feb 2000 time: 00:16
|
|
Hello there all,
I am just wondering if anyone has thought about this.
If you save a game you are in, where you haven't explored the whole map, and choose to retire instead of quit, you get to see the replay of where every civilization has founded there cities and when.
Now, I know that that is just general information, but if you wanted to know where each civ is and how many cities they have, all you have to do is save, retire, view the replay and load the game again.
Do you think that they should have included some sort of programming where, if you retire (instead of quit), that you can't load that game anymore?
Does anyone consider this a legitimate strategy?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jason
|
|
Halifax, NS, Canada
Aug 1999 time: 05:16
|
|
It's cheating, but nothing too huge unless you make a point of remembering where everything is.
A little like reloading because you did a turn accidentally or forgot to do something.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
sachmo71
|
|
de Tejas
May 2001 time: 23:16
|
|
Well, it depends on when you use it. 4000 AD, it's pretty big. You get mapmaking, you could make short work of the world by knowing where all of the cities are. Later, you will probably have a complete world map from trading, etc, so it isn't a big deal. IMHO, a big part of the fun is exploring the world, so you would be missing out on that. Mostly cheating yourself, I suppose.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Whiplashr
|
 |
Milwaukee, WI
Nov 2001 time: 23:16
|
|
I reluctantly agree, but only because I do it
I'd like to offer up my "rationalization" for why I do it, fully
admitting that I'm rationalizing cheating.
Sometimes games don't always go the way you want.
You may go an hour in to find out you are totally surrounded
by expansionist or aggressive civs and never really get a
good start and are limited in where you can go.
I know, a true die hard Civ'er would deal with it and turn
that negative into a postive and try to find a way out of
it. But by using this technique you can immediately find
out "wow, got the Aztecs and Russians each right on
top of me" and can then decide if you want to deal with
it or not.
As I said, rationalization... But for what it's worth, I only
do it right at the beginning, for the rationale I listed, as
well as wanting to make sure things look somewhat
fair for everyone. Another thing I hated in Civ2 was
starting a game and one AI wipes out another at 2750BC.
I find it useful to just take a quick glance and see if everyone
is somewhat evenly spread out. I don't memorize the terrain
or placement or make a rush to find those people, and I don't
quit mid game to see how I'm doing (It's easy enough to see
how you rank vs everyone else after a little while in because
you can see how many cities everyone has, what everyones
score is, etc).
Jim
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Surgeon
|
|
yes its sorta cheating but I do it as I cant stand wasting huge amounts of my time on an unwinnable map.
Not a bug as it can only be done on the single player map therefore you are only ruining it for yourself
|
|
|  |
 |
|
egovalor
|
|
No such thing really as "cheating" in such a game. If you had a human opponent, sure it would be. Basically you are just playing for fun, not competition, so whatever you do to make it more enjoyable is alright.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boney
|
|
Thailand
Jan 2001 time: 05:16
|
|
I totally agree with Ego and Skank, there isn't such a thing as cheating in single player. It is called having fun. Though sometimes by cheating we can improve our own game by looking at AI tactics, ie by reloading we can test different units effectiveness in combat. MP is different.
As I said in another thread it is up to your personal self-satisfaction.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|