 |
|
Frugal_Gourmet
|
|
New York City, NY, USA
Jan 1970 time: 00:16
|
|
A lot of these complaints could be easily resolved if people wouldn't try all playing the "huge maps". If you don't want massive corruption or the inability to conquer the world or lots of micro-management, play on a reasonably sized map. You'll find a lot of these problems dwindle to nothingness.
I think the corruption was originally modeled on the normal-sized map.
The game was difficult at first, but now that I have the hang of it it's a lot more fun than Civ 2.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dravin
|
|
North Pole, Alaska
Nov 2001 time: 22:16
|
|
I'm playing on a tiny map and corruption is horrible as well. (They should let you rush build the Forbidden Palace if you ask me, normally that is.)
Of course the effects of distance and the number of cities until corruption changes for each map size, so a Civ that would have minimal corruption on one map size, if transplanted on another map size could have crippling corruption.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Venger
|
|
Keeper of the Can-O'Whoopass
Jan 1970 time: 23:16
|
|
I'm playing on a large map and corruption is horrific - oh sure, if you want to sit and have about 20 cities it's okay, but try and expand to be a large country - forget it! I had about 80 cities when I had finally had enough...corruption was still bad, even with editor mods...
Venger
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|