 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Lonestar
Well, they ain't Dutch.... |
how do you know for sure?
Holland and Germany are located very close together 
about the law.. bubble..POP!
one person raised a legitimate question though. How do we stop EU laws we don't like since the EU seems "distant".
Answer: through your government. And in the near future through the European Parliement.
The EU being distant is a problem for the EU too and it tries to solve it more than it did before.
Anyone who is interested should check out the belgian PM's initiatives on that one.
Last edited by Bereta_Eder on 04-12-2001 at 07:17
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Stefu
paiktis, what I see as the most distressing is that even if this doesn't go through, it still might be shade of things to come in brand spankin' new unified Europe. Only way to do something like that would be US-style loose federation, IMHO. |
Not really. It seems to me like the product of a rushed "brainstorming" session...
It also seems like it is a "nice" political tool to "prove" who is less xenophobe than the other amongst the buerocrats of Brussels. But the last say is to the 15 ministers (AND the Parliement).
quote:
Well, this would at least get the support of two of big three (France and Germany) and quite a lot follows from France and Germany. Then there are countries ruled by Social Democrats or other such prties, which, IIRC, still make up the majority of European countries. (Mmm, are the new governments up already in Norway and Denmark? I'm not sure.) |
Social democrats are not the same throughout Europe. They hold very similar values but not all believe in the same means to promote them. (IIRC 11 out of 15 states have social democrats in power).
quote:
Well, even the basic ideals aren't all that hot - lose of free speech and all that - and compromise implementation wouldn't be that hot an idea, either. And if you don't comply, you're a big mean racist and we won't play with you.  |
How does this law (THAT SUCKS BIG TIME) prevents you from speaking your mind? (maybe I missed something?)
quote:
They still couldn't go *too* far from the basic ideals of the legislation. |
It depends on the form of adoption that will be chosen. If it is a reccomandation the member states don;t even have to do anything about it.
Also since the law is about the "harseness" of penalties, the national courts do have a big say INMHO.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
I quote the wise penguinator:
quote:
They need to sort out the rules of the problem, not gestures towards crushing the symptoms. It is stupid. Education is the answer, not legislation of what would probably be unenforcable laws, and ones that could cause a lot of resentment. |
That's what I think too.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Saint Marcus
|
 |
Scio Me Nihil Scire
Jan 1970
time: 06:16
|
|
Ok, before I go into detail to address the comments made here, let me explain the law as it exists here in Holland.
These laws have existed for decades. Nothing new here.
Freedom of speech exists here, but there's one condition. It isn't allowed to make hatefull remarks about certain specific groups (minorities mostly) in public will not be allowed. You won't get thrown in jail for that though, just a fine.
Some examples of things that happen(ed) here in Dutch politics)
Saying that all foreigners should be put in camps is an offense.
Saying in public that you think Holland is too crowded and you want to severely limit the admitance of foreigners in Holland, is not an offense.
Saying that being gay is as bad as stealing, is an offense. Fine $200.
Saying the Holocaust never happened is an offense.
NOTE: This also only applies to things said in public. As long as you keep it private it is allowed.
NOTE2: This is the Dutch situation
I re-read the article. Makes no sense at all really.
quote:
It was not clear yesterday how the law would affect radical Islamic groups that openly promote anti-Semitic and anti-Christian views. |
An act of anti-semetism and anti-christianity by Islamic groups is an offense.
quote:
Nor was it clear how it would apply to political parties opposed to mass immigration, such as Austria's Freedom Party, Belgium's Vlaams Blok, and the Danish People's Party, all of which have become serious political forces. |
Being oposed to mass immigration isn't an offense.
quote:
The law could potentially cover many stand-up comedians, and even Anne Robinson, who, during an appearance on BBC television this year, described the Welsh as "irritating". |
A comedian saying Welsh are irritating isn't an offense.
A comedian saying Hitler was a great man and the holocaust never happened is an offense, unless said in a clearly non-serious way.
quote:
The proposals, which will require the unanimous backing of all 15 states, are aimed at ending the patchwork of different laws across the European Union and establishing a common definition that can be used by all judges. |
This is of course a good thing.
quote:
The commission appears to have adopted the most restrictive code - Germany's - as the basis for the rest of the EU. |
Germany only acts strongly against pro-Nazi sentiments (not a surprise). In other situations they aren't any worse or better than Dutch or French laws. Belgian laws are somewhat looser, but still have restrictions.
quote:
Nigel Farage MEP, the party's chairman, said: "I'm morbidly xenophobic about this new country called the European Union, so if that is covered by this law then I'm most certainly xenophobic and I could be extradited anywhere. |
And someone is taking that comment seriously? 
Obvious conclusion: article is extremely anti-EU, filled with obviously false or extremely stupid remarks, and it's all a lot of fuss about nothing. Note that the article also states Germany already has those type of laws, so why are so many people here on OT suddenly so shocked? It's a law that exists for 50 years!
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Chris 62
|
 |
But I'm feeling MUCH better now
Jan 2001
time: 00:16
|
|
Just as I had forseen, my two favorite European appologists tried to spin doctor their way out of this, one by airely dismissing it as "no big deal" (but we all know it is) and the other by trying to twist it into a USA is culturally different, so you don't understand. (sorry Mein herr,we get it just fine. )
There is a REAL reason why we call ourselves the land of the free, and your EU NEVER will!  quote:
Originally posted by Mark L
Ok, before I go into detail to address the comments made here, let me explain the law as it exists here in Holland. |
Watch those spinning wheels!
quote:
These laws have existed for decades. Nothing new here. |
So you say you have had thought police for years?
Amazing.
quote:
Freedom of speech exists here, but there's one condition. It isn't allowed to make hatefull remarks about certain specific groups (minorities mostly) in public will not be allowed. You won't get thrown in jail for that though, just a fine. |
And you call THAT freedom of speech?
Here you can say what you like, people may hate you for it, but you won't be fined for it.
Some "Freedom" you have there.
quote:
Some examples of things that happen(ed) here in Dutch politics) |
Lead on!
quote:
Saying that all foreigners should be put in camps is an offense. |
You would be either laughed at or mocked in the USA for such a statement.
Are you such a weak people you need laws to govern how you think?
quote:
Saying in public that you think Holland is too crowded and you want to severely limit the admitance of foreigners in Holland, is not an offense. |
Do they issue you a manuel, so you know what is offensive and finable, and what is not?
quote:
Saying that being gay is as bad as stealing, is an offense. Fine $200. |
Here, we call that an opinion, and a stupid one at that.
So tell me, how is this better than the facsism you all fear so greatly?
quote:
Saying the Holocaust never happened is an offense. |
Here we call that stupidity, but it's still not an offense.
quote:
NOTE: This also only applies to things said in public. As long as you keep it private it is allowed. |
So you can be a dirty little racist pig, just so long as no one knows about it?
quote:
NOTE2: This is the Dutch situation |
Is the rest of Europe this bad off?
Who else over there has this "thought police" state thrust upon them?
quote:
I re-read the article. Makes no sense at all really. |
Yes, from what you say, you ALREADY have the things they are proposing.
quote:
An act of anti-semetism and anti-christianity by Islamic groups is an offense. |
It would have to be a physical act for it to be a crime in the USA.
quote:
Being oposed to mass immigration isn't an offense. |
Well, at least SOMETHING is allowed.
quote:
A comedian saying Welsh are irritating isn't an offense.
A comedian saying Hitler was a great man and the holocaust never happened is an offense, unless said in a clearly non-serious way. |
Do you have people who enforce these matters?
Inspectors that monitor performances to insure they are up to standards?
Do the people report these "offensive" comedians to the authorities?
Who determines it said "in a clearly non-serious way"?
quote:
This is of course a good thing. |
Not much else here seems to be. 
quote:
Germany only acts strongly against pro-Nazi sentiments (not a surprise). In other situations they aren't any worse or better than Dutch or French laws. Belgian laws are somewhat looser, but still have restrictions. |
Thought police throughout the region, very sad....
quote:
And someone is taking that comment seriously? |
To us in the USA, what you accept as nothing is monsterous.
A trampling of basic human freedoms, but hey, it's your country, do as you like.
quote:
Obvious conclusion: article is extremely anti-EU, filled with obviously false or extremely stupid remarks, and it's all a lot of fuss about nothing. Note that the article also states Germany already has those type of laws, so why are so many people here on OT suddenly so shocked? It's a law that exists for 50 years! |
Well, as I said, in the USA, such laws are an abomination.
We are suprised you love to critisize the USA, when you live in a horrid police state.
And now, from the alps straight to us...quote:
It is a cultural difference just as it is a bit strange for us to imagine a right to bear arms or to have an abortion as fundamental rights. |
Yes, but at least we don't try to regulate the thoughts of our citizens.
We can't imagine how you could be backward enough to NOT want said rights, as you say, cultural differences I suppose.
quote:
The US approach is to have theoretically no content control on speech. This "radical" approach only has a counterpart maybe in the freedom of science or art, but not in speech in general. Just as you can have reasonable searches and seizures, you can have content limitations on speech ranging from defamation over commercial speech limits for attorneys or doctors to propagating racism. |
Sounds like a justifacation to me.
We seem to accept that words won't destroy us, it seems that Europe doesn't accept that, and seeks to regulate it's people's feelings.
Quite sad, really.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
What about the recent French law requiring that 50% of all political candidates be women?
Oh, and then there was the initiative in Norway to abolish the stand up urinal in men's bathrooms.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Chris 62
|
|
But I'm feeling MUCH better now
Jan 2001
time: 00:16
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Mark L
Difference of culture and history. If the USA was invaded and raped by Nazis you'd feel different too. |
Hardly, we are made of sterner stuff than to sucomb to our fears of ideas.
quote:
Just like now people are arrested in the US for "supposed" but totally unproven ties to Bin Laden. How free is that? |
Private info on your part?
There are no such cases.
quote:
Here we can smoke pot, but not carry guns. |
So you can slowly kill yourself, yet be totally helpless if attack.
Big advantage.
quote:
Here prostitution, abortion and euthanasia is legal, but being a neo-nazi is not. |
Good plan, makes the ills of society leagal, since you obviously had no better plan.
quote:
Difference of culture and history. If WW2 had never happened these laws would never exist. And like I said, it isn't thought police. You can think what you want, you can speak privately about anything, but you can't say clearly offensive and morally wrong statements in public. If you do you won't get locked away US/Nazi-style...you just get a fine. A fine, that's it. |
Ha ha ha ha, child, nobody gets a fine or locked away for what they think, nor must we hide behind closed doors to think!
quote:
Also really funny how Americans here say we now live in a police state when people in the USA are being arrested left and right for no good reasons, and the laws this thread is about have existed since the end of WW2. |
Show ONE case of that.
You can't because it more of your "facts".
quote:
And please note that this is not some totalitarian regulation since most people here agree that they are right and just. It's a democracy after all, the people have spoken. |
How can you tell?
If they don't like what you say, it's against the law! 
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16.
Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-12-2001 04:57
Let's hope nothing comes out of it.
|