 |
|
ak
|
|
I just took an enemy city after a hard fought and planned battle. So a couple of turns later, the city deposes my governor - with 10 of my units garrisoned in it. OK, now that ticked me off, but I'm thinking, well that's the culture thing, so I'll deal with it. Next turn I take the city back again with some adjacent units and my worst fears were realized. The garrisoned units *vanished*. We're talking mucho shields into the ether. Boy - I felt like putting the game on the shelf and going back to a normal life, right then and there. But wait, surely there must be some logical explanation as to why that happens...........NAH!
Last edited by ak on 07-12-2001 at 15:02
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ak
|
|
looks like a quick temple might be a fix but I don't know if it's foolproof.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
bahoo
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ak
But wait, surely there must be some logical explanation as to why that happens...........NAH! |
No one has been able to produce a logical reason yet.
Tons of ways around it have been figured out, but as far as a logical reason as to why your troops dematerialize, nope, nadda!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ak
|
|
thanks for the hints Skanky.
A couple of points:
- I did have a higher total cultural value - though the AI was relatively high too.
- there were a couple cannon in the mix which may have thrown the equation off - as in your comments. Other than culture, I'm wondering if the number of non-arty units you garrison is the greatest factor in determining revolt chances.
- you have to decide up front if you want to raze the city and you just don't know which ones will revolt. I tend to want to spare fat, strategically located cities. Unfortunately, the revolt doesn't happen till after you've decided to spare it and it's too late to raze at that point.
- I think it's strange to have the units vanish, as opposed to being booted to your nearest city, or something to that effect.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
henry296
|
|
The only explanation I can come up with is that those troops were killed during the coup to cause the city to go back under than control of anohter civ.
Todd
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
davwhitt
|
|
Raleigh, NC
Nov 2001 time: 00:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ak
I just took an enemy city after a hard fought and planned battle. So a couple of turns later, the city deposes my governor - with 10 of my units garrisoned in it. OK, now that ticked me off, but I'm thinking, well that's the culture thing, so I'll deal with it. Next turn I take the city back again with some adjacent units and my worst fears were realized. The garrisoned units *vanished*. We're talking mucho shields into the ether. Boy - I felt like putting the game on the shelf and going back to a normal life, right then and there. But wait, surely there must be some logical explanation as to why that happens...........NAH! |
I have asked myself the same question and there is no rational explaination. Take World War II for example. France certainly had more culture than Germany but you didn't see Parisians taking the city back destroying the Wehrmacht without a fight. I believe that *if* a captured city is allowed to revolt it should do so in a manner similar to slave revolts in CTP where a number of conscript basic units (the number based on the captured city's population) attacks your garrison. If they win they retake the city, if you win you crush the rebellion. In one game I had all but wiped out the Egyptians who had less culture and one of their cities kept converting this one turn. Making it worse this was a city I had captured many turns earlier and had built a Temple and Courthouse in but it still converted. It had a population of 6 and I kept adding units to it and saving the game it every time it converted back to Egypt. I would reload (yes I cheat sometimes!) and add more units. It took 15 units to prevent the city from converting! This is enough to fill 5 armies! I'd like to know how a city of 6 could overthrow 12+ infantry/cavalry. I can't believe Firaxis actually has made it easier for cities to be converted by culture in the patch. I don't think genocide is the best answer either (razing the city and/or bombing it killing all but 1 of the population).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Venger
|
|
Keeper of the Can-O'Whoopass
Jan 1970 time: 23:16
|
|
I must restate as I echo Davwhitts well stated post - there is a better way. As he said, genocidal destruction of entire cities is offensive and dull. CTP did indeed have a better way. I have even offered that these cities should lose population points and have a guerilla unit spawn, a 6/6 unit that requires no support from the sponsor (old owner) Civ. This would be a much smarter, more elegant way to handle the concept of resistance in a captured city.
But to simply give it back over culture is a real gameplay joke.
Venger
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vonotar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ak
I just took an enemy city after a hard fought and planned battle. So a couple of turns later, the city deposes my governor - with 10 of my units garrisoned in it. OK, now that ticked me off, but I'm thinking, well that's the culture thing, so I'll deal with it. Next turn I take the city back again with some adjacent units and my worst fears were realized. The garrisoned units *vanished*. We're talking mucho shields into the ether. Boy - I felt like putting the game on the shelf and going back to a normal life, right then and there. But wait, surely there must be some logical explanation as to why that happens...........NAH! |
Either the units were destroyed when the governor was desposed (not sure if this is what happens) or, more likely, the AI could have disbanded the units in order to add shields to whatever it wanted to build.
It's not impossible for your units to vanish as the AI could have done something during it's turn.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
down th' pub
|
|
Chasin' Shadows in the Rain
Dec 2000 time: 05:16
|
|
So Darknight, you play a scientific Civ, for the others, the temple is cheaper.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
davwhitt
|
|
Raleigh, NC
Nov 2001 time: 00:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Darkknight
A library is better to build for culture then a temple. It only takes 3/4 of the time and gives +3 culture rather then just +2 for a temple. |
But revolts are more likely in cities with unhappy populations and temples help more than libraries in that manner. Not sure how much though so I guess it depends on how unhappy the city is as to whether a temple or library is better. It still doesn't make sense though. I can't imagine the Mongols getting kicked out of Kiev because they failed to build a temple or library.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
davwhitt
|
|
Raleigh, NC
Nov 2001 time: 00:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Vonotar
Either the units were destroyed when the governor was desposed (not sure if this is what happens) or, more likely, the AI could have disbanded the units in order to add shields to whatever it wanted to build. |
I fail to see how entire armies can suddenly vanish though. If they were destroyed then by who? If by the citizens of the city they garrison should they be allowed to fight back? Why is there no battle? Even if victorious the city should lose population points and some of the troops should be able to retreat (especially cavalry and tanks).
quote: It's not impossible for your units to vanish as the AI could have done something during it's turn. |
I do not feel comfortable with the idea that the AI can mysteriously make my armies vanish and cities convert. Culture is a good concept but Civ3 takes it too far. How many cities have changed sides in history due to culture?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vonotar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by davwhitt
I fail to see how entire armies can suddenly vanish though. If they were destroyed then by who?
...
I do not feel comfortable with the idea that the AI can mysteriously make my armies vanish and cities convert.
|
Umm, pick a city, pick a unit in the city, right-click, choose disband
Unit disappears!
There's nothing to say that the AI isn't doing precisely this straight after the city switches from you to it. After all if the troops are captured when the city converts it would actually make sense to disband them for shields as they would still have their original nationality.
When you regain the city on the next turn the troops are gone.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
davwhitt
|
|
Raleigh, NC
Nov 2001 time: 00:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Vonotar
Umm, pick a city, pick a unit in the city, right-click, choose disband
Unit disappears!
There's nothing to say that the AI isn't doing precisely this straight after the city switches from you to it. After all if the troops are captured when the city converts it would actually make sense to disband them for shields as they would still have their original nationality.
When you regain the city on the next turn the troops are gone. |
Simulations are suppose to mirror, as closely as possible, reality. Does anyone seriously think in 1939 Parisians could have overthrown the Wehrmacht and turn their tanks into an addition to the Louvre? Also, from my experience when I capture an enemy town with culture I do not get extra shields.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LeaninCowboy
|
|
The rioters have eaten the enemy army.
Gawd its so obvious. Didnt you notice after re-taking the city that the citizens were smiling with red liquid smeared across there mouths ?
Sheesh.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|