 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
I was once like you, Grasshopper. I defended Firaxis from the abusers until I found out first hand why they've let their emotions get the best of them. You will, too.
Oh, Great Void! May we have stack movement, please?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
quote: Originally posted by nato
Libertarian, does this mean you have, for lack of a better way to say it, switched sides? |
Well, I don't rant. I don't act like I'm on a crusade or anything, but yeah.
I staunchly defended Firaxis only to find my own questions summarily ignored. You might recall my recent thread about stack movement. I must say that, as their champion defender, I was... well... frankly embarrassed that my theretofore unwavering support didn't even merit the civility of a response.
How can my defense of them possibly hold? An even half-savvy debator can now always rebut anything I offer with, "They don't even listen to their supporters; how are we to believe they will listen to their critics?"
Thus, I haven't really "switched sides" so much as I've been abandoned. I certainly did my part. Naively, I suppose, now in retrospect.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
My simple answer would be this: yes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
kazper
|
|
I had a problem that prevented me from playing the game (The safedisc problem)
I tried sending a mail to Infogrames (as directed from the Civ3 support page), but after waiting 4 days I get the answer that they only help North Americans (I live in Denmark) - despite the fact that their support page had options for European countries as well. They refer me to the Infogrames UK site, which unfortunately doesn't have an email/support form, but only a phone number, so I'm supposed to call them at expensive overseas prices and hang on hold to tell them about their bugs? Forget it.
So I go to the Firaxis site and use the form there to submit my problem about a week ago and I never heard from them since. I've since solved my problem myself - yes I've cracked my original Civilization in order to play it... A joke.
So I go here again and see that it has been posted that I/we should contact Infogrames about getting an unsecured .exe file... Funny I wasn't told that, but has to read it here. Besides which I don't have any confidence that I'll get any useful reply from Infogrames after my last contact. So I rant and rave. I try to control it, but it's so very hard........
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ****gyRA
Good answer to an either/or question. Are you in politics as your name suggests? |
Lordy, no. Just a freelance philosopher whose worldview is a blend of Christianity, Libertarianism, and Objectivism.
Note how my worldview makes for a nice haiku.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jeffrey Morris FIRAXIS
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Libertarian
I staunchly defended Firaxis only to find my own questions summarily ignored. |
In this case it's because you're setup to get neither email or private messages. I don't have the time to stay current every day on every thread, so if you have a question, forget support@firaxis.com and send it to jmorris@firaxis.com. By the same time token I won't often respond to emails concerning:
a) feature requests we're well aware of or are impossible.
b) rants (if I can't find the legitimate question in 5 paragraphs of froth...)
c) technical issues documented on the infogrames tech support site
d) misc. since I miss emails from all sources every now and then.
Let me repeat it: jmorris@firaxis.com.
Jeff
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
I have not ever ranted against Firaxis. Not thrice. Not twice. Not even once.
Moreover, it seemed to me that this (and CivFanatics) is where they are answering questions. Cherry-picking, to be sure, but answering. It makes no sense to correspond by private message on such matters as stack movement, a concern of the whole community.
Do you mean to say that if I'd had PM turned on, you would have answered me privately, but would not have answered for the whole community to see? What would that mean to me, then? That I would have been held to secrecy? Or would have been expected to copy/paste your response here?
Why not just post a teensy line or two here? Why the tedious run-around?
- We're implementing a form of stack movement, and will advise everyone soon.
- We think late game tedium adds to the experience.
- Leave us alone.
Finally, I can understand that a person cannot read every thread. But that's a red herring. When a thread's very title includes "Questions for Firaxis" — and its originator is the man who defended you and yours against all assailants — then ignoring it is a clear message of "get the hell off our side".
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
Gah. The more I think about it, the more bizarre your post was, Jeff.
If you had the time to chastise me here, why didn't you just answer the question?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dev
|
|
You get one guess.....
In other related news my mouse informs me that it has abandoned the click abusing Civ3 game for the greener pastures of EU2.
/dev
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DaveV
|
 |
USA - EDT (GMT-5)
Jan 1970 time: 00:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Libertarian
Gah. The more I think about it, the more bizarre your post was, Jeff.
If you had the time to chastise me here, why didn't you just answer the question? |
No offense, but it seems to me he did:
quote: Originally posted by Jeffrey Morris FIRAXIS
a) feature requests we're well aware of or are impossible. |
You may recall a small controversy about editors and multiplayer capabilities after Firaxians posted something like "We're implementing a form of xxx, and will advise everyone soon". People start piling on with questions like: "what are you doing with xxx?" "Why isn't xxx done yet?" "Your game sux, here's how to fix it!" I am astounded at the patience of the Firaxians in dealing with the outright abuse they've endured, particularly in this forum.
Again, I'm not trying to offend you here, but does defending Firaxis in some of the threads entitle you to special treatment by them? These boards consist of people expressing their opinions. Either they think the game is great, terrible, or somewhere in the middle. Although most people fall into the third category, the first two categories are the ones who are motivated to keep posting here. You don't automatically become the buddy of everyone at Firaxis by joining the first group.
Firaxis is trying to run a business, and must allocate scarce resources in such a way as to maximize their profits. Once they've saturated the market, any additional investment into the game has pretty sketchy returns (like the nebulous concept of "goodwill"). They have shown a lot of enthusiasm and support for this game so far, and I'm optimistic that they'll add in the features they've said they will.
Sorry again for the diatribe. It bothers me when people here think that Firaxis owes them an answer to a question. Firaxis is, in my opinion, showing a commendable level of support and an amazing forbearance.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
No problem, Dave. All I wanted was an answer to the question.
Mind you, it wasn't a question that only I had. So far, three threads have been opened on the topic of group movement. Each one, including the current one, has been deluged with practically unanimous support from the players, stating their desire for the feature. They've stated unequivocally that lack of it seriously impedes their enjoyment of the game — the game that Firaxis is developing.
Now, you say that Jeff has answered this question. I see not one penumbra — yea, nary an interstice! — in Jeff's post that even remotely addresses group movement. I acquiesce to your superior reading comprehension. I will ask you simply because inquiring minds want to know: what was his answer to the question?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Expatriate
|
|
Syd for Køge....(Denmark)
Dec 2001 time: 06:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jeffrey Morris FIRAXIS I don't have the time to stay current every day on every thread, so if you have a question, forget support@firaxis.com and send it to jmorris@firaxis.com. |
So youre saying that the email adress thats supposed to be used for support issues is basically useless because noone bothers to check it once in a while? Why not remove it completly?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dan Magaha FIRAXIS
|
 |
The Metropolis known as Hunt Valley
Mar 2000 time: 00:16
|
|
If you are following the proper and established channels, you are not emailing Firaxis for support, you're emailing Infogrames. I posted a rather lengthy thread on CivFanatics about this last night. I won't rehash it all here, but the general point was that Infogrames is your support contact for Civ III. They're set up to handle the thousands and thousands of support inquiries and questions, we, as a small company of about 30 people, are not.
And no, this doesn't mean we don't care or that we're somehow trying to pass something off on Infogrames that we should be dealing with ourselves: it's part of the contract, it's their responsibility to handle support.
We do the best we can to answer all the emails that come in to us, some of which are general questions, and some of which are real support issues, but Infogrames are the organization you should be contacting for support.
And FYI, I check the various email boxes every day; frequently there are more than 400 messages in them. I respond to as many as I can on a daily basis but there is no way I can get to them all (though not for lack of trying).
Dan
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
Dan,
With respect to the issue of group movement, no one is asking for support. What we are asking for is an answer. Clearly, you do not intend to offer the courtesy of a reply.
I'm afraid that if we ask Infogrames this question, they might tell us to build a port.
Dave,
Thanks. I think I get it now.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|