 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
Seems to me the private e-mail business leads to troubles of its own. After getting my answer, would I not then come back here and share it with other gamers? Why then the weird cabalistic method of answering? Why must someone go like Moses to the mountain top to get answers and then bring them here on tablets of clay?
Firaxis has settled on a rather Neanderthal method of dealing with fan's questions, a method that turns them into detractors. It's all just so... bizarre.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
But what, exactly, are they working on? What have they even considered? Have they heard our requests? Are they bogged down thoroughly in their OS problems to the exclusion of all else? Will the next patch be simply a fix for the few with this problem?
Do they have any understanding at all how tedious the late game is? Do they acknowledge that this problem exists? Has not anyone at Firaxis ever played into the modern age and thought to himself, 'Damnation! This is tedious!'?
Keeping silent is a bad strategy, in my opinion. But what they are doing is worse than that. They are leaving hit-and-run posts like those in this thread that address nothing other than defense of their own myopic policy. They are leaving hit-and-run threads like the one that says that it is the place to post issues and bugs. In other words, they are being silent about things that matter to us, but are quite vocal about irrelevancies.
Their staff is limited. Their time is limited. But they have to make those same sort of "interesting decisions" that we make when we play Sid's games. They need to strike a balance. By spending nearly all their time working on God only knows what and ignoring us like we are unworthy of the most common decencies, they might well find that, down the road, when they finally put out a perfect game and seek to gloat in our admiration, we all shrug our shoulders in unison, and go 'Who cares? We've found something else.'.
Lib
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
Well, they're too late for that. I've already started talking.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CharlesUFarley
|
|
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 21:16
|
|
yin26 is absolutely accurate, I completely agree with him. 
Libertarian was also making a valid point, first of all the Civ3 website is useless. because the information is outdated, and the requests and emails go un-answered. So if we can't tell Firaxis what we think, due to lack of response. Do we get our $50 back, or take the loss? I think the only thing we can do is to vent our anger, and hope that Firaxis will eventually acknowledge it! And upon acknowledging it, respond to it! Hoek, obviously people are going to wait to see what Firaxis' comes up with. We wouldn't be "fans" if we didn't have some degree of support and respect. But you can't honestly believe its going to be a patient wait. You have to understand, Firaxis has had plenty of time, Civilization II came out in '96. And Civilization III began design in '99. So they had 3 years to "think it up" and they had 2 years to "design it". Even if the design didn't begin until '99 ... they still had 2 full years with a great design team to make it happen. Whats up with that? Personally, I would've settled for a later release date rather than a sh_tty version of Civ3. And to exhaust anymore time is financially risky.
They're next move better be good, or it could be their last.
Charles.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CharlesUFarley
|
|
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 21:16
|
|
Havak, sales will climb when they please their fans. And right now the negative word is spreading, and eventually it *will* affect sales. Heck, we've been telling them how to improve the game for the last 5 years, and they obviously haven't listened to us... because Civ3 is nowhere near what the fans have asked for. Seems to me that Civ3 had only one perpose, $$$. But they have to be outta their minds if they think they'll profit without fans.
Charles.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
absimiliard
|
|
NE USA
Nov 2001 time: 05:16
|
|
Hey Dan, must be rough being one of you guys. I see the same thing in the Battletech community where if one of the devs posts it tends to get overblown or misinterpreted. And over at DropShipCommand.com we're much nicer to the likes of Ratboy or Mitch Gitelman than folks 'round here seem to be to you.
Sympathy.
Hey Yin, don't sweat the details of how folks view you. (I know you don't, just offering moral support here.) People have been ragging on you since the days we first met on Firaxis's SMAC boards, pre-Apolyton days. I know I appreciated your work in compiling the bug-list, and I think the dev-team also did. Without that list, and folks like you, the SMAC patches would have much weaker.
I admit I'm more fond of the games than you. But I've never thought your analyses of SMAC and now Civ III were anything other than objective, I just disagreed with them. It's all cool.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
Then where does that leave you, Dan?
When you're silent, people become paranoid and anxious. When you communicate privately, people break your trust. When you say maybe, people take it as yes. When you're evasive (as you are now), people become confrontational.
What's left?
I'll tell you what's left: up-front honesty and concern about the feelings of your fans. You see, it doesn't matter whether you're comfortable; what matters is whether we're comfortable. It doesn't matter whether you're satisfied; what matters is whether we're satisfied. And it doesn't matter what you do about us; it matters what we do about you.
You won't convince me that you have any better course of action than to listen to our concerns, acknowledge our feedback, and keep us in the know. Whatever you do has disadvantages. The policy I'm advising has the least.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CharlesUFarley
|
|
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 21:16
|
|
Everything you've posted so far is nothing short of facts!
Charles.
Last edited by CharlesUFarley on 14-12-2001 at 20:06
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CharlesUFarley
|
|
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 21:16
|
|
I wasn't able to delete it, so I changed it... 
Last edited by CharlesUFarley on 14-12-2001 at 20:05
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CharlesUFarley
|
|
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 21:16
|
|
Hoek:
yeah I figure out the delete thing, but it gave me a error message when I tried to delete, edit worked fine though.
Thanks.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
quote: Lib: Well, he could also just not post anymore. That would be unfortunate, but it would save him the headache of trying to reply to hundreds of posts a day from disgruntled or impatient gamers. |
As far as I'm concerned, posts that evade the questions don't count anyway. The only response so far to group movement was a resounding "it's not my job". That's no response at all.
Again, the disgruntlement and impatience would wane with courteous treatment and a simple expression of genuine interest. If nothing else, they would at least gain allies from people like me; as it stands, they're losing us.
Is that a good corporate strategy?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|