 |
|
shade
|
 |
of bribery.
May 2001 time: 06:16
|
|
Well,it has been a few weeks now,so most of you got past the hysteria of the fisrt few days.What do you think of this Civ game??
good,bad, annoying as hell,could be worse,heaven on earth???
How many bugs did you already catch bugging you??
Shade
Last edited by shade on 01-12-2001 at 20:54
|
|
|  |
 |
|
YefeiPi
|
|
Canada
Jul 2001 time: 00:16
|
|
Let me put it this way since I have played Civ2, Alpha Centauri, and Civ3 each extensively.
Civ3 is a lot better than Civ2 but not alpha centauri, which have a slight edge over Civ3 in terms of depth and some extra game features.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Daveraver
|
|
State of Confusion
Nov 2001 time: 00:16
|
|
There are so many things I hate about this game... some of which can be fixed in a patch... the only problem is: It still posesses the addictive qualtities of heroin and other barbituates. I can't stop playing... so could you guys at Firaxis just fix it so that the time I DO spend playing wont be broken by intermittant bouts of swearing and striking of the monitor.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
taco
|
|
I bought it thinking it would be a fun little thing to pass the time with (i am NOT a Civ fanatic), however it sucked me straight in and won't let me go. Civ1 didn't do it to me, SMAC didn't do it for me, and i never played Civ2. I liked Civ and SMAC but never really got into them. I am totally absorbed in Civ3.
Therfore, WAY better than i expected.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Setsuna
|
|
quote: Originally posted by yin26
It's one of the worst games I've ever played. It's shallow. It's a micro-management nightmare. |
First of all, my apologies for being slow and not paying attention. :P
Now, my question. Since when did you hate the game? I thought you were impressed. Your first impression, but impressed nonetheless.
If you could direct me to a thread or give me a quick run-down I'd be grateful.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yin26
|
 |
This space reserved for Darkstar.
Apr 1999 time: 14:16
|
|
Sorry I was so brief. I had to run out the door for a meeting.
My above statement is true -- for me. But you are right that it was enjoyable for the first few games, but as I got onto the 3rd and 4th games, the micro-management of workers, the massively ugly landscape filled willy-nilly (no, just packed solid) with roads and mines, the move one unit at time -- dozens to a hundred times A TURN! -- combined with the various bugs simply wore me down.
So I can say: It's great fun for about a week. After that, I have found it to be one of the worst games (certainly of this series) ever made. Oh, it's certainly 'a Civ game,' but it really brings nothing worth mentioning to the table, and those things people often mention -- like culture -- also soon seem shallow and inscrutable. In other words, frustration heaped upon tedium.
Anyway: Borrow a copy from a friend or something to try for yourself. You mind find parts that you really enjoy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dev
|
|
What Yin said.
He perfectly describes how I feel about Civ3.
It's fun for a few games but has no longevity in it's current state.
Last time I started Civ3 I loaded up the apolyton tourney game I was playing, looked at the ~20 worker stack I had to move from one polluted tile to another and simply thought screw it and turned the CPU off.
/dev
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Monoriu
|
|
How many bugs are bugging me?
One. Air superiority.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Special_Olympic
|
|
I like it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dev
|
|
No it wouldn't.
Workers are just an example, moving 20 military units is the same click-o-rama.
I don't want to automate my workers anyway, I want an easy way to move "stacks".
/dev
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MattHiggs
|
|
It's 'way better than I expected'
When the patch comes out it'll be perfection... I hope.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|