|
Altauria
|
|
Chicago/Boston
Dec 2001
time: 00:16
|
|
If someone has already brought this up, I'm sorry. I was just wondering if anyone else was disappointed by the omissions of some of the civs.....from civ.2. I was thinking there was going to be additions and I was shocked when I read the list. I mean, the most shocking of which was the deletion of the Spanish! I mean, we all know they didn't have any historical importance in world history, right?...PPFFFF. I especially don't understand that omission. I think and addition of the Ottomans would have been important. I'll just leave it at that because I don't feel like giving a history lesson. I guess I understand more of the omissions of the celts, vikings, and mongols.....only for reasons that they were more of a scattered tribe nations than "empires" as we know it. But the Spanish??? C'mon! After all, at one time they were the most powerful nation in the world. They could've replaced the Iroquois, or even the Zulu. As far as the Zulus are concerned, I don't see how they were at all influential in the global realm, other than the game developers trying to be politically correct. In that case, they should have left in the Mongols. Or added the Incas (being they were far more advanced than even the Aztecs were) and the ancient cultures from Burma and Indonesia.
|
15-12-2001 04:37
|