 |
|
ike0481
|
|
Texas
Nov 2001 time: 23:16
|
|
CTP2 in my opinion is an ok game. A lot of people have a lot of negative things to say about it but overall it wasn't that bad. They implemented a lot of neat concepts such as unit stacking in army's (up to twelve units moving together across the map to attack with combined arms is really great compared to CivIII's combat system.) and lots of great Public Works stuff like Radar sites and sea fisheries that enhanced the game. In my opinion CivIII is still a better game and personally I would wait for the patch before spending the money on CTP2.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Allemand
|
|
Olympia
Feb 2000 time: 05:16
|
|
CTP is the worst of the Civ group, and I swore never to buy another game from that company. However, some people liked CTP and probably also like CTP2. The question is, how can you get an impartial analysis without testing it yourself?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Phalanx2000
|
|
Dallas Tejas
Dec 2000 time: 05:16
|
|
I am so furious with Civ3 that I will be returning to CTP2 (which was a GREAT game on it's own) until which time I feel Civ3 has been patched or updated or whatever to the standards that I expect. And judging by the progress so far, I'd say that will be never.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Deathray
|
|
High Wycombe
Oct 2001 time: 05:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jerk
If you did not like Call To Power 1 then I would NOT buy Call to Power 2 at all. I suggest you consult the Apolyton archives and read the complaints about CTP2. The worst was Activision's decision to put out a half-patch and wash their hands of it. CTP does have some things that I like versus Civ3.
1) Stacked combat. More importantly stacked troop movement. This significantly reduces the amount of clicking necessary to wage war. The downside with stacked combat was defense. You have to maintain a large army in your city because another player could come in with a huge stack of units to threaten you.
2) Public works, more tile improvements. By using public works you eliminate the need for workers and the need to sit and watch them scramble around. This reduces the time it takes for each turn.
3) SLIC/SLIC2. This is mostly something for the mod makers to use. It allows them to make dramatic gameplay changes and MUCH more flexibility. The lack of a scripting language (Locutus' largest complaint) really hurts Civ3.
There are many complainers over the lack of Multiplayer in Civ3. I myself wish there was but lets take a look at CTP2. CTP2 did ship with Multiplayer (but if i am not mistaken there was no hotseat of pbem). Multiplayer had a number of problems. The worst was the constant resynchs between the host and other players (the game would have to pretty much reload itself from the host after it realizes that it is not in synch). In my experience once it happened it would happen almost every turn. CTP2 also shipped with numerous real bugs that would crash the game. Civ3 has yet to crash on me. It has bugs no doubt but nothing that kills the game. |
Civ 3 is a lot less bugged than people say it is. There are three gameplay bugs: the 9999999 gold bug, the air superiority bug and the coastal fortress bug. There are probably some hardware related crashing/slowdown bugs as well, although I haven't seen many reports of crashing. This makes it among the least bugged games ever released. I mean, think about it. It was only last year that Diablo II was released. How can you call Civilization III buggy in comparison with that? Indeed, how can you call Civilization III a bad game in comparison with that rubbish ;-)
Then there's the lack of multiplayer and the unfinished editor. Both annoying, both will impact negatively on the game's longevity. The editor is supposed to be fixed in the patch at least. As for multiplayer, I see their problem. It would be nice if they at least incorporated LAN and PBEM support of some sort.
Other than that its all just personal preference. Some people can't cope with the corruption, and some can't cope with their modern armour occasionally being beaten by older units. Dealing with these things is simply a case of altering your playing style.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrWhereItsAt
|
 |
New Year's Resolution: 2005 is the year of Where It's At - come get some.
Nov 2001 time: 17:16
|
|
Hm, p'raps I should rephrase... What is different about CTP2 that makes it better than CTP and Civ3? CTP had combined arms, PW, future advances yada yada also, BUT ppl seem to like CTP2 if they got it and dislike CTP if they had only that. I wonder, is there anyone who got CTp and STILL bought CTP2 after and enjoyed it? Or did the original spoil CTP2 for everyone like it did for me?
Is there anyone who has CTP, CTP2 AND Civ3 and can summarize the best features of each as distinct to the others? Oh, and as far as Multiplayer is concerned, not only am I a longtime (since Civ in '91) TBS player, I cannot even imagine playing against any but the AI, not the least because of my infinitely slow Net connection, but also 'cause of the impossibility of finding another player at the times I can play - 12 hours difference to Europe here, you know! (Making it 10 am)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|