 |
|
walldummer
|
|
noonestupidenoughtodiscoversuchshitnowshutupandpla
ythebestgamever
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Xentropy
|
|
Firaxis will respond again and again to questions about civ-specific starting locations, to say again and again that they can't say anything, but they won't respond to my unique in comparison complaint?
And please, people, why must you enter my thread and turn it into another flame war? >sighs<
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Badtz Maru
|
|
The reason Firaxis isn't addressing this bug is that it appears you are the only person suffering from it. I frequently play Expansionist civilizations and therefore most of my early techs come from goody huts, and I've never seen this. I frequently get The Wheel from huts and that is always followed by horses showing up on the map. I'm pretty sure I've got Iron Working from huts before too and have never had a problem where there was no iron anywhere on the map - maybe not in MY portion of the map, but that's not a bug, just a problem that has to be overcome in-game.
Try reinstalling, it could be that there's a glitch somewhere in your install, it happens.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
eRAZOR
|
|
You're wasting your time buddy. They don't respond - unless they can point you in the direction of the freakin' editor.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
What's the point in posting something that everyone can plainly see is demonstrably false? The numerous Firaxian posts can be seen by everyone here.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pachabel
|
|
I've never encountered the goody hut thing, but a huge bug is the 'trade with a tribe that is killed off by a third party' thing. The other civs treat you as if you broke the agreement. This is a huge bug that really affects gameplay.
I was really surprised that it wasn't among the fixes as it happens so often and damages outcomes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Herder
|
|
I think any company that ignores a customer is making a mistake. Some of the most valid complaints I have seen have been via a rant.
Whether the delivery of criticisms is considered civil or not, the complaint is a valid complaint. Sure, some ranters have no consideration for other peoples effort or feelings but when you are dealing with the public that is something that you accept.
Regardless of the vehicle for delivering a complaint, the flaw is still there and if a company chooses to pick what it wants to listen to then they are heading down a path of self-destruction. Just ask Lotus, WordPerfect and many others.
You cannot be afford to be elitist when you are selling a product or responsible for the marketing of said product.
If you think the people with complaints are vocal here and want to suppress said complaints, they will just take it elsewhere and that makes others exposed to said ranting. That is certainly not good for the company in question.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pachabel
|
|
Herder, I have to disagree. Companies will be more successful if they listen to reasonable complaints and suggestions. Childish rants filled with insults, illogic and conspiracy theories (wishes, often) are a waste of time, as they are generally misleading and not totally earnest.
Irrational people do not act with reason and therefore do not logically follow paths that might hurt a business. They will say they hate the product more than anything in the universe and continue buying it.
It's the rational, well-thought out and well-presented complaints that carry weight because those are coupled with a predictable and negative result for the company.
It's clearly in a company's best interest to prioritize rational levelheaded complaints over maniacal rants any and everyday.
Best wishes,
P
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Herder
|
|
Nice post Pachabel.
While I agree with some of your post I think you miss my point.
I never indicated that the company should act on all rants but within that rant is a complaint, whether delivered properly or not.
Is it in the best interests of the company to ignore a customer's plea, whether rantish or not? No. It isn't.
Sometimes these ranters just want their issue acknowledged, that's all and with just doing that a company can defuse a person from angry ranter to satisfied customer.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
Actually, Ming, I'm not sure how much bearing civility has on getting answers from Dan and Soren.
No one has been more civil toward them than I. But I have yet to get any answer to any question. Still, I understand the many reasonable possible causes for that.
But you're right about the ranting. It is like trying to reason with a man in a drunken rage.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gachnar
|
 |
Arlington, VA
Nov 2001 time: 00:16
|
|
Erazor (and partially Libertarian):
Its not Firaxis's job to listen to respond to you.
Most software companies dont waste the time taking part in things like this. So when Soren and Dan and Jeff try to answer questions and give people information and tips, you should be happy they spent their time doing something to benefit the users.
Instead, some people seem to think that if the Firaxians don't help, they are betraying their fans. And, (sorry to pick on you, I normally read your posts), Libertarian seems to feel that he has been cheated.
Think about that.
He feels cheated because one of the main game developers hasn't responded to one of his posts.
When did we turn into stuck up brats?
When I had problems with a bug in Diablo II I didn't whine when I told and didn't have anyone from the design team respond to me. But everyone expects more from Firaxis. Probably because they do more. But no company can make all of us happy.
And I honestly believe that there are some people who simply will never be happy. They will never find that amazing feeling of excitement they had when they played CivI, or CivII, or CTP. Now their expectations are so horribly high that no game will ever reach it.
If you dont find CivIII fun, then go find a game that is. Or go make one.
I'll use Blizzard again because everyone respects them as a software house. How long did it take to make Starcraft perfect? 2 years? Its been over a year with Diablo II and they are still fixing little bugs. How long do you want to wait for a game?
The game I bought was worthwhile right out of the box. Most games dont even come with editors. It was fun without changes. It wasn't always what I would have designed, but I'm no longer 5 years old, so I'm willing to accept someone elses ideas.
And finally, I find it hard to believe that you (erazor) as a developer (me too) dont understand this. I'm sure you never ship any products with unfinished functionality. No bugs either. If you actually design your own projects, you'll know that idealistic plans often dont get fulfilled the first time.
Sorry Firaxians. I'm truly sorry that you just can't make some people happy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
eRAZOR
|
|
quote: Originally posted by gachnar
Erazor (and partially Libertarian):
Its not Firaxis's job to listen to respond to you.
Most software companies dont waste the time taking part in things like this. So when Soren and Dan and Jeff try to answer questions and give people information and tips, you should be happy they spent their time doing something to benefit the users.
Instead, some people seem to think that if the Firaxians don't help, they are betraying their fans. And, (sorry to pick on you, I normally read your posts), Libertarian seems to feel that he has been cheated.
Think about that.
He feels cheated because one of the main game developers hasn't responded to one of his posts.
When did we turn into stuck up brats?
When I had problems with a bug in Diablo II I didn't whine when I told and didn't have anyone from the design team respond to me. But everyone expects more from Firaxis. Probably because they do more. But no company can make all of us happy.
And I honestly believe that there are some people who simply will never be happy. They will never find that amazing feeling of excitement they had when they played CivI, or CivII, or CTP. Now their expectations are so horribly high that no game will ever reach it.
If you dont find CivIII fun, then go find a game that is. Or go make one.
I'll use Blizzard again because everyone respects them as a software house. How long did it take to make Starcraft perfect? 2 years? Its been over a year with Diablo II and they are still fixing little bugs. How long do you want to wait for a game?
The game I bought was worthwhile right out of the box. Most games dont even come with editors. It was fun without changes. It wasn't always what I would have designed, but I'm no longer 5 years old, so I'm willing to accept someone elses ideas.
And finally, I find it hard to believe that you (erazor) as a developer (me too) dont understand this. I'm sure you never ship any products with unfinished functionality. No bugs either. If you actually design your own projects, you'll know that idealistic plans often dont get fulfilled the first time.
Sorry Firaxians. I'm truly sorry that you just can't make some people happy. |
Return to your home galaxy. Thank you and bon voyage.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|