 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
 |
is one way of saying it, though I prefer "mensch"
Sep 2000 time: 07:16
|
|
Though I tend not to trust our government, I have to say that I think it's probably authentic, if only because the US has almost nothing to gain by faking such a tape, and an enormous amount to lose if it were ever exposed as a fake. Of course, given the general level of "intelligence" at the CIA, maybe nobody considered that.
But this also begs a question I posted on another thread, but which seems more appropriate here: Without necessarily questioning the validity of the tapes per se, does anybody know any more about how it was found? "It was found in an abandoned house in Jalalabad" just seems beyond belief; you're conducting house-to-house searches in a place as big as Jalalabad, and you happen to grab this one videotape? I mean, did they know whose house it was? Did they just grab all videos they found, and sort them out later? ("Anything yet, Jim?" "No, but here's another Pamela/Tommy Lee for the pile.") Did it magically glisten like an object you're supposed to add to your inventory in a badly designed adventure game? Anybody have a sense of this?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Hurry
|
|
One good point I read in the newspaper: OBL wanted the tape to be found. He is anyways f***ed, so why not brag about his deeds and try to make a martyr of himself in parts of the arab world. So it was probably just left on a table in some Taleban-leader´s house.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:16
|
|
"Odd, I was thinking of a coup."
Again, don't get me wrong. Your initial thinking was rational, which lends credence to OBL's cronies' impressions. Also, we were acting in a very similar fashion to what a country would act like during a coup, I can imagine.
But for an American to think at the time that a coup was going on? For an American, the thought is totally alien. Incongruous. Our synapses aren't connected like that. Even similar ideas that would fall under a mistranslation are totally alien. Even Hollywood, the wildlife preserve we keep in order to weave stupid yarns, couldn't contemplate it--they've contemplated any number of other things, but I can't think of even a B movie that has spun a similar tale, unless maybe it involves buxom babes in a domination fetish. 
So I can guarantee that an American wouldn't have the competence to pick a phrase like that. Even in Arabic. The decision makers who finally would OK the fabrication would say: "WTF is this?"
I don't know. Maybe the Austrians fabricated it for us. Now that would be genius! 
Last edited by DanS on 15-12-2001 at 07:30
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
err a coup is when the military or some fraction effectively takes control of the goerning of the country.
This basically happens by capturing the centers of command and the media. What would the hits on WTC would had to do with a coup?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Oldest trick in the book. Manufacture a crisis. Not that I'm saying this is even a possibility here, just that it's been known to happen before. |
no,no. It's one thing to want to terrorise the populace into submission and another to enrage it so much that your ass will be grass 2 minutes after you make the coup.
If someone orcahstrated a coup, blowing up 3500 people in such a horrific manner would be equivalant to put a 200 kils of dynamite under his sit and light it up, no matter if he suceeded in diverting the authorities' attention!
Last edited by Bereta_Eder on 15-12-2001 at 12:02
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
I don't think so. The orchastrators of coups go after the men in power. Once they have that they try to keep down the people which is by then too surprised to act anyway. (they annonce a warning from the radio to people to stay at home for example)
If people who commit a coup (how are they called in english?) were to perform such acts of mass murder against the populace (as in 11 sept.) they couldn't last in power. The backlash would be too great.
In other words you don't do that kind of thing if you want to make a coup and stick to power. Not to say that it is absolutely unnecessairy to do it too.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
No, I think you are now stretching too far KH.
We were talking about how to take over a country in a coup. Not how to make a democracy implode which means not how to reduce drastically civil rights.
A coup is one thing. Working -even manipualting - but always remaining in democreacy is another.
The standard procedure for a COUP (not for you to pass on your ideas in a functioning democracy) has nothing to do with mass murder and everything to do with seizing centers of power.
What possible good would for example have the people of the coup by smashing planes into the WTC???
No political leader was hurt. The people who died didn;t hold an importnat position of power.
It doesn't need to happen.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
a coup is seizing power through undemocratic means (no elections). that's it
manipualting a nation into martial law is something completely different.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|