 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
TechWins
|
 |
Arizona
Apr 2001 time: 22:16
|
|
My opinion on the game seems to be fairly close to Yin's. In that a patch could actually finish Civ3, but it's still not a proven. What makes everybody think that patching will save the game? Now I'm not saying it won't, but from what we have already seen of Civ3 we should think quite the contrary to that. So my advice to you is to at least wait for people's opinions on how well the patch improves (comletes?) Civ3.
IMO, the best way to find out if the game is good or not is to read only the worst reviews of the game. If those certain people find the game to be pitiful what makes you think that you won't find the game to be terrible?
So far my experience with Civ3 has been frustrating and dull. At first I couldn't get the game working on my computer; then when I finally was able to play the game I was very dissapointed. The game just didn't live up to my expectations and that's in more than one category. In fact, I haven't even played Civ3 (without Korn's mod) in over a couple of weeks.
Quite possibly the only thing that might save this game will be modding, but then again you can't change the core of the game with the modding that is available to users. It's just a shame that the editable source code wasn't included with the game. If it were I could promise you that Civ3 would have already been finished to our standards by now, considering all of the fabulous contributors there are to the game.
Last edited by TechWins on 26-11-2001 at 10:48
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|