 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
OldWarrior_42
|
|
Just a technical point of interest comment here.... For those that do not see how the audio could have been translated due to poor or almost inaudible sound, you would be amazed by the sophistication of some of the audio systems used to reproduce or decipher sound.
Technology is amazing these days. I trust the translation to be correct.
I also do not think the US Gov't released this tape to be seen as the end all evidence. It is clear , we are following our agenda, even before this tape was come upon.
It is more likely released to try to keep the emotion flowing in their favor. Seems a relatively usefull tactic if one was to continue down this path. And it is clear that the US is going to continue this route.
My personal opinion..... I didn't need the tape to form a judgement. I had already formed one based mainly on the media information of the UK and US. And I do not believe that the total of all media from these two countries are lying or in some sort of fantastic conspiracy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rufus T. Firefly
Without questioning the validity of the tapes per se, does anybody know any more about how it was found? "It was found in an abandoned house in Jalalabad" just seems beyond belief; you're conducting house-to-house searches in a place as big as Jalalabad, and you happen to grab this one videotape? I mean, did they know whose house it was? Did they just grab all videos they found, and sort them out later? ("Anything yet, Jim?" "No, but here's another Pamela/Tommy Lee for the pile.") Did it magically glisten like an object you're supposed to add to your inventory in a badly designed adventure game? Anybody have a sense of this? |
Scene, Jalalabad 12 hours after NA troops entered the town.
US Special Forces Intel Guy to NA buddy:
"Ask them (locals) if they have seen any Arabs recently."
Northern Alliance Guy:
"Not for several weeks, but there were some staying in a house near here then.
Spec. Forces Guy
"Where is this house?"
........................
There seems to be some confusion regarding the words Evidence and Proof in a legal context. For all of you for whom English is not your first language (and Osweld):
Evidence refers to something put before a court in order to establish proof of a case. There are rules as to what sorts of things can be put before a court. Statements made by a defendent are not only legal evidence in the vast majority of cases, they are considered strong evidence, especially when the statement was made without any obvious coercion.
For Proof lets take a look at what the Merriam Webster Dictionary says:
"the cogency of evidence that compels acceptance by the mind of a truth or a fact "
In a legal sense proof (either a proponderance of evidence in a civil matter or beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal matter) is required for the party bringing the suit or charge can prevail at a trial.
Thus the video tape is indeed evidence which defense lawyers could try to supress if they can prove it was phony, and would almost certainly try to cast doubt upon if it was presented at trial. For some it would constitute proof alone, but I don't doubt that if OBL is ever brought to trial there will be much more to bolster it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
sachmo71
|
|
de Tejas
May 2001 time: 23:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by faded glory
Im interested. What do you all think of this line. It may be a hint at future terrorist attacks?
Allah has bestowed on us...honor on us...and he will give us blessing and more victory during this holy month of Ramadan
What do you think? |
If he does pull an attack during Ramadan, wouldn't that damage his religious credibility?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|